Commit Graph

8 Commits

  • [codex-analytics] plumb protocol-native review timing (#21434)
    ## Why
    
    We want terminal tool review analytics, but the reducer should not stamp
    review timing from its own wall clock.
    
    This PR plumbs review timing through the real protocol and app-server
    seams so downstream analytics can consume the emitter's timestamps
    directly. Guardian reviews keep their enriched `started_at` /
    `completed_at` analytics fields by deriving those legacy second-based
    values from the same protocol-native millisecond lifecycle timestamps,
    rather than sampling a separate analytics clock.
    
    ## What changed
    
    - add `started_at_ms` to user approval request payloads
    - add `started_at_ms` / `completed_at_ms` to guardian review
    notifications
    - preserve Guardian review `started_at` / `completed_at` enrichment from
    the protocol-native timing source
    - stamp typed `ServerResponse` analytics facts with app-server-observed
    `completed_at_ms`
    - thread the new timing fields through core, protocol, app-server, TUI,
    and analytics fixtures
    
    ## Verification
    
    - `cargo test -p codex-app-server outgoing_message --manifest-path
    codex-rs/Cargo.toml`
    - `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol guardian --manifest-path
    codex-rs/Cargo.toml`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui guardian --manifest-path codex-rs/Cargo.toml`
    - `cargo test -p codex-analytics analytics_client_tests --manifest-path
    codex-rs/Cargo.toml`
    
    ---
    [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
    Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
    with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/21434).
    * #18748
    * __->__ #21434
    * #18747
    * #17090
    * #17089
    * #20514
  • permissions: make profiles represent enforcement (#19231)
    ## Why
    
    `PermissionProfile` is becoming the canonical permissions abstraction,
    but the old shape only carried optional filesystem and network fields.
    It could describe allowed access, but not who is responsible for
    enforcing it. That made `DangerFullAccess` and `ExternalSandbox` lossy
    when profiles were exported, cached, or round-tripped through app-server
    APIs.
    
    The important model change is that active permissions are now a disjoint
    union over the enforcement mode. Conceptually:
    
    ```rust
    pub enum PermissionProfile {
        Managed {
            file_system: FileSystemSandboxPolicy,
            network: NetworkSandboxPolicy,
        },
        Disabled,
        External {
            network: NetworkSandboxPolicy,
        },
    }
    ```
    
    This distinction matters because `Disabled` means Codex should apply no
    outer sandbox at all, while `External` means filesystem isolation is
    owned by an outside caller. Those are not equivalent to a broad managed
    sandbox. For example, macOS cannot nest Seatbelt inside Seatbelt, so an
    inner sandbox may require the outer Codex layer to use no sandbox rather
    than a permissive one.
    
    ## How Existing Modeling Maps
    
    Legacy `SandboxPolicy` remains a boundary projection, but it now maps
    into the higher-fidelity profile model:
    
    - `ReadOnly` and `WorkspaceWrite` map to `PermissionProfile::Managed`
    with restricted filesystem entries plus the corresponding network
    policy.
    - `DangerFullAccess` maps to `PermissionProfile::Disabled`, preserving
    the “no outer sandbox” intent instead of treating it as a lax managed
    sandbox.
    - `ExternalSandbox { network_access }` maps to
    `PermissionProfile::External { network }`, preserving external
    filesystem enforcement while still carrying the active network policy.
    - Split runtime policies that legacy `SandboxPolicy` cannot faithfully
    express, such as managed unrestricted filesystem plus restricted
    network, stay `Managed` instead of being collapsed into
    `ExternalSandbox`.
    - Per-command/session/turn grants remain partial overlays via
    `AdditionalPermissionProfile`; full `PermissionProfile` is reserved for
    complete active runtime permissions.
    
    ## What Changed
    
    - Change active `PermissionProfile` into a tagged union: `managed`,
    `disabled`, and `external`.
    - Keep partial permission grants separate with
    `AdditionalPermissionProfile` for command/session/turn overlays.
    - Represent managed filesystem permissions as either `restricted`
    entries or `unrestricted`; `glob_scan_max_depth` is non-zero when
    present.
    - Preserve old rollout compatibility by accepting the pre-tagged `{
    network, file_system }` profile shape during deserialization.
    - Preserve fidelity for important edge cases: `DangerFullAccess`
    round-trips as `disabled`, `ExternalSandbox` round-trips as `external`,
    and managed unrestricted filesystem + restricted network stays managed
    instead of being mistaken for external enforcement.
    - Preserve configured deny-read entries and bounded glob scan depth when
    full profiles are projected back into runtime policies, including
    unrestricted replacements that now become `:root = write` plus deny
    entries.
    - Regenerate the experimental app-server v2 JSON/TypeScript schema and
    update the `command/exec` README example for the tagged
    `permissionProfile` shape.
    
