Commit Graph
96 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael BolinandGitHub 61dfe0b86c chore: clean up argument-comment lint and roll out all-target CI on macOS (#16054)
## Why

`argument-comment-lint` was green in CI even though the repo still had
many uncommented literal arguments. The main gap was target coverage:
the repo wrapper did not force Cargo to inspect test-only call sites, so
examples like the `latest_session_lookup_params(true, ...)` tests in
`codex-rs/tui_app_server/src/lib.rs` never entered the blocking CI path.

This change cleans up the existing backlog, makes the default repo lint
path cover all Cargo targets, and starts rolling that stricter CI
enforcement out on the platform where it is currently validated.

## What changed

- mechanically fixed existing `argument-comment-lint` violations across
the `codex-rs` workspace, including tests, examples, and benches
- updated `tools/argument-comment-lint/run-prebuilt-linter.sh` and
`tools/argument-comment-lint/run.sh` so non-`--fix` runs default to
`--all-targets` unless the caller explicitly narrows the target set
- fixed both wrappers so forwarded cargo arguments after `--` are
preserved with a single separator
- documented the new default behavior in
`tools/argument-comment-lint/README.md`
- updated `rust-ci` so the macOS lint lane keeps the plain wrapper
invocation and therefore enforces `--all-targets`, while Linux and
Windows temporarily pass `-- --lib --bins`

That temporary CI split keeps the stricter all-targets check where it is
already cleaned up, while leaving room to finish the remaining Linux-
and Windows-specific target-gated cleanup before enabling
`--all-targets` on those runners. The Linux and Windows failures on the
intermediate revision were caused by the wrapper forwarding bug, not by
additional lint findings in those lanes.

## Validation

- `bash -n tools/argument-comment-lint/run.sh`
- `bash -n tools/argument-comment-lint/run-prebuilt-linter.sh`
- shell-level wrapper forwarding check for `-- --lib --bins`
- shell-level wrapper forwarding check for `-- --tests`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
- `cargo test` in `tools/argument-comment-lint`
- `cargo test -p codex-terminal-detection`

## Follow-up

- Clean up remaining Linux-only target-gated callsites, then switch the
Linux lint lane back to the plain wrapper invocation.
- Clean up remaining Windows-only target-gated callsites, then switch
the Windows lint lane back to the plain wrapper invocation.
2026-03-27 19:00:44 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub e6e2999209 permissions: remove macOS seatbelt extension profiles (#15918)
## Why

`PermissionProfile` should only describe the per-command permissions we
still want to grant dynamically. Keeping
`MacOsSeatbeltProfileExtensions` in that surface forced extra macOS-only
approval, protocol, schema, and TUI branches for a capability we no
longer want to expose.

## What changed

- Removed the macOS-specific permission-profile types from
`codex-protocol`, the app-server v2 API, and the generated
schema/TypeScript artifacts.
- Deleted the core and sandboxing plumbing that threaded
`MacOsSeatbeltProfileExtensions` through execution requests and seatbelt
construction.
- Simplified macOS seatbelt generation so it always includes the fixed
read-only preferences allowlist instead of carrying a configurable
profile extension.
- Removed the macOS additional-permissions UI/docs/test coverage and
deleted the obsolete macOS permission modules.
- Tightened `request_permissions` intersection handling so explicitly
empty requested read lists are preserved only when that field was
actually granted, avoiding zero-grant responses being stored as active
permissions.
2026-03-26 17:12:45 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 5906c6a658 chore: remove skill metadata from command approval payloads (#15906)
## Why

This is effectively a follow-up to
[#15812](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/15812). That change
removed the special skill-script exec path, but `skill_metadata` was
still being threaded through command-approval payloads even though the
approval flow no longer uses it to render prompts or resolve decisions.

Keeping it around added extra protocol, schema, and client surface area
without changing behavior.

Removing it keeps the command-approval contract smaller and avoids
carrying a dead field through app-server, TUI, and MCP boundaries.

## What changed

- removed `ExecApprovalRequestSkillMetadata` and the corresponding
`skillMetadata` field from core approval events and the v2 app-server
protocol
- removed the generated JSON and TypeScript schema output for that field
- updated app-server, MCP server, TUI, and TUI app-server approval
plumbing to stop forwarding the field
- cleaned up tests that previously constructed or asserted
`skillMetadata`

## Testing

- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol`
- `cargo test -p codex-protocol`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-test-client`
- `cargo test -p codex-mcp-server`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
2026-03-26 15:32:03 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub dfb36573cd sandboxing: use OsString for SandboxCommand.program (#15897)
## Why

`SandboxCommand.program` represents an executable path, but keeping it
as `String` forced path-backed callers to run `to_string_lossy()` before
the sandbox layer ever touched the command. That loses fidelity earlier
than necessary and adds avoidable conversions in runtimes that already
have a `PathBuf`.

## What changed

- Changed `SandboxCommand.program` to `OsString`.
- Updated `SandboxManager::transform` to keep the program and argv in
`OsString` form until the `SandboxExecRequest` conversion boundary.
- Switched the path-backed `apply_patch` and `js_repl` runtimes to pass
`into_os_string()` instead of `to_string_lossy()`.
- Updated the remaining string-backed builders and tests to match the
new type while preserving the existing Linux helper `arg0` behavior.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-sandboxing`
- `just argument-comment-lint -p codex-core -p codex-sandboxing`
- `cargo test -p codex-core` currently fails in unrelated existing
config tests: `config::tests::approvals_reviewer_*` and
`config::tests::smart_approvals_alias_*`
2026-03-26 20:38:33 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 01fa4f0212 core: remove special execve handling for skill scripts (#15812) 2026-03-26 07:46:04 -07:00
jif-oaiandGitHub 7dac332c93 feat: exec-server prep for unified exec (#15691)
This PR partially rebase `unified_exec` on the `exec-server` and adapt
the `exec-server` accordingly.

## What changed in `exec-server`

1. Replaced the old "broadcast-driven; process-global" event model with
process-scoped session events. The goal is to be able to have dedicated
handler for each process.
2. Add to protocol contract to support explicit lifecycle status and
stream ordering:
- `WriteResponse` now returns `WriteStatus` (Accepted, UnknownProcess,
StdinClosed, Starting) instead of a bool.
  - Added seq fields to output/exited notifications.
  - Added terminal process/closed notification.
3. Demultiplexed remote notifications into per-process channels. Same as
for the event sys
4. Local and remote backends now both implement ExecBackend.
5. Local backend wraps internal process ID/operations into per-process
ExecProcess objects.
6. Remote backend registers a session channel before launch and
unregisters on failed launch.

## What changed in `unified_exec`

1. Added unified process-state model and backend-neutral process
wrapper. This will probably disappear in the future, but it makes it
easier to keep the work flowing on both side.
- `UnifiedExecProcess` now handles both local PTY sessions and remote
exec-server processes through a shared `ProcessHandle`.
- Added `ProcessState` to track has_exited, exit_code, and terminal
failure message consistently across backends.
2. Routed write and lifecycle handling through process-level methods.

## Some rationals

1. The change centralizes execution transport in exec-server while
preserving policy and orchestration ownership in core, avoiding
duplicated launch approval logic. This comes from internal discussion.
2. Session-scoped events remove coupling/cross-talk between processes
and make stream ordering and terminal state explicit (seq, closed,
failed).
3. The failure-path surfacing (remote launch failures, write failures,
transport disconnects) makes command tool output and cleanup behavior
deterministic

## Follow-ups:
* Unify the concept of thread ID behind an obfuscated struct
* FD handling
* Full zsh-fork compatibility
* Full network sandboxing compatibility
* Handle ws disconnection
2026-03-26 15:22:34 +01:00
937cb5081d fix: fix old system bubblewrap compatibility without falling back to vendored bwrap (#15693)
Fixes #15283.

## Summary
Older system bubblewrap builds reject `--argv0`, which makes our Linux
sandbox fail before the helper can re-exec. This PR keeps using system
`/usr/bin/bwrap` whenever it exists and only falls back to vendored
bwrap when the system binary is missing. That matters on stricter
AppArmor hosts, where the distro bwrap package also provides the policy
setup needed for user namespaces.

For old system bwrap, we avoid `--argv0` instead of switching binaries:
- pass the sandbox helper a full-path `argv0`,
- keep the existing `current_exe() + --argv0` path when the selected
launcher supports it,
- otherwise omit `--argv0` and re-exec through the helper's own
`argv[0]` path, whose basename still dispatches as
`codex-linux-sandbox`.

