## Summary
Enterprise users can have an effective monthly credit limit, but Codex
`/status` currently drops that metadata from the account-usage response.
This change adds the optional `spend_control.individual_limit`
projection to the existing rate-limit snapshot flow. The backend client
reads the monthly limit, app-server exposes it as `individualLimit`, and
the TUI renders a `Monthly credit limit` row through the existing
progress-bar renderer.
When the backend does not return an effective monthly limit, existing
rate-limit behavior is unchanged.
## Existing backend state
The account-usage backend already returns the effective monthly limit
and current usage together:
```json
{
"spend_control": {
"reached": false,
"individual_limit": {
"limit": "25000",
"used": "8000",
"remaining": "17000",
"used_percent": 32,
"remaining_percent": 68,
"reset_after_seconds": 86400,
"reset_at": 1778137680
}
}
}
```
Before this change, Codex projected rolling `primary` and `secondary`
windows plus `credits`. It ignored `spend_control.individual_limit`, so
app-server clients and `/status` could not render the monthly cap.
The updated flow is:
```text
account usage backend
-> backend-client reads spend_control.individual_limit
-> existing rate-limit snapshot carries optional individual_limit
-> app-server exposes optional individualLimit
-> TUI renders Monthly credit limit
```
## App-server contract
`account/rateLimits/read` and sparse `account/rateLimits/updated`
notifications now include an additive nullable
`rateLimits.individualLimit` field:
```json
{
"individualLimit": {
"limit": "25000",
"used": "8000",
"remainingPercent": 68,
"resetsAt": 1778137680
}
}
```
In an `account/rateLimits/read` response, `null` means no monthly limit
is available. `account/rateLimits/updated` remains a sparse rolling
notification: clients merge available values into their most recent
`account/rateLimits/read` snapshot or refetch. Nullable account metadata
in a rolling notification does not clear a previously observed value.
## Design decisions
- Extend the existing rate-limit snapshot instead of introducing a
separate request or wire-level update protocol.
- Keep the Codex projection narrow: `/status` needs the effective limit,
current usage, remaining percentage, and reset timestamp.
- Render the monthly row through the existing progress-bar renderer,
with one optional detail line for `8,000 of 25,000 credits used`.
- Keep the backend response optional so existing accounts and older
usage states preserve their current behavior.
- Preserve cached monthly metadata when sparse rolling notifications
omit it. Live account-usage reads remain authoritative and can clear a
removed limit.
## Visual evidence
```text
Monthly credit limit: [██████████████░░░░░░] 68% left (resets 07:08 on 7 May)
8,000 of 25,000 credits used
```
Snapshot:
`codex-rs/tui/src/status/snapshots/codex_tui__status__tests__status_snapshot_includes_enterprise_monthly_credit_limit.snap`
## Testing
Tests: generated app-server schema verification, protocol tests,
backend-client tests, app-server integration coverage, TUI snapshot
coverage, formatting, and workspace lint cleanup.
Memories
This directory owns reusable memory crates and the memory pipeline documentation.
Runtime orchestration for Phase 1 and Phase 2 still lives in codex-core under
codex-rs/core/src/memories/.
Crates
codex-rs/memories/read(codex-memories-read) owns the read path: memory developer-instruction injection, memory citation parsing, and read-usage telemetry classification.codex-rs/memories/write(codex-memories-write) owns the write path: Phase 1 and Phase 2 prompt rendering, filesystem artifact helpers, workspace diff helpers, and extension resource pruning.
Prompt Templates
Memory prompt templates live with the crate that uses them:
- The undated template files are the canonical latest versions used at runtime:
read/templates/memories/read_path.mdwrite/templates/memories/stage_one_system.mdwrite/templates/memories/stage_one_input.mdwrite/templates/memories/consolidation.md
- In
codex, edit those undated template files in place. - The dated snapshot-copy workflow is used in the separate
openai/project/agent_memory/writeharness repo, not here.
When it runs
The pipeline is triggered when a root session starts, and only if:
- the session is not ephemeral
- the memory feature is enabled
- the session is not a sub-agent session
- the state DB is available
It runs asynchronously in the background and executes two phases in order: Phase 1, then Phase 2.
Phase 1: Rollout Extraction (per-thread)
Phase 1 finds recent eligible rollouts and extracts a structured memory from each one.
