Files
codex/codex-rs/tools
T
mchen-oai af99f6a72f core: cache the tool search handler per session (#27258)
## Why

Tool router construction rebuilds the deferred-tool BM25 index during
session initialization and before each sampling continuation, even when
the searchable tool metadata is unchanged. Local profiling measured
`append_tool_search_executor` at roughly 113 ms per continuation, making
repeated index construction the largest measured router-building cost.

## What changed

- Add a session-scoped `ToolSearchHandlerCache` so continuations and
user turns can reuse the existing handler.
- Key reuse on the complete ordered `Vec<ToolSearchInfo>`, rebuilding
when searchable text, loadable tool specs, source metadata, or ordering
changes.
- Build handlers outside the cache lock and recheck before publishing
them, avoiding holding the mutex during index construction.

## Verification

- `cache_reuses_identical_search_infos_and_rebuilds_changed_inputs`
covers exact cache reuse and invalidation when the ordered search
metadata changes.
- Local rollout profiling showed the initial router build populating the
cache and unchanged later continuations reusing it:
  - uncached: 118 ms median across 14 spans from 3 rollouts
  - cached: 4 ms median across 12 spans from 3 rollouts
af99f6a72f ยท 2026-06-15 14:48:30 -07:00
History
..

codex-tools

codex-tools is the shared support crate for building, adapting, and executing model-visible tools outside codex-core.

Today this crate owns the host-facing tool models and helpers that no longer need to live in core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:

  • aggregate host models such as ToolSpec, ConfiguredToolSpec, LoadableToolSpec, ResponsesApiNamespace, and ResponsesApiNamespaceTool
  • host discovery models used while assembling tool sets, including discoverable-tool models and request-plugin-install helpers
  • host adapters such as schema sanitization, MCP/dynamic conversion, code-mode augmentation, and image-detail normalization
  • shared executable-tool contracts such as ToolExecutor, ToolCall, and ToolOutput

That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding boundaries are ready.

Vision

Over time, this crate should hold host-side tool machinery that is shared by multiple consumers, for example:

  • host-visible aggregate tool models
  • tool-set planning and discovery helpers
  • MCP and dynamic-tool adaptation into Responses API shapes
  • code-mode compatibility shims that do not depend on codex-core
  • other narrowly scoped host utilities that multiple crates need

The corresponding non-goals are just as important:

  • do not move codex-core orchestration here prematurely
  • do not pull Session / TurnContext / approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces
  • do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code

Migration approach

The expected migration shape is:

  1. Keep extension-owned executable-tool authoring in codex-extension-api.
  2. Move host-side planning/adaptation helpers here when they no longer need to stay coupled to codex-core.
  3. Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in codex-core while downstream call sites are updated.
  4. Only extract higher-level host infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.

Crate conventions

This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it stays easy to grow:

  • src/lib.rs should remain exports-only.
  • Business logic should live in named module files such as foo.rs.
  • Unit tests for foo.rs should live in a sibling foo_tests.rs.
  • The implementation file should wire tests with:
#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;

If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding more here.