Also updates the launcher/warning tests and docs so they match the new
behavior: present-but-old system bwrap uses the compatibility path, and
only absent system bwrap falls back to vendored.

### Validation

1. Install Ubuntu 20.04 in a VM
2. Compile codex and run without bubblewrap installed - see a warning
about falling back to the vendored bwrap
3. Install bwrap and verify version is 0.4.0 without `argv0` support
4. run codex and use apply_patch tool without errors

<img width="802" height="631" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-25 at 11 48 36 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77248a29-aa38-4d7c-9833-496ec6a458b8"
/>
<img width="807" height="634" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-25 at 11 47 32 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5af8b850-a466-489b-95a6-455b76b5050f"
/>
<img width="812" height="635" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-25 at 11 45 45 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/438074f0-8435-4274-a667-332efdd5cb57"
/>
<img width="801" height="623" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-25 at 11 43 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0dc8d3f5-e8cf-4218-b4b4-a4f7d9bf02e3"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
2026-03-25 23:51:39 -07:00
9dbe098349 Extract codex-core-skills crate (#15749)
## Summary
- move skill loading and management into codex-core-skills
- leave codex-core with the thin integration layer and shared wiring

## Testing
- CI

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-25 12:57:42 -07:00
pakrym-oaiandGitHub 504aeb0e09 Use AbsolutePathBuf for cwd state (#15710)
Migrate `cwd` and related session/config state to `AbsolutePathBuf` so
downstream consumers consistently see absolute working directories.

Add test-only `.abs()` helpers for `Path`, `PathBuf`, and `TempDir`, and
update branch-local tests to use them instead of
`AbsolutePathBuf::try_from(...)`.

For the remaining TUI/app-server snapshot coverage that renders absolute
cwd values, keep the snapshots unchanged and skip the Windows-only cases
where the platform-specific absolute path layout differs.
2026-03-25 16:02:22 +00:00
viyatb-oaiandGitHub 95ba762620 fix: support split carveouts in windows restricted-token sandbox (#14172)
## Summary
- keep legacy Windows restricted-token sandboxing as the supported
baseline
- support the split-policy subset that restricted-token can enforce
directly today
- support full-disk read, the same writable root set as legacy
`WorkspaceWrite`, and extra read-only carveouts under those writable
roots via additional deny-write ACLs
- continue to fail closed for unsupported split-only shapes, including
explicit unreadable (`none`) carveouts, reopened writable descendants
under read-only carveouts, and writable root sets that do not match the
legacy workspace roots

## Example
Given a filesystem policy like:

```toml
":root" = "read"
":cwd" = "write"
"./docs" = "read"
```

the restricted-token backend can keep the workspace writable while
denying writes under `docs` by layering an extra deny-write carveout on
top of the legacy workspace-write roots.

A policy like:

```toml
"/workspace" = "write"
"/workspace/docs" = "read"
"/workspace/docs/tmp" = "write"
```

still fails closed, because the unelevated backend cannot reopen the
nested writable descendant safely.

## Stack
-> fix: support split carveouts in windows restricted-token sandbox
#14172
fix: support split carveouts in windows elevated sandbox #14568
2026-03-24 22:54:18 -07:00
pakrym-oaiandGitHub 0b619afc87 Drop sandbox_permissions from sandbox exec requests (#15665)
## Summary
- drop `sandbox_permissions` from the sandboxing `ExecOptions` and
`ExecRequest` adapter types
- remove the now-unused plumbing from shell, unified exec, JS REPL, and
apply-patch runtime call sites
- default reconstructed `ExecParams` to `SandboxPermissions::UseDefault`
where the lower-level API still requires the field

## Testing
- `just fmt`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
- `cargo test -p codex-core` (still running locally; first failures
observed in `suite::cli_stream::responses_mode_stream_cli`,
`suite::cli_stream::responses_mode_stream_cli_supports_openai_base_url_config_override`,
and
`suite::cli_stream::responses_mode_stream_cli_supports_openai_base_url_env_fallback`)
2026-03-24 15:42:45 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub e89e5136bd fix: keep zsh-fork release assets after removing shell-tool-mcp (#15644)
## Why

`shell-tool-mcp` and the Bash fork are no longer needed, but the patched
zsh fork is still relevant for shell escalation and for the
DotSlash-backed zsh-fork integration tests.

Deleting the old `shell-tool-mcp` workflow also deleted the only
pipeline that rebuilt those patched zsh binaries. This keeps the package
removal, while preserving a small release path that can be reused
whenever `codex-rs/shell-escalation/patches/zsh-exec-wrapper.patch`
changes.

## What changed

- removed the `shell-tool-mcp` workspace package, its npm
packaging/release jobs, the Bash test fixture, and the remaining
Bash-specific compatibility wiring
- deleted the old `.github/workflows/shell-tool-mcp.yml` and
`.github/workflows/shell-tool-mcp-ci.yml` workflows now that their
responsibilities have been replaced or removed
- kept the zsh patch under
`codex-rs/shell-escalation/patches/zsh-exec-wrapper.patch` and updated
the `codex-rs/shell-escalation` docs/code to describe the zsh-based flow
directly
- added `.github/workflows/rust-release-zsh.yml` to build only the three
zsh binaries that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/zsh` needs today:
  - `aarch64-apple-darwin` on `macos-15`
  - `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl` on `ubuntu-24.04`
  - `aarch64-unknown-linux-musl` on `ubuntu-24.04`
- extracted the shared zsh build/smoke-test/stage logic into
`.github/scripts/build-zsh-release-artifact.sh`, made that helper
directly executable, and now invoke it directly from the workflow so the
Linux and macOS jobs only keep the OS-specific setup in YAML
- wired those standalone `codex-zsh-*.tar.gz` assets into
`rust-release.yml` and added `.github/dotslash-zsh-config.json` so
releases also publish a `codex-zsh` DotSlash file
- updated the checked-in `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/zsh` fixture
comments to explain that new releases come from the standalone zsh
assets, while the checked-in fixture remains pinned to the latest
historical release until a newer zsh artifact is published
- tightened a couple of follow-on cleanups in
`codex-rs/shell-escalation`: the `ExecParams::command` comment now
describes the shell `-c`/`-lc` string more clearly, and the README now
points at the same `git.code.sf.net` zsh source URL that the workflow
uses

## Testing

- `cargo test -p codex-shell-escalation`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
- `bash -n .github/scripts/build-zsh-release-artifact.sh`
- attempted `cargo test -p codex-core`; unrelated existing failures
remain, but the touched `tools::runtimes::shell::unix_escalation::*`
coverage passed during that run
2026-03-24 12:56:26 -07:00
pakrym-oaiandGitHub f49eb8e9d7 Extract sandbox manager and transforms into codex-sandboxing (#15603)
Extract sandbox manager
2026-03-24 08:20:57 -07:00
pakrym-oaiandGitHub 431af0807c Move macOS sandbox builders into codex-sandboxing (#15593)
## Summary
- move macOS permission merging/intersection logic and tests from
`codex-core` into `codex-sandboxing`
- move seatbelt policy builders, permissions logic, SBPL assets, and
their tests into `codex-sandboxing`
- keep `codex-core` owning only the seatbelt spawn wrapper and switch
call sites to import the moved APIs directly

## Notes
- no re-exports added
- moved the seatbelt tests with the implementation so internal helpers
could stay private
- local verification is still finishing while this PR is open
2026-03-23 21:26:35 -07:00
Dylan HurdandGitHub ea8b07e680 chore(core) Remove Feature::PowershellUtf8 (#15128)
## Summary
This feature has been enabled for powershell for a while now, let's get
rid of the logic

## Testing
- [x] Unit tests
2026-03-20 22:03:31 +00:00
2e22885e79 Split features into codex-features crate (#15253)
- Split the feature system into a new `codex-features` crate.
- Cut `codex-core` and workspace consumers over to the new config and
warning APIs.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Ibrahim <219906144+aibrahim-oai@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-19 20:12:07 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub a3e59e9e85 core: add a full-buffer exec capture policy (#15254) 2026-03-20 02:38:12 +00:00
xl-openaiandGitHub dcd5e08269 fix: harden plugin feature gating (#15104)
Resubmit https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/15020 with correct
content.

1. Use requirement-resolved config.features as the plugin gate.
2. Guard plugin/list, plugin/read, and related flows behind that gate.
3. Skip bad marketplace.json files instead of failing the whole list.
4. Simplify plugin state and caching.
2026-03-19 00:03:37 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub b77fe8fefe Apply argument comment lint across codex-rs (#14652)
## Why

Once the repo-local lint exists, `codex-rs` needs to follow the
checked-in convention and CI needs to keep it from drifting. This commit
applies the fallback `/*param*/` style consistently across existing
positional literal call sites without changing those APIs.

