mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
Felipe Coury
e093d81982
## Why Interactive `codex resume` and `codex fork` expose both a session ID positional and an initial prompt positional. With `--last`, Clap still assigns the first positional to the session ID, so a command such as `codex fork --last "/compact focus on auth"` either fails parsing or attempts to look up the prompt as a session ID instead of sending it to the latest session. This makes it impossible to select the latest session and immediately provide a follow-up prompt, even though `codex exec resume --last` already supports that workflow. <img width="1746" height="1024" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-06 at 17 00 47@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/86885c07-a23c-48ee-b0ee-47f2484f6eb7" /> ## What Changed - Reinterpret the first positional as the initial prompt when interactive `resume --last` or `fork --last` is used and no explicit second prompt was parsed. - Preserve the existing `resume SESSION_ID PROMPT` and `fork SESSION_ID PROMPT` behavior. - Add parser-level regression coverage for latest-session and explicit-session prompt forms. ## How to Test 1. Start an interactive session, exit it, then run `codex resume --last "continue from the latest session"`. 2. Confirm Codex resumes the latest session and submits the supplied prompt instead of treating it as a session ID. 3. Run `codex fork --last "take a different approach"`. 4. Confirm Codex forks the latest session and submits the supplied prompt. 5. Also verify `codex resume SESSION_ID "continue here"` and `codex fork SESSION_ID "branch here"` still target the explicit session and submit the prompt. Targeted tests: - `just test -p codex-cli` (267 passed)
e093d81982
ยท
2026-06-07 17:34:35 -04:00
History