## Why
#29856 already owns the durable thread intent and exact environment
binding. This PR adds only the small missing extension boundary: an
extension can contribute one named World State section, while core still
owns persistence, diffing, and model-visible fragment types.
This lets skills stay in the skills extension instead of moving their
runtime into core.
## Shape
```text
extension-owned state
|
| contribute section id + JSON snapshot + renderer
v
core World State
|
| compare with the previous snapshot
v
no message, or one incremental model-visible update
```
The extension API is deliberately small:
```rust
fn contribute_world_state(...) -> Vec<WorldStateSectionContribution>
```
Core adapts the rendered result to `ContextualUserFragment`, records the
snapshot, and keeps the existing compaction/resume behavior.
## What changes
- Adds extension-owned World State section contributions.
- Calls those contributors from the existing per-step World State
builder.
- Restores durable selected capability roots into extension thread state
on resume.
- Keeps the actual model-context fragment and rollout machinery in core.
## What does not change
- No skill or MCP implementation moves out of its extension.
- No new file watcher, generation, or RPC.
- No generic migration of existing World State sections.
- No change to the stable environment-ID assumption from #29856.
## Example
```text
step 1 snapshot: skills = []
step 2 snapshot: skills = [executor-demo:deploy]
core asks the skills extension to render only that change.
```
## Stack
1. **This PR:** let extensions contribute World State sections.
2. Project executor skills through the skills extension.
3. Pin one MCP runtime to each model step.
4. Project selected MCP/app/connector metadata by environment
availability.
5. One end-to-end integration scenario.
jif
c9e6d9783d