The longer-term preference is still to avoid APIs that require comments
by choosing clearer parameter types and call shapes. This PR is
intentionally the mechanical follow-through for the places where the
existing signatures stay in place.

After rebasing onto newer `main`, the rollout also had to cover newly
introduced `tui_app_server` call sites. That made it clear the first cut
of the CI job was too expensive for the common path: it was spending
almost as much time installing `cargo-dylint` and re-testing the lint
crate as a representative test job spends running product tests. The CI
update keeps the full workspace enforcement but trims that extra
overhead from ordinary `codex-rs` PRs.

## What changed

- keep a dedicated `argument_comment_lint` job in `rust-ci`
- mechanically annotate remaining opaque positional literals across
`codex-rs` with exact `/*param*/` comments, including the rebased
`tui_app_server` call sites that now fall under the lint
- keep the checked-in style aligned with the lint policy by using
`/*param*/` and leaving string and char literals uncommented
- cache `cargo-dylint`, `dylint-link`, and the relevant Cargo
registry/git metadata in the lint job
- split changed-path detection so the lint crate's own `cargo test` step
runs only when `tools/argument-comment-lint/*` or `rust-ci.yml` changes
- continue to run the repo wrapper over the `codex-rs` workspace, so
product-code enforcement is unchanged

Most of the code changes in this commit are intentionally mechanical
comment rewrites or insertions driven by the lint itself.

## Verification

- `./tools/argument-comment-lint/run.sh --workspace`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server -p codex-tui`
- parsed `.github/workflows/rust-ci.yml` locally with PyYAML

---

* -> #14652
* #14651
2026-03-16 16:48:15 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub b859a98e0f refactor: make unified-exec zsh-fork state explicit (#14633)
## Why

The unified-exec path was carrying zsh-fork state in a partially
flattened way.

First, the decision about whether zsh-fork was active came from feature
selection in `ToolsConfig`, while the real prerequisites lived in
session state. That left the handler and runtime defending against
partially configured cases later.

Second, once zsh-fork was active, its two runtime-only paths were
threaded through the runtime as separate arguments even though they form
one coherent piece of configuration.

This change keeps unified-exec on a single session-derived source of
truth and bundles the zsh-fork-specific paths into a named config type
so the runtime can pass them around as one unit.

In particular, this PR introduces this enum so the `ZshFork` variant can
carry the appropriate state with it:

```rust
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub enum UnifiedExecShellMode {
    Direct,
    ZshFork(ZshForkConfig),
}

#[derive(Debug, Clone, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct ZshForkConfig {
    pub(crate) shell_zsh_path: AbsolutePathBuf,
    pub(crate) main_execve_wrapper_exe: AbsolutePathBuf,
}
```

This cleanup was done in preparation for
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/13432.

## What Changed

- Replaced the feature-only `UnifiedExecBackendConfig` split with
`UnifiedExecShellMode` in `codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec.rs`.
- Derived the unified-exec mode from session-backed inputs when building
turn `ToolsConfig`, and preserved that mode across model switches and
review turns.
- Introduced `ZshForkConfig`, which stores the resolved zsh-fork
`AbsolutePathBuf` values for the configured `zsh` binary and `execve`
wrapper.
- Threaded `ZshForkConfig` through unified-exec command construction and
the zsh-fork preparation path so zsh-fork-specific runtime code consumes
a single config object instead of separate path arguments.
- Added focused tests for constructing zsh-fork mode only when session
prerequisites are available, and updated the zsh-fork expectations to be
target-platform aware.

## Testing

- `cargo test -p codex-core zsh_fork --lib`


---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/14633).
* #13432
* __->__ #14633
2026-03-13 17:20:01 -07:00
bc24017d64 Add Smart Approvals guardian review across core, app-server, and TUI (#13860)
## Summary
- add `approvals_reviewer = "user" | "guardian_subagent"` as the runtime
control for who reviews approval requests
- route Smart Approvals guardian review through core for command
execution, file changes, managed-network approvals, MCP approvals, and
delegated/subagent approval flows
- expose guardian review in app-server with temporary unstable
`item/autoApprovalReview/{started,completed}` notifications carrying
`targetItemId`, `review`, and `action`
- update the TUI so Smart Approvals can be enabled from `/experimental`,
aligned with the matching `/approvals` mode, and surfaced clearly while
reviews are pending or resolved

## Runtime model
This PR does not introduce a new `approval_policy`.

Instead:
- `approval_policy` still controls when approval is needed
- `approvals_reviewer` controls who reviewable approval requests are
routed to:
  - `user`
  - `guardian_subagent`

`guardian_subagent` is a carefully prompted reviewer subagent that
gathers relevant context and applies a risk-based decision framework
before approving or denying the request.

The `smart_approvals` feature flag is a rollout/UI gate. Core runtime
behavior keys off `approvals_reviewer`.

When Smart Approvals is enabled from the TUI, it also switches the
current `/approvals` settings to the matching Smart Approvals mode so
users immediately see guardian review in the active thread:
- `approval_policy = on-request`
- `approvals_reviewer = guardian_subagent`
- `sandbox_mode = workspace-write`

Users can still change `/approvals` afterward.

Config-load behavior stays intentionally narrow:
- plain `smart_approvals = true` in `config.toml` remains just the
rollout/UI gate and does not auto-set `approvals_reviewer`
- the deprecated `guardian_approval = true` alias migration does
backfill `approvals_reviewer = "guardian_subagent"` in the same scope
when that reviewer is not already configured there, so old configs
preserve their original guardian-enabled behavior

ARC remains a separate safety check. For MCP tool approvals, ARC
escalations now flow into the configured reviewer instead of always
bypassing guardian and forcing manual review.

## Config stability
The runtime reviewer override is stable, but the config-backed
app-server protocol shape is still settling.

- `thread/start`, `thread/resume`, and `turn/start` keep stable
`approvalsReviewer` overrides
- the config-backed `approvals_reviewer` exposure returned via
`config/read` (including profile-level config) is now marked
`[UNSTABLE]` / experimental in the app-server protocol until we are more
confident in that config surface

## App-server surface
This PR intentionally keeps the guardian app-server shape narrow and
temporary.

It adds generic unstable lifecycle notifications:
- `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/completed`

with payloads of the form:
- `{ threadId, turnId, targetItemId, review, action? }`

`review` is currently:
- `{ status, riskScore?, riskLevel?, rationale? }`
- where `status` is one of `inProgress`, `approved`, `denied`, or
`aborted`

`action` carries the guardian action summary payload from core when
available. This lets clients render temporary standalone pending-review
UI, including parallel reviews, even when the underlying tool item has
not been emitted yet.

These notifications are explicitly documented as `[UNSTABLE]` and
expected to change soon.

This PR does **not** persist guardian review state onto `thread/read`
tool items. The intended follow-up is to attach guardian review state to
the reviewed tool item lifecycle instead, which would improve
consistency with manual approvals and allow thread history / reconnect
flows to replay guardian review state directly.

## TUI behavior
- `/experimental` exposes the rollout gate as `Smart Approvals`
- enabling it in the TUI enables the feature and switches the current
session to the matching Smart Approvals `/approvals` mode
- disabling it in the TUI clears the persisted `approvals_reviewer`
override when appropriate and returns the session to default manual
review when the effective reviewer changes
- `/approvals` still exposes the reviewer choice directly
- the TUI renders:
- pending guardian review state in the live status footer, including
parallel review aggregation
  - resolved approval/denial state in history

## Scope notes
This PR includes the supporting core/runtime work needed to make Smart
Approvals usable end-to-end:
- shell / unified-exec / apply_patch / managed-network / MCP guardian
review
- delegated/subagent approval routing into guardian review
- guardian review risk metadata and action summaries for app-server/TUI
- config/profile/TUI handling for `smart_approvals`, `guardian_approval`
alias migration, and `approvals_reviewer`
- a small internal cleanup of delegated approval forwarding to dedupe
fallback paths and simplify guardian-vs-parent approval waiting (no
intended behavior change)

Out of scope for this PR:
- redesigning the existing manual approval protocol shapes
- persisting guardian review state onto app-server `ThreadItem`s
- delegated MCP elicitation auto-review (the current delegated MCP
guardian shim only covers the legacy `RequestUserInput` path)

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-13 15:27:00 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub ef37d313c6 fix: preserve zsh-fork escalation fds across unified-exec spawn paths (#13644)
## Why

`zsh-fork` sessions launched through unified-exec need the escalation
socket to survive the wrapper -> server -> child handoff so later
intercepted `exec()` calls can still reach the escalation server.

