## Why
`SandboxPolicy` is now a legacy compatibility shape, but several tests
still built a `SandboxPolicy` only to immediately convert it into
`PermissionProfile` for APIs that already accept canonical runtime
permissions. Those detours make it harder to audit where legacy sandbox
policy is still required, because boundary-only usages are mixed
together with ordinary test setup.
## What Changed
- Updated tests in `codex-core`, `codex-exec`, `codex-analytics`, and
`codex-config` to construct `PermissionProfile` values directly when the
code under test takes a permission profile.
- Changed exec-policy, request-permissions, session, and sandbox test
helpers to pass `PermissionProfile` through instead of converting from
`SandboxPolicy` internally.
- Left `SandboxPolicy` in place where tests are explicitly exercising
legacy compatibility or request/response boundaries.
## Test Plan
- `cargo test -p codex-analytics -p codex-config`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib safety::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib exec_policy::tests::`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib exec::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib guardian_review_session_config`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::network_approval::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib
tools::runtimes::shell::unix_escalation::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib managed_network`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --test all request_permissions::`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec sandbox`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/23030).
* #23036
* __->__ #23030
Michael BolinandGitHub
d91bc15618