mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
14116ade8d
Command-approval clients currently infer which choices to show from
side-channel fields like `networkApprovalContext`,
`proposedExecpolicyAmendment`, and `additionalPermissions`. That makes
the request shape harder to evolve, and it forces each client to
replicate the server's heuristics instead of receiving the exact
decision list for the prompt.
This PR introduces a mapping between `CommandExecutionApprovalDecision`
and `codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision`:
```rust
impl From<CoreReviewDecision> for CommandExecutionApprovalDecision {
fn from(value: CoreReviewDecision) -> Self {
match value {
CoreReviewDecision::Approved => Self::Accept,
CoreReviewDecision::ApprovedExecpolicyAmendment {
proposed_execpolicy_amendment,
} => Self::AcceptWithExecpolicyAmendment {
execpolicy_amendment: proposed_execpolicy_amendment.into(),
},
CoreReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => Self::AcceptForSession,
CoreReviewDecision::NetworkPolicyAmendment {
network_policy_amendment,
} => Self::ApplyNetworkPolicyAmendment {
network_policy_amendment: network_policy_amendment.into(),
},
CoreReviewDecision::Abort => Self::Cancel,
CoreReviewDecision::Denied => Self::Decline,
}
}
}
```
And updates `CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams` to have a new field:
```rust
available_decisions: Option<Vec<CommandExecutionApprovalDecision>>
```
when, if specified, should make it easier for clients to display an
appropriate list of options in the UI.
This makes it possible for `CoreShellActionProvider::prompt()` in
`unix_escalation.rs` to specify the `Vec<ReviewDecision>` directly,
adding support for `ApprovedForSession` when approving a skill script,
which was previously missing in the TUI.
Note this results in a significant change to `exec_options()` in
`approval_overlay.rs`, as the displayed options are now derived from
`available_decisions: &[ReviewDecision]`.
## What Changed
- Add `available_decisions` to
[`ExecApprovalRequestEvent`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/de00e932dd9801de0a4faac0519162099753f331/codex-rs/protocol/src/approvals.rs#L111-L175),
including helpers to derive the legacy default choices when older
senders omit the field.
- Map `codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision` to app-server
`CommandExecutionApprovalDecision` and expose the ordered list as
experimental `availableDecisions` in
[`CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/de00e932dd9801de0a4faac0519162099753f331/codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2.rs#L3798-L3807).
- Thread optional `available_decisions` through the core approval path
so Unix shell escalation can explicitly request `ApprovedForSession` for
session-scoped approvals instead of relying on client heuristics.
[`unix_escalation.rs`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/de00e932dd9801de0a4faac0519162099753f331/codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs#L194-L214)
- Update the TUI approval overlay to build its buttons from the ordered
decision list, while preserving the legacy fallback when
`available_decisions` is missing.
- Update the app-server README, test client output, and generated schema
artifacts to document and surface the new field.
## Testing
- Add `approval_overlay.rs` coverage for explicit decision lists,
including the generic `ApprovedForSession` path and network approval
options.
- Update `chatwidget/tests.rs` and app-server protocol tests to populate
the new optional field and keep older event shapes working.
## Developers Docs
- If we document `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` on
[developers.openai.com/codex](https://developers.openai.com/codex), add
experimental `availableDecisions` as the preferred source of approval
choices and note that older servers may omit it.
213 lines
7.9 KiB
Rust
213 lines
7.9 KiB
Rust
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
|
use std::path::PathBuf;
|
|
|
|
use crate::mcp::RequestId;
|
|
use crate::models::PermissionProfile;
|
|
use crate::parse_command::ParsedCommand;
|
|
use crate::protocol::FileChange;
|
|
use crate::protocol::ReviewDecision;
|
|
use schemars::JsonSchema;
|
|
use serde::Deserialize;
|
|
use serde::Serialize;
|
|
use ts_rs::TS;
|
|
|
|
/// Proposed execpolicy change to allow commands starting with this prefix.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The `command` tokens form the prefix that would be added as an execpolicy
|
|
/// `prefix_rule(..., decision="allow")`, letting the agent bypass approval for
|
|
/// commands that start with this token sequence.
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
#[serde(transparent)]
|
|
#[ts(type = "Array<string>")]
|
|
pub struct ExecPolicyAmendment {
|
|
pub command: Vec<String>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl ExecPolicyAmendment {
|
|
pub fn new(command: Vec<String>) -> Self {
|
|
Self { command }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn command(&self) -> &[String] {
|
|
&self.command
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl From<Vec<String>> for ExecPolicyAmendment {
|
|
fn from(command: Vec<String>) -> Self {
|
|
Self { command }
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
|
|
pub enum NetworkApprovalProtocol {
|
|
// TODO(viyatb): Add websocket protocol variants when managed proxy policy
|
|
// decisions expose websocket traffic as a distinct approval context.
|
|
Http,
|
|
#[serde(alias = "https_connect", alias = "http-connect")]
|
|
Https,
|
|
Socks5Tcp,
|
|
Socks5Udp,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
pub struct NetworkApprovalContext {
|
|
pub host: String,
|
|
pub protocol: NetworkApprovalProtocol,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
|
|
pub enum NetworkPolicyRuleAction {
|
|
Allow,
|
|
Deny,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
pub struct NetworkPolicyAmendment {
|
|
pub host: String,
|
|
pub action: NetworkPolicyRuleAction,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
pub struct ExecApprovalRequestEvent {
|
|
/// Identifier for the associated command execution item.