The inherited-fd spawn path also needs to avoid closing Rust's internal
exec-error pipe, and the shell-escalation handoff needs to tolerate the
receive-side case where a transferred fd is installed into the same
stdio slot it will be mapped onto.

## What Changed

- Added `SpawnLifecycle::inherited_fds()` in
`codex-rs/core/src/unified_exec/process.rs` and threaded inherited fds
through `codex-rs/core/src/unified_exec/process_manager.rs` so
unified-exec can preserve required descriptors across both PTY and
no-stdin pipe spawn paths.
- Updated `codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/zsh_fork_backend.rs`
to expose the escalation socket fd through the spawn lifecycle.
- Added inherited-fd-aware spawn helpers in
`codex-rs/utils/pty/src/pty.rs` and `codex-rs/utils/pty/src/pipe.rs`,
including Unix pre-exec fd pruning that preserves requested inherited
fds while leaving `FD_CLOEXEC` descriptors alone. The pruning helper is
now named `close_inherited_fds_except()` to better describe that
behavior.
- Updated `codex-rs/shell-escalation/src/unix/escalate_client.rs` to
duplicate local stdio before transfer and send destination stdio numbers
in `SuperExecMessage`, so the wrapper keeps using its own
`stdin`/`stdout`/`stderr` until the escalated child takes over.
- Updated `codex-rs/shell-escalation/src/unix/escalate_server.rs` so the
server accepts the overlap case where a received fd reuses the same
stdio descriptor number that the child setup will target with `dup2`.
- Added comments around the PTY stdio wiring and the overlap regression
helper to make the fd handoff and controlling-terminal setup easier to
follow.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-utils-pty`
- covers preserved-fd PTY spawn behavior, PTY resize, Python REPL
continuity, exec-failure reporting, and the no-stdin pipe path
- `cargo test -p codex-shell-escalation`
- covers duplicated-fd transfer on the client side and verifies the
overlap case by passing a pipe-backed stdin payload through the
server-side `dup2` path

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/13644).
* #14624
* __->__ #13644
2026-03-13 20:25:31 +00:00
iceweasel-oaiandGitHub 6b3d82daca Use a private desktop for Windows sandbox instead of Winsta0\Default (#14400)
## Summary
- launch Windows sandboxed children on a private desktop instead of
`Winsta0\Default`
- make private desktop the default while keeping
`windows.sandbox_private_desktop=false` as the escape hatch
- centralize process launch through the shared
`create_process_as_user(...)` path
- scope the private desktop ACL to the launching logon SID

## Why
Today sandboxed Windows commands run on the visible shared desktop. That
leaves an avoidable same-desktop attack surface for window interaction,
spoofing, and related UI/input issues. This change moves sandboxed
commands onto a dedicated per-launch desktop by default so the sandbox
no longer shares `Winsta0\Default` with the user session.

The implementation stays conservative on security with no silent
fallback back to `Winsta0\Default`

If private-desktop setup fails on a machine, users can still opt out
explicitly with `windows.sandbox_private_desktop=false`.

## Validation
- `cargo build -p codex-cli`
- elevated-path `codex exec` desktop-name probe returned
`CodexSandboxDesktop-*`
- elevated-path `codex exec` smoke sweep for shell commands, nested
`pwsh`, jobs, and hidden `notepad` launch
- unelevated-path full private-desktop compatibility sweep via `codex
exec` with `-c windows.sandbox=unelevated`
2026-03-13 10:13:39 -07:00
Celia ChenandGitHub 0c60eea4a5 feat: support skill-scoped managed network domain overrides in skill config (#14522)
## Summary

This lets skill loading split `permissions.network` into two distinct
pieces:

- `permissions.network.enabled` still feeds the skill
`PermissionProfile` and remains the coarse gate for whether the skill
can use network access at all.
- `permissions.network.allowed_domains` and
`permissions.network.denied_domains` are lifted into a new
`SkillManagedNetworkOverride` so managed-network sessions can start
per-skill scoped proxies with the right domain overrides.

The change also updates `SkillMetadata` construction sites and adds
loader tests covering YAML parsing plus normalization of the network
gate vs. domain override fields.

## Follow-up
A PR that uses the network_override to spin up a skill-specific proxy if
network_override is not none.
2026-03-13 04:45:14 +00:00
Jack MousseauandGitHub b7dba72dbd Rename reject approval policy to granular (#14516) 2026-03-12 16:38:04 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 0c8a36676a fix: move inline codex-rs/core unit tests into sibling files (#14444)
## Why
PR #13783 moved the `codex.rs` unit tests into `codex_tests.rs`. This
applies the same extraction pattern across the rest of `codex-rs/core`
so the production modules stay focused on runtime code instead of large
inline test blocks.

Keeping the tests in sibling files also makes follow-up edits easier to
review because product changes no longer have to share a file with
hundreds or thousands of lines of test scaffolding.

## What changed
- replaced each inline `mod tests { ... }` in `codex-rs/core/src/**`
with a path-based module declaration
- moved each extracted unit test module into a sibling `*_tests.rs`
file, using `mod_tests.rs` for `mod.rs` modules
- preserved the existing `cfg(...)` guards and module-local structure so
the refactor remains structural rather than behavioral

## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib` (`1653 passed; 0 failed; 5 ignored`)
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo fmt --check`
- `cargo shear`
2026-03-12 08:16:36 -07:00
Jack MousseauandGitHub 19d0949aab Handle pre-approved permissions in zsh fork (#14431) 2026-03-12 00:27:11 -07:00
viyatb-oaiandGitHub 04892b4ceb refactor: make bubblewrap the default Linux sandbox (#13996)
## Summary
- make bubblewrap the default Linux sandbox and keep
`use_legacy_landlock` as the only override
- remove `use_linux_sandbox_bwrap` from feature, config, schema, and
docs surfaces
- update Linux sandbox selection, CLI/config plumbing, and related
tests/docs to match the new default
- fold in the follow-up CI fixes for request-permissions responses and
Linux read-only sandbox error text
2026-03-11 23:31:18 -07:00
viyatb-oaiandGitHub c2d5458d67 fix: align core approvals with split sandbox policies (#14171)
## Stack

   fix: fail closed for unsupported split windows sandboxing #14172
   fix: preserve split filesystem semantics in linux sandbox #14173
-> fix: align core approvals with split sandbox policies #14171
   refactor: centralize filesystem permissions precedence #14174

## Why This PR Exists

This PR is intentionally narrower than the title may suggest.

Most of the original split-permissions migration already landed in the
earlier `#13434 -> #13453` stack. In particular:

- `#13439` already did the broad runtime plumbing for split filesystem
and network policies.
- `#13445` already moved `apply_patch` safety onto filesystem-policy
semantics.
- `#13448` already switched macOS Seatbelt generation to split policies.
- `#13449` and `#13453` already handled Linux helper and bubblewrap
enforcement.
- `#13440` already introduced the first protocol-side helpers for
deriving effective filesystem access.

The reason this PR still exists is that after the follow-on
`[permissions]` work and the new shared precedence helper in `#14174`, a
few core approval paths were still deciding behavior from the legacy
`SandboxPolicy` projection instead of the split filesystem policy that
actually carries the carveouts.

That means this PR is mostly a cleanup and alignment pass over the
remaining core consumers, not a fresh sandbox backend migration.

## What Is Actually New Here

- make unmatched-command fallback decisions consult
`FileSystemSandboxPolicy` instead of only legacy `DangerFullAccess` /
`ReadOnly` / `WorkspaceWrite` categories
- thread `file_system_sandbox_policy` into the shell, unified-exec, and
intercepted-exec approval paths so they all use the same split-policy
semantics
- keep `apply_patch` safety on the same effective-access rules as the
shared protocol helper, rather than letting it drift through
compatibility projections
- add loader-level regression coverage proving legacy `sandbox_mode`
config still builds split policies and round-trips back without semantic
drift

## What This PR Does Not Do

This PR does not introduce new platform backend enforcement on its own.

- Linux backend parity remains in `#14173`.
- Windows fail-closed handling remains in `#14172`.
- The shared precedence/model changes live in `#14174`.

