Currently, our `npm publish` logic is failing.
There were a number of things that were merged recently that seemed to
contribute to this situation, though I think we have fixed most of them,
but this one stands out:
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/10115
As best I can tell, we tried to fix the pnpm version to a specific hash,
but we did not do it consistently (though `shell-tool-mcp/package.json`
had it specified twice...), so for this PR, I ran:
```
$ git ls-files | grep package.json
codex-cli/package.json
codex-rs/responses-api-proxy/npm/package.json
package.json
sdk/typescript/package.json
shell-tool-mcp/package.json
```
and ensured that all of them now have this line:
```json
"packageManager": "pnpm@10.28.2+sha512.41872f037ad22f7348e3b1debbaf7e867cfd448f2726d9cf74c08f19507c31d2c8e7a11525b983febc2df640b5438dee6023ebb1f84ed43cc2d654d2bc326264"
```
I also went and deleted all of the `corepack` stuff that was added by
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/10115.
If someone can explain why we need it and verify it does not break `npm
publish`, then we can bring it back.
This PR configures Codex CLI so it can be built with
[Bazel](https://bazel.build) in addition to Cargo. The `.bazelrc`
includes configuration so that remote builds can be done using
[BuildBuddy](https://www.buildbuddy.io).
If you are familiar with Bazel, things should work as you expect, e.g.,
run `bazel test //... --keep-going` to run all the tests in the repo,
but we have also added some new aliases in the `justfile` for
convenience:
- `just bazel-test` to run tests locally
- `just bazel-remote-test` to run tests remotely (currently, the remote
build is for x86_64 Linux regardless of your host platform). Note we are
currently seeing the following test failures in the remote build, so we
still need to figure out what is happening here:
```
failures:
suite::compact::manual_compact_twice_preserves_latest_user_messages
suite::compact_resume_fork::compact_resume_after_second_compaction_preserves_history
suite::compact_resume_fork::compact_resume_and_fork_preserve_model_history_view
```
- `just build-for-release` to build release binaries for all
platforms/architectures remotely
To setup remote execution:
- [Create a buildbuddy account](https://app.buildbuddy.io/) (OpenAI
employees should also request org access at
https://openai.buildbuddy.io/join/ with their `@openai.com` email
address.)
- [Copy your API key](https://app.buildbuddy.io/docs/setup/) to
`~/.bazelrc` (add the line `build
--remote_header=x-buildbuddy-api-key=YOUR_KEY`)
- Use `--config=remote` in your `bazel` invocations (or add `common
--config=remote` to your `~/.bazelrc`, or use the `just` commands)
## CI
In terms of CI, this PR introduces `.github/workflows/bazel.yml`, which
uses Bazel to run the tests _locally_ on Mac and Linux GitHub runners
(we are working on supporting Windows, but that is not ready yet). Note
that the failures we are seeing in `just bazel-remote-test` do not occur
on these GitHub CI jobs, so everything in `.github/workflows/bazel.yml`
is green right now.
The `bazel.yml` uses extra config in `.github/workflows/ci.bazelrc` so
that macOS CI jobs build _remotely_ on Linux hosts (using the
`docker://docker.io/mbolin491/codex-bazel` Docker image declared in the
root `BUILD.bazel`) using cross-compilation to build the macOS
artifacts. Then these artifacts are downloaded locally to GitHub's macOS
runner so the tests can be executed natively. This is the relevant
config that enables this:
```
common:macos --config=remote
common:macos --strategy=remote
common:macos --strategy=TestRunner=darwin-sandbox,local
```
Because of the remote caching benefits we get from BuildBuddy, these new
CI jobs can be extremely fast! For example, consider these two jobs that
ran all the tests on Linux x86_64:
- Bazel 1m37s
https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/20861063212/job/59940545209?pr=8875
- Cargo 9m20s
https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/20861063192/job/59940559592?pr=8875
For now, we will continue to run both the Bazel and Cargo jobs for PRs,
but once we add support for Windows and running Clippy, we should be
able to cutover to using Bazel exclusively for PRs, which should still
speed things up considerably. We will probably continue to run the Cargo
jobs post-merge for commits that land on `main` as a sanity check.
Release builds will also continue to be done by Cargo for now.
