mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
66447d5d2c
We started working with MCP in Codex before https://crates.io/crates/rmcp was mature, so we had our own crate for MCP types that was generated from the MCP schema: https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/8b95d3e082376f4cb23e92641705a22afb28a9da/codex-rs/mcp-types/README.md Now that `rmcp` is more mature, it makes more sense to use their MCP types in Rust, as they handle details (like the `_meta` field) that our custom version ignored. Though one advantage that our custom types had is that our generated types implemented `JsonSchema` and `ts_rs::TS`, whereas the types in `rmcp` do not. As such, part of the work of this PR is leveraging the adapters between `rmcp` types and the serializable types that are API for us (app server and MCP) introduced in #10356. Note this PR results in a number of changes to `codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema`, which merit special attention during review. We must ensure that these changes are still backwards-compatible, which is possible because we have: ```diff - export type CallToolResult = { content: Array<ContentBlock>, isError?: boolean, structuredContent?: JsonValue, }; + export type CallToolResult = { content: Array<JsonValue>, structuredContent?: JsonValue, isError?: boolean, _meta?: JsonValue, }; ``` so `ContentBlock` has been replaced with the more general `JsonValue`. Note that `ContentBlock` was defined as: ```typescript export type ContentBlock = TextContent | ImageContent | AudioContent | ResourceLink | EmbeddedResource; ``` so the deletion of those individual variants should not be a cause of great concern. Similarly, we have the following change in `codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema/typescript/Tool.ts`: ``` - export type Tool = { annotations?: ToolAnnotations, description?: string, inputSchema: ToolInputSchema, name: string, outputSchema?: ToolOutputSchema, title?: string, }; + export type Tool = { name: string, title?: string, description?: string, inputSchema: JsonValue, outputSchema?: JsonValue, annotations?: JsonValue, icons?: Array<JsonValue>, _meta?: JsonValue, }; ``` so: - `annotations?: ToolAnnotations` ➡️ `JsonValue` - `inputSchema: ToolInputSchema` ➡️ `JsonValue` - `outputSchema?: ToolOutputSchema` ➡️ `JsonValue` and two new fields: `icons?: Array<JsonValue>, _meta?: JsonValue` --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/10349). * #10357 * __->__ #10349 * #10356
66447d5d2c
·
2026-02-02 17:41:55 -08:00
History