## Files To Focus On

- `core/src/exec_policy.rs`: unmatched-command fallback and approval
rendering now read the split filesystem policy directly
- `core/src/tools/sandboxing.rs`: default exec-approval requirement keys
off `FileSystemSandboxPolicy.kind`
- `core/src/tools/handlers/shell.rs`: shell approval requests now carry
the split filesystem policy
- `core/src/unified_exec/process_manager.rs`: unified-exec approval
requests now carry the split filesystem policy
- `core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs`: intercepted exec
fallback now uses the same split-policy approval semantics
- `core/src/safety.rs`: `apply_patch` safety keeps using effective
filesystem access rather than legacy sandbox categories
- `core/src/config/config_tests.rs`: new regression coverage for legacy
`sandbox_mode` no-drift behavior through the split-policy loader

## Notes

- `core/src/codex.rs` and `core/src/codex_tests.rs` are just small
fallout updates for `RequestPermissionsResponse.scope`; they are not the
point of the PR.
- If you reviewed the earlier `#13439` / `#13445` stack, the main review
question here is simply: “are there any remaining approval or
patch-safety paths that still reconstruct semantics from legacy
`SandboxPolicy` instead of consuming the split filesystem policy
directly?”

## Testing
- cargo test -p codex-core
legacy_sandbox_mode_config_builds_split_policies_without_drift
- cargo test -p codex-core request_permissions
- cargo test -p codex-core intercepted_exec_policy
- cargo test -p codex-core
restricted_sandbox_requires_exec_approval_on_request
- cargo test -p codex-core
unmatched_on_request_uses_split_filesystem_policy_for_escalation_prompts
- cargo test -p codex-core explicit_
- cargo clippy -p codex-core --tests -- -D warnings
2026-03-12 02:23:22 +00:00
Celia ChenandMichael Bolin c1a424691f chore: add a separate reject-policy flag for skill approvals (#14271)
## Summary
- add `skill_approval` to `RejectConfig` and the app-server v2
`AskForApproval::Reject` payload so skill-script prompts can be
configured independently from sandbox and rule-based prompts
- update Unix shell escalation to reject prompts based on the actual
decision source, keeping prefix rules tied to `rules`, unmatched command
fallbacks tied to `sandbox_approval`, and skill scripts tied to
`skill_approval`
- regenerate the affected protocol/config schemas and expand
unit/integration coverage for the new flag and skill approval behavior
2026-03-11 12:33:09 -07:00
Leo ShimonakaandMichael Bolin 889b4796fc feat: Add additional macOS Sandbox Permissions for Launch Services, Contacts, Reminders (#14155)
Add additional macOS Sandbox Permissions levers for the following:

- Launch Services
- Contacts
- Reminders
2026-03-11 12:33:09 -07:00
Dylan HurdandGitHub 6da84efed8 feat(approvals) RejectConfig for request_permissions (#14118)
## Summary
We need to support allowing request_permissions calls when using
`Reject` policy

<img width="1133" height="588" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 12 06
40 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8df987f-c225-4866-b8ab-5590960daec5"
/>

Note that this is a backwards-incompatible change for Reject policy. I'm
not sure if we need to add a default based on our current use/setup

## Testing
- [x] Added tests
- [x] Tested locally
2026-03-09 18:16:54 -07:00
c1defcc98c fix(core) RequestPermissions + ApplyPatch (#14055)
## Summary
The apply_patch tool should also respect AdditionalPermissions

## Testing
- [x] Added unit tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-09 16:11:19 -07:00
f23fcd6ced guardian initial feedback / tweaks (#13897)
## Summary
- remove the remaining model-visible guardian-specific `on-request`
prompt additions so enabling the feature does not change the main
approval-policy instructions
- neutralize user-facing guardian wording to talk about automatic
approval review / approval requests rather than a second reviewer or
only sandbox escalations
- tighten guardian retry-context handling so agent-authored
`justification` stays in the structured action JSON and is not also
injected as raw retry context
- simplify guardian review plumbing in core by deleting dead
prompt-append paths and trimming some request/transcript setup code

## Notable Changes
- delete the dead `permissions/approval_policy/guardian.md` append path
and stop threading `guardian_approval_enabled` through model-facing
developer-instruction builders
- rename the experimental feature copy to `Automatic approval review`
and update the `/experimental` snapshot text accordingly
- make approval-review status strings generic across shell, patch,
network, and MCP review types
- forward real sandbox/network retry reasons for shell and unified-exec
guardian review, but do not pass agent-authored justification as raw
retry context
- simplify `guardian.rs` by removing the one-field request wrapper,
deduping reasoning-effort selection, and cleaning up transcript entry
collection

## Testing
- `just fmt`
- full validation left to CI

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-09 09:25:24 -07:00
Celia ChenandGitHub 340f9c9ecb app-server: include experimental skill metadata in exec approval requests (#13929)
## Summary

This change surfaces skill metadata on command approval requests so
app-server clients can tell when an approval came from a skill script
and identify the originating `SKILL.md`.

- add `skill_metadata` to exec approval events in the shared protocol
- thread skill metadata through core shell escalation and delegated
approval handling for skill-triggered approvals
- expose the field in app-server v2 as experimental `skillMetadata`
- regenerate the JSON/TypeScript schemas and cover the new field in
protocol, transport, core, and TUI tests

## Why

Skill-triggered approvals already carry skill context inside core, but
app-server clients could not see which skill caused the prompt. Sending
the skill metadata with the approval request makes it possible for
clients to present better approval UX and connect the prompt back to the
relevant skill definition.


## example event in app-server-v2
verified that we see this event when experimental api is on:
```
< {
<   "id": 11,
<   "method": "item/commandExecution/requestApproval",
<   "params": {
<     "additionalPermissions": {
<       "fileSystem": null,
<       "macos": {
<         "accessibility": false,
<         "automations": {
<           "bundle_ids": [
<             "com.apple.Notes"
<           ]
<         },
<         "calendar": false,
<         "preferences": "read_only"
<       },
<       "network": null
<     },
<     "approvalId": "25d600ee-5a3c-4746-8d17-e2e61fb4c563",
<     "availableDecisions": [
<       "accept",
<       "acceptForSession",
<       "cancel"
<     ],
<     "command": "/Applications/ChatGPT.app/Contents/Resources/CodexAppServer_CodexAppServerBundledSkills.bundle/Contents/Resources/skills/apple-notes/scripts/notes_info",
<     "commandActions": [
<       {
<         "command": "/Applications/ChatGPT.app/Contents/Resources/CodexAppServer_CodexAppServerBundledSkills.bundle/Contents/Resources/skills/apple-notes/scripts/notes_info",
<         "type": "unknown"
<       }
<     ],
<     "cwd": "/Applications/ChatGPT.app/Contents/Resources/CodexAppServer_CodexAppServerBundledSkills.bundle/Contents/Resources/skills/apple-notes",
<     "itemId": "call_jZp3xFpNg4D8iKAD49cvEvZy",
<     "skillMetadata": {
<       "pathToSkillsMd": "/Applications/ChatGPT.app/Contents/Resources/CodexAppServer_CodexAppServerBundledSkills.bundle/Contents/Resources/skills/apple-notes/SKILL.md"
<     },
<     "threadId": "019ccc10-b7d3-7ff2-84fe-3a75e7681e69",
<     "turnId": "019ccc10-b848-76f1-81b3-4a1fa225493f"
<   }
< }`
```

& verified that this is the event when experimental api is off:
```
< {
<   "id": 13,
<   "method": "item/commandExecution/requestApproval",
<   "params": {
<     "approvalId": "5fbbf776-261b-4cf8-899b-c125b547f2c0",
<     "availableDecisions": [
<       "accept",
<       "acceptForSession",
<       "cancel"
<     ],
<     "command": "/Applications/ChatGPT.app/Contents/Resources/CodexAppServer_CodexAppServerBundledSkills.bundle/Contents/Resources/skills/apple-notes/scripts/notes_info",
<     "commandActions": [
<       {
<         "command": "/Applications/ChatGPT.app/Contents/Resources/CodexAppServer_CodexAppServerBundledSkills.bundle/Contents/Resources/skills/apple-notes/scripts/notes_info",
<         "type": "unknown"
<       }
<     ],
<     "cwd": "/Users/celia/code/codex/codex-rs",
<     "itemId": "call_OV2DHzTgYcbYtWaTTBWlocOt",
<     "threadId": "019ccc16-2a2b-7be1-8500-e00d45b892d4",
<     "turnId": "019ccc16-2a8e-7961-98ec-649600e7d06a"
<   }
< }
```
2026-03-08 18:07:46 -07:00
e84ee33cc0 Add guardian approval MVP (#13692)
## Summary
- add the guardian reviewer flow for `on-request` approvals in command,
patch, sandbox-retry, and managed-network approval paths
- keep guardian behind `features.guardian_approval` instead of exposing
a public `approval_policy = guardian` mode
- route ordinary `OnRequest` approvals to the guardian subagent when the
feature is enabled, without changing the public approval-mode surface

