We use to put the review prompt in the first user message as well to
bypass statsig overrides, but now that's been resolved and instructions
are being respected, so we're duplicating the review instructions.
Before when you would enter `/di`, hit tab on `/diff`, and then hit
enter, it would execute `/diff`. But now it's just sending it as a text.
This fixes the issue.
Here's the logic:
1. If text is empty and selector is open:
- Enter on a prompt without args should autosubmit the prompt
- Enter on a prompt with numeric args should add `/prompts:name ` to the
text input
- Enter on a prompt with named args should add `/prompts:name ARG1=""
ARG2=""` to the text input
2. If text is not empty but no args are passed:
- For prompts with numeric args -> we allow it to submit (params are
optional)
- For prompts with named args -> we throw an error (all params should
have values)
<img width="454" height="246" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-23 at 2 23 21 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd180a1b-7d17-42ec-b231-8da48828b811"
/>
Adds a "View Stack" to the bottom pane to allow for pushing/popping
bottom panels.
`esc` will go back instead of dismissing.
Benefit: We retain the "selection state" of a parent panel (e.g. the
review panel).
Adds the following options:
1. Review current changes
2. Review a specific commit
3. Review against a base branch (PR style)
4. Custom instructions
<img width="487" height="330" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-20 at 2 11 36 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/edb0aaa5-5747-47fa-881f-cc4c4f7fe8bc"
/>
---
\+ Adds the following UI helpers:
1. Makes list selection searchable
2. Adds navigation to the bottom pane, so you could add a stack of
popups
3. Basic custom prompt view
Proposal: We want to record a dev message like so:
```
{
"type": "message",
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "input_text",
"text": "<user_action>
<context>User initiated a review task. Here's the full review output from reviewer model. User may select one or more comments to resolve.</context>
<action>review</action>
<results>
{findings_str}
</results>
</user_action>"
}
]
},
```
Without showing in the chat transcript.
Rough idea, but it fixes issue where the user finishes a review thread,
and asks the parent "fix the rest of the review issues" thinking that
the parent knows about it.
### Question: Why not a tool call?
Because the agent didn't make the call, it was a human. + we haven't
implemented sub-agents yet, and we'll need to think about the way we
represent these human-led tool calls for the agent.
1. Adds the environment prompt (including cwd) to review thread
2. Prepends the review prompt as a user message (temporary fix so the
instructions are not replaced on backend)
3. Sets reasoning to low
4. Sets default review model to `gpt-5-codex`
There are exactly 4 types of flaky tests in Windows x86 right now:
1. `review_input_isolated_from_parent_history` => Times out waiting for
closing events
2. `review_does_not_emit_agent_message_on_structured_output` => Times
out waiting for closing events
3. `auto_compact_runs_after_token_limit_hit` => Times out waiting for
closing events
4. `auto_compact_runs_after_token_limit_hit` => Also has a problem where
auto compact should add a third request, but receives 4 requests.
1, 2, and 3 seem to be solved with increasing threads on windows runner
from 2 -> 4.
Don't know yet why # 4 is happening, but probably also because of
WireMock issues on windows causing races.
## 📝 Review Mode -- Core
This PR introduces the Core implementation for Review mode:
- New op `Op::Review { prompt: String }:` spawns a child review task
with isolated context, a review‑specific system prompt, and a
`Config.review_model`.
- `EnteredReviewMode`: emitted when the child review session starts.
Every event from this point onwards reflects the review session.
- `ExitedReviewMode(Option<ReviewOutputEvent>)`: emitted when the review
finishes or is interrupted, with optional structured findings:
```json
{
"findings": [
{
"title": "<≤ 80 chars, imperative>",
"body": "<valid Markdown explaining *why* this is a problem; cite files/lines/functions>",
"confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>,
"priority": <int 0-3>,
"code_location": {
"absolute_file_path": "<file path>",
"line_range": {"start": <int>, "end": <int>}
}
}
],
"overall_correctness": "patch is correct" | "patch is incorrect",
"overall_explanation": "<1-3 sentence explanation justifying the overall_correctness verdict>",
"overall_confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>
}
```
## Questions
### Why separate out its own message history?
We want the review thread to match the training of our review models as
much as possible -- that means using a custom prompt, removing user
instructions, and starting a clean chat history.
We also want to make sure the review thread doesn't leak into the parent
thread.
### Why do this as a mode, vs. sub-agents?
1. We want review to be a synchronous task, so it's fine for now to do a
bespoke implementation.
2. We're still unclear about the final structure for sub-agents. We'd
prefer to land this quickly and then refactor into sub-agents without
rushing that implementation.
Adds custom `/prompts` to `~/.codex/prompts/<command>.md`.
<img width="239" height="107" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-25 at 6 22 42 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe6ebbaa-1bf6-49d3-95f9-fdc53b752679"
/>
---
Details:
1. Adds `Op::ListCustomPrompts` to core.
2. Returns `ListCustomPromptsResponse` with list of `CustomPrompt`
(name, content).
3. TUI calls the operation on load, and populates the custom prompts
(excluding prompts that collide with builtins).
4. Selecting the custom prompt automatically sends the prompt to the
agent.
In this PR:
- [x] Add support for dragging / copying image files into chat.
- [x] Don't remove image placeholders when submitting.
- [x] Add tests.
Works for:
- Image Files
- Dragging MacOS Screenshots (Terminal, iTerm)
Todos:
- [ ] In some terminals (VSCode, WIndows Powershell, and remote
SSH-ing), copy-pasting a file streams the escaped filepath as individual
key events rather than a single Paste event. We'll need to have a
function (in a separate PR) for detecting these paste events.
dedrisian-oaiandGitHub