Eligible rollouts are selected from the state DB using startup claim rules. In practice this means the pipeline only considers rollouts that are:
- from allowed interactive session sources
- within the configured age window
- idle long enough (to avoid summarizing still-active/fresh rollouts)
- not already owned by another in-flight phase-1 worker
- within startup scan/claim limits (bounded work per startup)
What it does:
- claims a bounded set of rollout jobs from the state DB (startup claim)
- filters rollout content down to memory-relevant response items
- sends each rollout to a model (in parallel, with a concurrency cap)
- expects structured output containing:
- a detailed
raw_memory - a compact
rollout_summary - an optional
rollout_slug
- a detailed
- redacts secrets from the generated memory fields
- stores successful outputs back into the state DB as stage-1 outputs
Concurrency / coordination:
- Phase 1 runs multiple extraction jobs in parallel (with a fixed concurrency cap) so startup memory generation can process several rollouts at once.
- Each job is leased/claimed in the state DB before processing, which prevents duplicate work across concurrent workers/startups.
- Failed jobs are marked with retry backoff, so they are retried later instead of hot-looping.
Job outcomes:
succeeded(memory produced)succeeded_no_output(valid run but nothing useful generated)failed(with retry backoff/lease handling in DB)
Phase 1 is the stage that turns individual rollouts into DB-backed memory records.
Phase 2: Global Consolidation
Phase 2 consolidates the latest stage-1 outputs into the filesystem memory artifacts and then runs a dedicated consolidation agent.
What it does:
- claims a single global phase-2 lock before touching the memories root (so only one consolidation inspects or mutates the workspace at a time)
- loads a bounded set of stage-1 outputs from the state DB using phase-2
selection rules:
- ignores memories whose
last_usagefalls outside the configuredmax_unused_dayswindow - for memories with no
last_usage, falls back togenerated_atso fresh never-used memories can still be selected - ranks eligible memories by
usage_countfirst, then by the most recentlast_usage/generated_at
- ignores memories whose
- computes a completion watermark from the claimed watermark + newest input timestamps
- syncs local memory artifacts under the memories root:
raw_memories.md(merged raw memories, stable ascending thread-id order)rollout_summaries/(one summary file per selected rollout)
- keeps the memories root itself as a git-baseline directory, initialized under
~/.codex/memories/.gitbycodex-git-utils - prunes stale rollout summaries that are no longer selected
- prunes memory extension resource files older than the extension retention window, so cleanup appears in the workspace diff
- writes
phase2_workspace_diff.mdin the memories root with the git-style diff from the previous successful Phase 2 baseline to the current worktree - if the memory workspace has no changes after artifact sync/pruning, marks the job successful and exits
If the memory workspace has changes, it then:
- spawns an internal consolidation sub-agent
- builds the Phase 2 prompt with the path to the generated workspace diff
- points the agent at
phase2_workspace_diff.mdfor the detailed diff context - runs it with no approvals, no network, and local write access only
- disables collab for that agent (to prevent recursive delegation)
- watches the agent status and heartbeats the global job lease while it runs
- resets the memory git baseline after the agent completes successfully; the generated diff file is removed before this reset so deleted content is not kept in the prompt artifact or unreachable git objects
- marks the phase-2 job success/failure in the state DB when the agent finishes
Selection and workspace-diff behavior:
- successful Phase 2 runs mark the exact stage-1 snapshots they consumed with
selected_for_phase2 = 1and persist the matchingselected_for_phase2_source_updated_at - Phase 1 upserts preserve the previous
selected_for_phase2baseline until the next successful Phase 2 run rewrites it - Phase 2 loads only the current top-N selected stage-1 inputs, syncs
rollout_summaries/directly to that selection, rendersraw_memories.mdin stable ascending thread-id order to avoid usage-rank churn, then lets the git-style workspace diff surface additions, modifications, and deletions against the previous successful memory baseline - when the selected input set is empty, stale
rollout_summaries/files are removed andraw_memories.mdis rewritten to the empty-input placeholder; consolidated outputs such asMEMORY.md,memory_summary.md, andskills/are left for the agent to update
Watermark behavior:
- The global phase-2 lock does not use DB watermarks as a dirty check; git workspace dirtiness decides whether an agent needs to run.
- The global phase-2 job row still tracks an input watermark as bookkeeping for the latest DB input timestamp known when the job was claimed.
- Phase 2 recomputes a
new_watermarkusing the max of:- the claimed watermark
- the newest
source_updated_attimestamp in the stage-1 inputs it actually loaded
- On success, Phase 2 stores that completion watermark in the DB.
- This avoids moving the recorded completion watermark backwards, but does not decide whether Phase 2 has work.
In practice, this phase is responsible for refreshing the on-disk memory workspace and producing/updating the higher-level consolidated memory outputs.
Why it is split into two phases
- Phase 1 scales across many rollouts and produces normalized per-rollout memory records.
- Phase 2 serializes global consolidation so the shared memory artifacts are updated safely and consistently.