## Public model
- public approval modes stay unchanged
- guardian is enabled via `features.guardian_approval`
- when that feature is on, `approval_policy = on-request` keeps the same
approval boundaries but sends those approval requests to the guardian
reviewer instead of the user
- `/experimental` only persists the feature flag; it does not rewrite
`approval_policy`
- CLI and app-server no longer expose a separate `guardian` approval
mode in this PR

## Guardian reviewer
- the reviewer runs as a normal subagent and reuses the existing
subagent/thread machinery
- it is locked to a read-only sandbox and `approval_policy = never`
- it does not inherit user/project exec-policy rules
- it prefers `gpt-5.4` when the current provider exposes it, otherwise
falls back to the parent turn's active model
- it fail-closes on timeout, startup failure, malformed output, or any
other review error
- it currently auto-approves only when `risk_score < 80`

## Review context and policy
- guardian mirrors `OnRequest` approval semantics rather than
introducing a separate approval policy
- explicit `require_escalated` requests follow the same approval surface
as `OnRequest`; the difference is only who reviews them
- managed-network allowlist misses that enter the approval flow are also
reviewed by guardian
- the review prompt includes bounded recent transcript history plus
recent tool call/result evidence
- transcript entries and planned-action strings are truncated with
explicit `<guardian_truncated ... />` markers so large payloads stay
bounded
- apply-patch reviews include the full patch content (without
duplicating the structured `changes` payload)
- the guardian request layout is snapshot-tested using the same
model-visible Responses request formatter used elsewhere in core

## Guardian network behavior
- the guardian subagent inherits the parent session's managed-network
allowlist when one exists, so it can use the same approved network
surface while reviewing
- exact session-scoped network approvals are copied into the guardian
session with protocol/port scope preserved
- those copied approvals are now seeded before the guardian's first turn
is submitted, so inherited approvals are available during any immediate
review-time checks

## Out of scope / follow-ups
- the sandbox-permission validation split was pulled into a separate PR
and is not part of this diff
- a future follow-up can enable `serde_json` preserve-order in
`codex-core` and then simplify the guardian action rendering further

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-07 05:40:10 -08:00
Celia ChenandGitHub b0ce16c47a fix(core): respect reject policy by approval source for skill scripts (#13816)
## Summary
- distinguish reject-policy handling for prefix-rule approvals versus
sandbox approvals in Unix shell escalation
- keep prompting for skill-script execution when `rules=true` but
`sandbox_approval=false`, instead of denying the command up front
- add regression coverage for both skill-script reject-policy paths in
`codex-rs/core/tests/suite/skill_approval.rs`
2026-03-06 21:43:14 -08:00
22ac6b9aaa sandboxing: plumb split sandbox policies through runtime (#13439)
## Why

`#13434` introduces split `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` and
`NetworkSandboxPolicy`, but the runtime still made most execution-time
sandbox decisions from the legacy `SandboxPolicy` projection.

That projection loses information about combinations like unrestricted
filesystem access with restricted network access. In practice, that
means the runtime can choose the wrong platform sandbox behavior or set
the wrong network-restriction environment for a command even when config
has already separated those concerns.

This PR carries the split policies through the runtime so sandbox
selection, process spawning, and exec handling can consult the policy
that actually matters.

## What changed

- threaded `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` and `NetworkSandboxPolicy` through
`TurnContext`, `ExecRequest`, sandbox attempts, shell escalation state,
unified exec, and app-server exec overrides
- updated sandbox selection in `core/src/sandboxing/mod.rs` and
`core/src/exec.rs` to key off `FileSystemSandboxPolicy.kind` plus
`NetworkSandboxPolicy`, rather than inferring behavior only from the
legacy `SandboxPolicy`
- updated process spawning in `core/src/spawn.rs` and the platform
wrappers to use `NetworkSandboxPolicy` when deciding whether to set
`CODEX_SANDBOX_NETWORK_DISABLED`
- kept additional-permissions handling and legacy `ExternalSandbox`
compatibility projections aligned with the split policies, including
explicit user-shell execution and Windows restricted-token routing
- updated callers across `core`, `app-server`, and `linux-sandbox` to
pass the split policies explicitly

## Verification

- added regression coverage in `core/tests/suite/user_shell_cmd.rs` to
verify `RunUserShellCommand` does not inherit
`CODEX_SANDBOX_NETWORK_DISABLED` from the active turn
- added coverage in `core/src/exec.rs` for Windows restricted-token
sandbox selection when the legacy projection is `ExternalSandbox`
- updated Linux sandbox coverage in
`linux-sandbox/tests/suite/landlock.rs` to exercise the split-policy
exec path
- verified the current PR state with `just clippy`




---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/13439).
* #13453
* #13452
* #13451
* #13449
* #13448
* #13445
* #13440
* __->__ #13439

---------

Co-authored-by: viyatb-oai <viyatb@openai.com>
2026-03-07 02:30:21 +00:00
Celia ChenandGitHub 8b81284975 fix(core): skip exec approval for permissionless skill scripts (#13791)
## Summary

- Treat skill scripts with no permission profile, or an explicitly empty
one, as permissionless and run them with the turn's existing sandbox
instead of forcing an exec approval prompt.
- Keep the approval flow unchanged for skills that do declare additional
permissions.
- Update the skill approval tests to assert that permissionless skill
scripts do not prompt on either the initial run or a rerun.

## Why

Permissionless skills should inherit the current turn sandbox directly.
Prompting for exec approval in that case adds friction without granting
any additional capability.
2026-03-06 16:40:41 -08:00
Michael BolinandGitHub f82678b2a4 config: add initial support for the new permission profile config language in config.toml (#13434)
## Why

`SandboxPolicy` currently mixes together three separate concerns:

- parsing layered config from `config.toml`
- representing filesystem sandbox state
- carrying basic network policy alongside filesystem choices

That makes the existing config awkward to extend and blocks the new TOML
proposal where `[permissions]` becomes a table of named permission
profiles selected by `default_permissions`. (The idea is that if
`default_permissions` is not specified, we assume the user is opting
into the "traditional" way to configure the sandbox.)

This PR adds the config-side plumbing for those profiles while still
projecting back to the legacy `SandboxPolicy` shape that the current
macOS and Linux sandbox backends consume.

It also tightens the filesystem profile model so scoped entries only
exist for `:project_roots`, and so nested keys must stay within a
project root instead of using `.` or `..` traversal.

This drops support for the short-lived `[permissions.network]` in
`config.toml` because now that would be interpreted as a profile named
`network` within `[permissions]`.

## What Changed

- added `PermissionsToml`, `PermissionProfileToml`,
`FilesystemPermissionsToml`, and `FilesystemPermissionToml` so config
can parse named profiles under `[permissions.<profile>.filesystem]`
- added top-level `default_permissions` selection, validation for
missing or unknown profiles, and compilation from a named profile into
split `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` and `NetworkSandboxPolicy` values
- taught config loading to choose between the legacy `sandbox_mode` path
and the profile-based path without breaking legacy users
- introduced `codex-protocol::permissions` for the split filesystem and
network sandbox types, and stored those alongside the legacy projected
`sandbox_policy` in runtime `Permissions`
- modeled `FileSystemSpecialPath` so only `ProjectRoots` can carry a
nested `subpath`, matching the intended config syntax instead of
allowing invalid states for other special paths
- restricted scoped filesystem maps to `:project_roots`, with validation
that nested entries are non-empty descendant paths and cannot use `.` or
`..` to escape the project root
- kept existing runtime consumers working by projecting
`FileSystemSandboxPolicy` back into `SandboxPolicy`, with an explicit
error for profiles that request writes outside the workspace root
- loaded proxy settings from top-level `[network]`
- regenerated `core/config.schema.json`

## Verification

- added config coverage for profile deserialization,
`default_permissions` selection, top-level `[network]` loading, network
enablement, rejection of writes outside the workspace root, rejection of
nested entries for non-`:project_roots` special paths, and rejection of
parent-directory traversal in `:project_roots` maps
- added protocol coverage for the legacy bridge rejecting non-workspace
writes

## Docs

- update the Codex config docs on developers.openai.com/codex to
document named `[permissions.<profile>]` entries, `default_permissions`,
scoped `:project_roots` syntax, the descendant-path restriction for
nested `:project_roots` entries, and top-level `[network]` proxy
configuration