Earlier attempt at this PR: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8832
Earlier attempt to add support for Buck2, now abandoned:
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8504
---------
Co-authored-by: David Zbarsky <dzbarsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
`codex-responses-api-proxy` is designed so that there should be exactly
one copy of the API key in memory (that is `mlock`'d on UNIX), but in
practice, I was seeing two when I dumped the process data from
`/proc/$PID/mem`.
It appears that `std::io::stdin()` maintains an internal `BufReader`
that we cannot zero out, so this PR changes the implementation on UNIX
so that we use a low-level `read(2)` instead.
Even though it seems like it would be incredibly unlikely, we also make
this logic tolerant of short reads. Either `\n` or `EOF` must be sent to
signal the end of the key written to stdin.
This PR expands `.github/workflows/rust-release.yml` so that it also
builds and publishes the `npm` module for
`@openai/codex-responses-api-proxy` in addition to `@openai/codex`. Note
both `npm` modules are similar, in that they each contain a single `.js`
file that is a thin launcher around the appropriate native executable.
(Since we have a minimal dependency on Node.js, I also lowered the
minimum version from 20 to 16 and verified that works on my machine.)
As part of this change, we tighten up some of the docs around
`codex-responses-api-proxy` and ensure the details regarding protecting
the `OPENAI_API_KEY` in memory match the implementation.
To test the `npm` build process, I ran:
```
./codex-cli/scripts/build_npm_package.py --package codex-responses-api-proxy --version 0.43.0-alpha.3
```
which stages the `npm` module for `@openai/codex-responses-api-proxy` in
a temp directory, using the binary artifacts from
https://github.com/openai/codex/releases/tag/rust-v0.43.0-alpha.3.
This removes the `codex responses-api-proxy` subcommand in favor of
running it as a standalone CLI.
As part of this change, we:
- remove the dependency on `tokio`/`async/await` as well as `codex_arg0`
- introduce the use of `pre_main_hardening()` so `CODEX_SECURE_MODE=1`
is not required
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/4404).
* #4406
* __->__ #4404
* #4403
This is likely the reason that I saw some conversations "freeze up" when
using the proxy.
Note the client in `core` does not specify a timeout when making
requests to the Responses API, so the proxy should not, either.
Details are in `responses-api-proxy/README.md`, but the key contribution
of this PR is a new subcommand, `codex responses-api-proxy`, which reads
the auth token for use with the OpenAI Responses API from `stdin` at
startup and then proxies `POST` requests to `/v1/responses` over to
`https://api.openai.com/v1/responses`, injecting the auth token as part
of the `Authorization` header.
The expectation is that `codex responses-api-proxy` is launched by a
privileged user who has access to the auth token so that it can be used
by unprivileged users of the Codex CLI on the same host.
If the client only has one user account with `sudo`, one option is to:
- run `sudo codex responses-api-proxy --http-shutdown --server-info
/tmp/server-info.json` to start the server
- record the port written to `/tmp/server-info.json`
- relinquish their `sudo` privileges (which is irreversible!) like so:
```
sudo deluser $USER sudo || sudo gpasswd -d $USER sudo || true
```
- use `codex` with the proxy (see `README.md`)
- when done, make a `GET` request to the server using the `PORT` from
`server-info.json` to shut it down:
```shell
curl --fail --silent --show-error "http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/shutdown"
```
To protect the auth token, we:
- allocate a 1024 byte buffer on the stack and write `"Bearer "` into it
to start
- we then read from `stdin`, copying to the contents into the buffer
after the prefix
- after verifying the input looks good, we create a `String` from that
buffer (so the data is now on the heap)
- we zero out the stack-allocated buffer using
https://crates.io/crates/zeroize so it is not optimized away by the
compiler
- we invoke `.leak()` on the `String` so we can treat its contents as a
`&'static str`, as it will live for the rest of the processs
- on UNIX, we `mlock(2)` the memory backing the `&'static str`
- when using the `&'static str` when building an HTTP request, we use
`HeaderValue::from_static()` to avoid copying the `&str`
- we also invoke `.set_sensitive(true)` on the `HeaderValue`, which in
theory indicates to other parts of the HTTP stack that the header should
be treated with "special care" to avoid leakage:
https://github.com/hyperium/http/blob/439d1c50d71e3be3204b6c4a1bf2255ed78e1f93/src/header/value.rs#L346-L376
Michael Bolin ·
Ahmed Ibrahim ·
jif-oai ·
pakrym-oai ·
Anton Panasenko ·
zbarsky-openai ·
Josh McKinney ·
Thibault Sottiaux ·