|
|
pub call_id: String,
|
|
/// Identifier for this specific approval callback.
|
|
///
|
|
/// When absent, the approval is for the command item itself (`call_id`).
|
|
/// This is present for subcommand approvals (via execve intercept).
|
|
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
#[ts(optional)]
|
|
pub approval_id: Option<String>,
|
|
/// Turn ID that this command belongs to.
|
|
/// Uses `#[serde(default)]` for backwards compatibility.
|
|
#[serde(default)]
|
|
pub turn_id: String,
|
|
/// The command to be executed.
|
|
pub command: Vec<String>,
|
|
/// The command's working directory.
|
|
pub cwd: PathBuf,
|
|
/// Optional human-readable reason for the approval (e.g. retry without sandbox).
|
|
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
pub reason: Option<String>,
|
|
/// Optional network context for a blocked request that can be approved.
|
|
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
#[ts(optional)]
|
|
pub network_approval_context: Option<NetworkApprovalContext>,
|
|
/// Proposed execpolicy amendment that can be applied to allow future runs.
|
|
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
#[ts(optional)]
|
|
pub proposed_execpolicy_amendment: Option<ExecPolicyAmendment>,
|
|
/// Proposed network policy amendments (for example allow/deny this host in future).
|
|
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
#[ts(optional)]
|
|
pub proposed_network_policy_amendments: Option<Vec<NetworkPolicyAmendment>>,
|
|
/// Optional additional filesystem permissions requested for this command.
|
|
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
#[ts(optional)]
|
|
pub additional_permissions: Option<PermissionProfile>,
|
|
/// Ordered list of decisions the client may present for this prompt.
|
|
///
|
|
/// When absent, clients should derive the legacy default set from the
|
|
/// other fields on this request.
|
|
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
#[ts(optional)]
|
|
pub available_decisions: Option<Vec<ReviewDecision>>,
|
|
pub parsed_cmd: Vec<ParsedCommand>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl ExecApprovalRequestEvent {
|
|
pub fn effective_approval_id(&self) -> String {
|
|
self.approval_id
|
|
.clone()
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|| self.call_id.clone())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn effective_available_decisions(&self) -> Vec<ReviewDecision> {
|
|
// available_decisions is a new field that may not be populated by older
|
|
// senders, so we fall back to the legacy logic if it's not present.
|
|
match &self.available_decisions {
|
|
Some(decisions) => decisions.clone(),
|
|
None => Self::default_available_decisions(
|
|
self.network_approval_context.as_ref(),
|
|
self.proposed_execpolicy_amendment.as_ref(),
|
|
self.proposed_network_policy_amendments.as_deref(),
|
|
self.additional_permissions.as_ref(),
|
|
),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn default_available_decisions(
|
|
network_approval_context: Option<&NetworkApprovalContext>,
|
|
proposed_execpolicy_amendment: Option<&ExecPolicyAmendment>,
|
|
proposed_network_policy_amendments: Option<&[NetworkPolicyAmendment]>,
|
|
additional_permissions: Option<&PermissionProfile>,
|
|
) -> Vec<ReviewDecision> {
|
|
if network_approval_context.is_some() {
|
|
let mut decisions = vec![ReviewDecision::Approved, ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession];
|
|
if let Some(amendment) = proposed_network_policy_amendments.and_then(|amendments| {
|
|
amendments
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.find(|amendment| amendment.action == NetworkPolicyRuleAction::Allow)
|
|
}) {
|
|
decisions.push(ReviewDecision::NetworkPolicyAmendment {
|
|
network_policy_amendment: amendment.clone(),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
decisions.push(ReviewDecision::Abort);
|
|
return decisions;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if additional_permissions.is_some() {
|
|
return vec![ReviewDecision::Approved, ReviewDecision::Abort];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let mut decisions = vec![ReviewDecision::Approved];
|
|
if let Some(prefix) = proposed_execpolicy_amendment {
|
|
decisions.push(ReviewDecision::ApprovedExecpolicyAmendment {
|
|
proposed_execpolicy_amendment: prefix.clone(),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
decisions.push(ReviewDecision::Abort);
|
|
decisions
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
pub struct ElicitationRequestEvent {
|
|
pub server_name: String,
|
|
#[ts(type = "string | number")]
|
|
pub id: RequestId,
|
|
pub message: String,
|
|
// TODO: MCP servers can request we fill out a schema for the elicitation. We don't support
|
|
// this yet.
|
|
// pub requested_schema: ElicitRequestParamsRequestedSchema,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
#[serde(rename_all = "lowercase")]
|
|
pub enum ElicitationAction {
|
|
Accept,
|
|
Decline,
|
|
Cancel,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, JsonSchema, TS)]
|
|
pub struct ApplyPatchApprovalRequestEvent {
|
|
/// Responses API call id for the associated patch apply call, if available.
|
|
pub call_id: String,
|
|
/// Turn ID that this patch belongs to.
|
|
/// Uses `#[serde(default)]` for backwards compatibility with older senders.
|
|
#[serde(default)]
|
|
pub turn_id: String,
|
|
pub changes: HashMap<PathBuf, FileChange>,
|
|
/// Optional explanatory reason (e.g. request for extra write access).
|
|
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
pub reason: Option<String>,
|
|
/// When set, the agent is asking the user to allow writes under this root for the remainder of the session.
|
|
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
|
|
pub grant_root: Option<PathBuf>,
|
|
}
|