---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/13434).
* #13453
* #13452
* #13451
* #13449
* #13448
* #13445
* #13440
* #13439
* __->__ #13434
2026-03-06 15:39:13 -08:00
iceweasel-oaiandGitHub 14de492985 copy current exe to CODEX_HOME/.sandbox-bin for apply_patch (#13669)
We do this for codex-command-runner.exe as well for the same reason.
Windows sandbox users cannot execute binaries in the WindowsApp/
installed directory for the Codex App. This causes apply-patch to fail
because it tries to execute codex.exe as the sandbox user.
2026-03-05 22:15:10 -08:00
Celia ChenandGitHub aaefee04cd core/protocol: add structured macOS additional permissions and merge them into sandbox execution (#13499)
## Summary
- Introduce strongly-typed macOS additional permissions across
protocol/core/app-server boundaries.
- Merge additional permissions into effective sandbox execution,
including macOS seatbelt profile extensions.
- Expand docs, schema/tool definitions, UI rendering, and tests for
`network`, `file_system`, and `macos` additional permissions.
2026-03-05 16:21:45 -08:00
Celia ChenandGitHub a63624a61a feat: merge skill permission profiles into the turn sandbox for zsh-fork execs (#13496)
## Summary

This changes the Unix shell escalation path for skill-matched
executables to apply a skill's `PermissionProfile` as additive
permissions on top of the existing turn/request sandbox policy.

Previously, skill-matched executables compiled the skill permission
profile into a standalone sandbox policy and executed against that
replacement policy. Now they go through the same
`additional_permissions` merge path used elsewhere in shell sandbox
preparation.

## What Changed

- Changed `skill_escalation_execution()` to return
`EscalationPermissions::PermissionProfile(...)` for non-empty skill
permission profiles.
- Kept empty or missing skill permission profiles on the `TurnDefault`
path.
- Added tests covering the new additive skill-permission behavior.
- Added inline comments in `prepare_escalated_exec()` clarifying the
difference between additive permission merging and fully specified
replacement sandbox policies.
- Removed the now-unused skill permission compiler module after
switching this path away from standalone compiled skill sandbox
policies.

## Testing

- Ran `just fmt` in `codex-rs`
- Ran `cargo test -p codex-core`

`cargo test -p codex-core` still hits an unrelated existing failure:
`shell_snapshot::tests::snapshot_shell_does_not_inherit_stdin`

## Follow-up

This change intentionally does not merge skill-specific macOS seatbelt
profile extensions through the `additional_permissions` path yet.
Filesystem and network permissions now follow the additive merge path,
but seatbelt extension permissions still need separate handling in a
follow-up PR.
2026-03-05 20:05:35 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub b4cb989563 refactor: prepare unified exec for zsh-fork backend (#13392)
## Why

`shell_zsh_fork` already provides stronger guarantees around which
executables receive elevated permissions. To reuse that machinery from
unified exec without pushing Unix-specific escalation details through
generic runtime code, the escalation bootstrap and session lifetime
handling need a cleaner boundary.

That boundary also needs to be safe for long-lived sessions: when an
intercepted shell session is closed or pruned, any in-flight approval
workers and any already-approved escalated child they spawned must be
torn down with the session, and the inherited escalation socket must not
leak into unrelated subprocesses.

## What Changed

- Extracted a reusable `EscalationSession` and
`EscalateServer::start_session(...)` in `shell-escalation` so callers
can get the wrapper/socket env overlay and keep the escalation server
alive without immediately running a one-shot command.
- Documented that `EscalationSession::env()` and
`ShellCommandExecutor::run(...)` exchange only that env overlay, which
callers must merge into their own base shell environment.
- Clarified the prepared-exec helper boundary in `core` by naming the
new helper APIs around `ExecRequest`, while keeping the legacy
`execute_env(...)` entrypoints as thin compatibility wrappers for
existing callers that still use the older naming.
- Added a small post-spawn hook on the prepared execution path so the
parent copy of the inheritable escalation socket is closed immediately
after both the existing one-shot shell-command spawn and the
unified-exec spawn.
- Made session teardown explicit with session-scoped cancellation:
dropping an `EscalationSession` or canceling its parent request now
stops intercept workers, and the server-spawned escalated child uses
`kill_on_drop(true)` so teardown cannot orphan an already-approved
child.
- Added `UnifiedExecBackendConfig` plumbing through `ToolsConfig`, a
`shell::zsh_fork_backend` facade, and an opaque unified-exec
spawn-lifecycle hook so unified exec can prepare a wrapped `zsh -c/-lc`
request without storing `EscalationSession` directly in generic
process/runtime code.
- Kept the existing `shell_command` zsh-fork behavior intact on top of
the new bootstrap path. Tool selection is unchanged in this PR: when
`shell_zsh_fork` is enabled, `ShellCommand` still wins over
`exec_command`.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-shell-escalation`
  - includes coverage for `start_session_exposes_wrapper_env_overlay`
  - includes coverage for `exec_closes_parent_socket_after_shell_spawn`
- includes coverage for
`dropping_session_aborts_intercept_workers_and_kills_spawned_child`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
shell_zsh_fork_prefers_shell_command_over_unified_exec`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --test all
shell_zsh_fork_prompts_for_skill_script_execution`


---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/13392).
* #13432
* __->__ #13392
2026-03-05 08:55:12 +00:00
Celia ChenandGitHub 0bb152b01d chore: remove SkillMetadata.permissions and derive skill sandboxing from permission_profile (#13061)
## Summary

This change removes the compiled permissions field from skill metadata
and keeps permission_profile as the single source of truth.

Skill loading no longer compiles skill permissions eagerly. Instead, the
zsh-fork skill escalation path compiles `skill.permission_profile` when
it needs to determine the sandbox to apply for a skill script.

  ## Behavior change

  For skills that declare:
```
  permissions: {}
```
we now treat that the same as having no skill permissions override,
instead of creating and using a default readonly sandbox. This change
makes the behavior more intuitive:

  - only non-empty skill permission profiles affect sandboxing
- omitting permissions and writing permissions: {} now mean the same
thing
- skill metadata keeps a single permissions representation instead of
storing derived state too

Overall, this makes skill sandbox behavior easier to understand and more
predictable.
2026-03-03 01:29:53 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 1a8d930267 core: adopt host_executable() rules in zsh-fork (#13046)
## Why

[#12964](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/12964) added
`host_executable()` support to `codex-execpolicy`, but the zsh-fork
interception path in `unix_escalation.rs` was still evaluating commands
with the default exact-token matcher.

That meant an intercepted absolute executable such as `/usr/bin/git
status` could still miss basename rules like `prefix_rule(pattern =
["git", "status"])`, even when the policy also defined a matching
`host_executable(name = "git", ...)` entry.

This PR adopts the new matching behavior in the zsh-fork runtime only.
That keeps the rollout intentionally narrow: zsh-fork already requires
explicit user opt-in, so it is a safer first caller to exercise the new
`host_executable()` scheme before expanding it to other execpolicy call
sites.

It also brings zsh-fork back in line with the current `prefix_rule()`
execution model. Until prefix rules can carry their own permission
profiles, a matched `prefix_rule()` is expected to rerun the intercepted
command unsandboxed on `allow`, or after the user accepts `prompt`,
instead of merely continuing inside the inherited shell sandbox.

## What Changed

- added `evaluate_intercepted_exec_policy()` in
`core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs` to centralize
execpolicy evaluation for intercepted commands
- switched intercepted direct execs in the zsh-fork path to
`check_multiple_with_options(...)` with `MatchOptions {
resolve_host_executables: true }`
- added `commands_for_intercepted_exec_policy()` so zsh-fork policy
evaluation works from intercepted `(program, argv)` data instead of
reconstructing a synthetic command before matching
- left shell-wrapper parsing intentionally disabled by default behind
`ENABLE_INTERCEPTED_EXEC_POLICY_SHELL_WRAPPER_PARSING`, so
path-sensitive matching relies on later direct exec interception rather
than shell-script parsing
- made matched `prefix_rule()` decisions rerun intercepted commands with
`EscalationExecution::Unsandboxed`, while unmatched-command fallback
keeps the existing sandbox-preserving behavior
- extracted the zsh-fork test harness into
`core/tests/common/zsh_fork.rs` so both the skill-focused and
approval-focused integration suites can exercise the same runtime setup
- limited this change to the intercepted zsh-fork path rather than
changing every execpolicy caller at once
- added runtime coverage in
`core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation_tests.rs` for allowed and
disallowed `host_executable()` mappings and the wrapper-parsing modes
- added integration coverage in `core/tests/suite/approvals.rs` to
verify a saved `prefix_rule(pattern=["touch"], decision="allow")` reruns
under zsh-fork outside a restrictive `WorkspaceWrite` sandbox

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/13046).
* #13065
* __->__ #13046
2026-02-28 01:41:23 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub d09a7535ed fix: use AbsolutePathBuf for permission profile file roots (#12970)
## Why
`PermissionProfile` should describe filesystem roots as absolute paths
at the type level. Using `PathBuf` in `FileSystemPermissions` made the
shared type too permissive and blurred together three different
deserialization cases:

- skill metadata in `agents/openai.yaml`, where relative paths should
resolve against the skill directory
- app-server API payloads, where callers should have to send absolute
paths
- local tool-call payloads for commands like `shell_command` and
`exec_command`, where `additional_permissions.file_system` may
legitimately be relative to the command `workdir`

This change tightens the shared model without regressing the existing
local command flow.

