## Why This is another small step in the `codex-core` -> `codex-tools` migration described in `AGENTS.md`. `core/src/tools/spec.rs` and `core/src/tools/code_mode/mod.rs` were both hand-rolling the same pure transformation: convert visible `ToolSpec`s into code-mode nested tool definitions, then sort and deduplicate by tool name. That logic does not depend on core runtime state or handlers, so keeping it in `codex-core` makes `spec.rs` harder to peel out later than it needs to be. ## What Changed - Add `collect_code_mode_tool_definitions()` to `codex-rs/tools/src/code_mode.rs`. - Reuse that helper from `codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec.rs` when assembling the `exec` tool description. - Reuse the same helper from `codex-rs/core/src/tools/code_mode/mod.rs` when exposing nested tool metadata to the code-mode runtime. This is intended to be a straight refactor with no behavior change and no new test surface. ## Verification - `cargo test -p codex-tools` - `cargo test -p codex-core tools::spec::tests` - `cargo test -p codex-core code_mode_only_`
codex-tools
codex-tools is intended to become the home for tool-related code that is
shared across multiple crates and does not need to stay coupled to
codex-core.
Today this crate is intentionally small. It currently owns the shared tool
schema and Responses API tool primitives that no longer need to live in
core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:
JsonSchemaAdditionalPropertiesToolDefinitionToolSpecConfiguredToolSpecResponsesApiToolFreeformToolFreeformToolFormatToolSearchOutputToolResponsesApiWebSearchFiltersResponsesApiWebSearchUserLocationResponsesApiNamespaceResponsesApiNamespaceTool- code-mode
ToolSpecadapters andexec/waitspec builders - JS REPL spec builders
- MCP resource,
list_dir, andtest_sync_toolspec builders - local host tool spec builders for shell/exec/request-permissions/view-image
- collaboration and agent-job
ToolSpecbuilders for spawn/send/wait/close,request_user_input, and CSV fanout/reporting - discoverable-tool models, client filtering, and
ToolSpecbuilders fortool_searchandtool_suggest parse_tool_input_schema()parse_dynamic_tool()parse_mcp_tool()create_tools_json_for_responses_api()mcp_call_tool_result_output_schema()tool_definition_to_responses_api_tool()dynamic_tool_to_responses_api_tool()mcp_tool_to_responses_api_tool()mcp_tool_to_deferred_responses_api_tool()augment_tool_spec_for_code_mode()tool_spec_to_code_mode_tool_definition()
That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to
move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is
to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping
compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding
boundaries are ready.
Vision
Over time, this crate should hold tool-facing primitives that are shared by multiple consumers, for example:
- schema and spec data models
- tool input/output parsing helpers
- tool metadata and compatibility shims that do not depend on
codex-core - other narrowly scoped utility code that multiple crates need
The corresponding non-goals are just as important:
- do not move
codex-coreorchestration here prematurely - do not pull
Session/TurnContext/ approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces - do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code
Migration approach
The expected migration shape is:
- Move low-coupling tool primitives here.
- Switch non-core consumers to depend on
codex-toolsdirectly. - Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in
codex-corewhile downstream call sites are updated. - Only extract higher-level tool infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.
That means it is normal for codex-core to temporarily re-export types or
helpers from codex-tools during the transition.
Crate conventions
This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it
stays easy to grow:
src/lib.rsshould remain exports-only.- Business logic should live in named module files such as
foo.rs. - Unit tests for
foo.rsshould live in a siblingfoo_tests.rs. - The implementation file should wire tests with:
#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;
If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from
codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding
more here.