Ahmed Ibrahim
5577a9e148
## Why Some models need to select their code-execution behavior through model catalog metadata. Models without that metadata must continue to follow the existing `CodeMode` and `CodeModeOnly` feature flags, including when a newer server sends an enum value this client does not recognize. ## What changed - add optional `ModelInfo.tool_mode` metadata with `direct`, `code_mode`, and `code_mode_only` - treat omitted and unknown wire values as `None` - resolve `None` from the existing feature flags - carry the resolved `ToolMode` directly on `TurnContext`, outside `Config` - use the resolved value for turn creation, model switches, review turns, tool planning, and code execution ## Coverage - add protocol coverage for omitted, known, and unknown enum values - add focused coverage for flag fallback and explicit metadata overriding feature flags - add core integration coverage that fetches remote model metadata through `/v1/models` and verifies the outbound `/responses` tools for explicit `direct` and `code_mode_only` selectors ## Stack - followed by #25032
codex-tools
codex-tools is the shared support crate for building, adapting, and executing
model-visible tools outside codex-core.
Today this crate owns the host-facing tool models and helpers that no longer
need to live in core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:
- aggregate host models such as
ToolSpec,ConfiguredToolSpec,LoadableToolSpec,ResponsesApiNamespace, andResponsesApiNamespaceTool - host discovery models used while assembling tool sets, including discoverable-tool models and request-plugin-install helpers
- host adapters such as schema sanitization, MCP/dynamic conversion, code-mode augmentation, and image-detail normalization
- shared executable-tool contracts such as
ToolExecutor,ToolCall, andToolOutput
That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to
move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is
to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping
compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding
boundaries are ready.
Vision
Over time, this crate should hold host-side tool machinery that is shared by multiple consumers, for example:
- host-visible aggregate tool models
- tool-set planning and discovery helpers
- MCP and dynamic-tool adaptation into Responses API shapes
- code-mode compatibility shims that do not depend on
codex-core - other narrowly scoped host utilities that multiple crates need
The corresponding non-goals are just as important:
- do not move
codex-coreorchestration here prematurely - do not pull
Session/TurnContext/ approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces - do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code
Migration approach
The expected migration shape is:
- Keep extension-owned executable-tool authoring in
codex-extension-api. - Move host-side planning/adaptation helpers here when they no longer need to
stay coupled to
codex-core. - Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in
codex-corewhile downstream call sites are updated. - Only extract higher-level host infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.
Crate conventions
This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it
stays easy to grow:
src/lib.rsshould remain exports-only.- Business logic should live in named module files such as
foo.rs. - Unit tests for
foo.rsshould live in a siblingfoo_tests.rs. - The implementation file should wire tests with:
#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;
If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from
codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding
more here.