## What Changed
- changed `protocol::models::FileSystemPermissions` and the app-server
`AdditionalFileSystemPermissions` mirror to use `AbsolutePathBuf`
- wrapped skill metadata deserialization in `AbsolutePathBufGuard`, so
relative permission roots in `agents/openai.yaml` resolve against the
containing skill directory
- kept app-server/API deserialization strict, so relative
`additionalPermissions.fileSystem.*` paths are rejected at the boundary
- restored cwd/workdir-relative deserialization for local tool-call
payloads by parsing `shell`, `shell_command`, and `exec_command`
arguments under an `AbsolutePathBufGuard` rooted at the resolved command
working directory
- simplified runtime additional-permission normalization so it only
canonicalizes and deduplicates absolute roots instead of trying to
recover relative ones later
- updated the app-server schema fixtures, `app-server/README.md`, and
the affected transport/TUI tests to match the final behavior
2026-02-27 17:42:52 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 4cb086d96f test: move unix_escalation tests into sibling file (#12957)
## Why

`unix_escalation.rs` had a large inline `mod tests` block that made the
implementation harder to scan. This change moves those tests into a
sibling file while keeping them as a child module, so they can still
exercise private items without widening visibility.

## What Changed

- replaced the inline `#[cfg(test)] mod tests` block in
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs` with a
path-based test module declaration
- moved the existing unit tests into
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation_tests.rs`
- kept the extracted tests using `super::...` imports so they continue
to access private helpers and types from `unix_escalation.rs`

## Testing

- `cargo test -p codex-core unix_escalation::tests`
2026-02-26 23:15:28 +00:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 7fa9d9ae35 feat: include sandbox config with escalation request (#12839)
## Why

Before this change, an escalation approval could say that a command
should be rerun, but it could not carry the sandbox configuration that
should still apply when the escalated command is actually spawned.

That left an unsafe gap in the `zsh-fork` skill path: skill scripts
under `scripts/` that did not declare permissions could be escalated
without a sandbox, and scripts that did declare permissions could lose
their bounded sandbox on rerun or cached session approval.

This PR extends the escalation protocol so approvals can optionally
carry sandbox configuration all the way through execution. That lets the
shell runtime preserve the intended sandbox instead of silently widening
access.

We likely want a single permissions type for this codepath eventually,
probably centered on `Permissions`. For now, the protocol needs to
represent both the existing `PermissionProfile` form and the fuller
`Permissions` form, so this introduces a temporary disjoint union,
`EscalationPermissions`, to carry either one.

Further, this means that today, a skill either:

- does not declare any permissions, in which case it is run using the
default sandbox for the turn
- specifies permissions, in which case the skill is run using that exact
sandbox, which might be more restrictive than the default sandbox for
the turn

We will likely change the skill's permissions to be additive to the
existing permissions for the turn.

## What Changed

- Added `EscalationPermissions` to `codex-protocol` so escalation
requests can carry either a `PermissionProfile` or a full `Permissions`
payload.
- Added an explicit `EscalationExecution` mode to the shell escalation
protocol so reruns distinguish between `Unsandboxed`, `TurnDefault`, and
`Permissions(...)` instead of overloading `None`.
- Updated `zsh-fork` shell reruns to resolve `TurnDefault` at execution
time, which keeps ordinary `UseDefault` commands on the turn sandbox and
preserves turn-level macOS seatbelt profile extensions.
- Updated the `zsh-fork` skill path so a skill with no declared
permissions inherits the conversation's effective sandbox instead of
escalating unsandboxed.
- Updated the `zsh-fork` skill path so a skill with declared permissions
reruns with exactly those permissions, including when a cached session
approval is reused.

## Testing

- Added unit coverage in
`core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs` for the explicit
`UseDefault` / `RequireEscalated` / `WithAdditionalPermissions`
execution mapping.
- Added unit coverage in
`core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs` for macOS seatbelt
extension preservation in both the `TurnDefault` and
explicit-permissions rerun paths.
- Added integration coverage in `core/tests/suite/skill_approval.rs` for
permissionless skills inheriting the turn sandbox and explicit skill
permissions remaining bounded across cached approval reuse.
2026-02-26 12:00:18 -08:00
Michael BolinandGitHub 14116ade8d feat: include available decisions in command approval requests (#12758)
Command-approval clients currently infer which choices to show from
side-channel fields like `networkApprovalContext`,
`proposedExecpolicyAmendment`, and `additionalPermissions`. That makes
the request shape harder to evolve, and it forces each client to
replicate the server's heuristics instead of receiving the exact
decision list for the prompt.

This PR introduces a mapping between `CommandExecutionApprovalDecision`
and `codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision`:

```rust
impl From<CoreReviewDecision> for CommandExecutionApprovalDecision {
    fn from(value: CoreReviewDecision) -> Self {
        match value {
            CoreReviewDecision::Approved => Self::Accept,
            CoreReviewDecision::ApprovedExecpolicyAmendment {
                proposed_execpolicy_amendment,
            } => Self::AcceptWithExecpolicyAmendment {
                execpolicy_amendment: proposed_execpolicy_amendment.into(),
            },
            CoreReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => Self::AcceptForSession,
            CoreReviewDecision::NetworkPolicyAmendment {
                network_policy_amendment,
            } => Self::ApplyNetworkPolicyAmendment {
                network_policy_amendment: network_policy_amendment.into(),
            },
            CoreReviewDecision::Abort => Self::Cancel,
            CoreReviewDecision::Denied => Self::Decline,
        }
    }
}
```

And updates `CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams` to have a new field:

```rust
available_decisions: Option<Vec<CommandExecutionApprovalDecision>>
```

when, if specified, should make it easier for clients to display an
appropriate list of options in the UI.

This makes it possible for `CoreShellActionProvider::prompt()` in
`unix_escalation.rs` to specify the `Vec<ReviewDecision>` directly,
adding support for `ApprovedForSession` when approving a skill script,
which was previously missing in the TUI.

Note this results in a significant change to `exec_options()` in
`approval_overlay.rs`, as the displayed options are now derived from
`available_decisions: &[ReviewDecision]`.

## What Changed

- Add `available_decisions` to
[`ExecApprovalRequestEvent`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/de00e932dd9801de0a4faac0519162099753f331/codex-rs/protocol/src/approvals.rs#L111-L175),
including helpers to derive the legacy default choices when older
senders omit the field.
- Map `codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision` to app-server
`CommandExecutionApprovalDecision` and expose the ordered list as
experimental `availableDecisions` in
[`CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/de00e932dd9801de0a4faac0519162099753f331/codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2.rs#L3798-L3807).
- Thread optional `available_decisions` through the core approval path
so Unix shell escalation can explicitly request `ApprovedForSession` for
session-scoped approvals instead of relying on client heuristics.
[`unix_escalation.rs`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/de00e932dd9801de0a4faac0519162099753f331/codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs#L194-L214)
- Update the TUI approval overlay to build its buttons from the ordered
decision list, while preserving the legacy fallback when
`available_decisions` is missing.
- Update the app-server README, test client output, and generated schema
artifacts to document and surface the new field.

## Testing

- Add `approval_overlay.rs` coverage for explicit decision lists,
including the generic `ApprovedForSession` path and network approval
options.
- Update `chatwidget/tests.rs` and app-server protocol tests to populate
the new optional field and keep older event shapes working.

## Developers Docs

- If we document `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` on
[developers.openai.com/codex](https://developers.openai.com/codex), add
experimental `availableDecisions` as the preferred source of approval
choices and note that older servers may omit it.
2026-02-26 01:10:46 +00:00