    ## Compatibility
    
    Legacy `SandboxPolicy` remains available at config/API boundaries as the
    compatibility projection. Existing rollout lines with the old
    `PermissionProfile` shape continue to load. The app-server
    `permissionProfile` field is experimental, so its v2 wire shape is
    intentionally updated to match the higher-fidelity model.
    
    ## Verification
    
    - `just write-app-server-schema`
    - `cargo check --tests`
    - `cargo test -p codex-protocol permission_profile`
    - `cargo test -p codex-protocol
    preserving_deny_entries_keeps_unrestricted_policy_enforceable`
    - `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol
    permission_profile_file_system_permissions`
    - `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol serialize_client_response`
    - `cargo test -p codex-core
    session_configured_reports_permission_profile_for_external_sandbox`
    - `just fix`
    - `just fix -p codex-protocol`
    - `just fix -p codex-app-server-protocol`
    - `just fix -p codex-core`
    - `just fix -p codex-app-server`
  • feat(request-permissions) approve with strict review (#19050)
    ## Summary
    Allow the user to approve a request_permissions_tool request with the
    condition that all commands in the rest of the turn are reviewed by
    guardian, regardless of sandbox status.
    
    ## Testing
    - [x] Added unit tests
    - [x] Ran locally
  • sandboxing: intersect permission profiles semantically (#18275)
    ## Why
    
    Permission approval responses must not be able to grant more access than
    the tool requested. Moving this flow to `PermissionProfile` means the
    comparison must be profile-shaped instead of `SandboxPolicy`-shaped, and
    cwd-relative special paths such as `:cwd` and `:project_roots` must stay
    anchored to the turn that produced the request.
    
    ## What changed
    
    This implements semantic `PermissionProfile` intersection in
    `codex-sandboxing` for file-system and network permissions. The
    intersection accepts narrower path grants, rejects broader grants,
    preserves deny-read carve-outs and glob scan depth, and materializes
    cwd-dependent special-path grants to absolute paths before they can be
    recorded for reuse.
    
    The request-permissions response paths now use that intersection
    consistently. App-server captures the request turn cwd before waiting
    for the client response, includes that cwd in the v2 approval params,
    and core stores the requested profile plus cwd for direct TUI/client
    responses and Guardian decisions before recording turn- or
    session-scoped grants. The TUI app-server bridge now preserves the
    app-server request cwd when converting permission approval params into
    core events.
    
    ## Verification
    
    - `cargo test -p codex-sandboxing intersect_permission_profiles --
    --nocapture`
    - `cargo test -p codex-app-server request_permissions_response --
    --nocapture`
    - `cargo test -p codex-core
    request_permissions_response_materializes_session_cwd_grants_before_recording
    -- --nocapture`
    - `cargo check -p codex-tui --tests`
    - `cargo check --tests`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui
    app_server_request_permissions_preserves_file_system_permissions`
  • permissions: remove macOS seatbelt extension profiles (#15918)
    ## Why
    
    `PermissionProfile` should only describe the per-command permissions we
    still want to grant dynamically. Keeping
    `MacOsSeatbeltProfileExtensions` in that surface forced extra macOS-only
    approval, protocol, schema, and TUI branches for a capability we no
    longer want to expose.
    
    ## What changed
    
    - Removed the macOS-specific permission-profile types from
    `codex-protocol`, the app-server v2 API, and the generated
    schema/TypeScript artifacts.
    - Deleted the core and sandboxing plumbing that threaded
    `MacOsSeatbeltProfileExtensions` through execution requests and seatbelt
    construction.
    - Simplified macOS seatbelt generation so it always includes the fixed
    read-only preferences allowlist instead of carrying a configurable
    profile extension.
    - Removed the macOS additional-permissions UI/docs/test coverage and
    deleted the obsolete macOS permission modules.
    - Tightened `request_permissions` intersection handling so explicitly
    empty requested read lists are preserved only when that field was
    actually granted, avoiding zero-grant responses being stored as active
    permissions.
  • feat(core) Persist request_permission data across turns (#14009)
    ## Summary
    request_permissions flows should support persisting results for the
    session.
    
    Open Question: Still deciding if we need within-turn approvals - this
    adds complexity but I could see it being useful
    
    ## Testing
    - [x] Updated unit tests
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
  • Add request permissions tool (#13092)
    Adds a built-in `request_permissions` tool and wires it through the
    Codex core, protocol, and app-server layers so a running turn can ask
    the client for additional permissions instead of relying on a static
    session policy.
    
    The new flow emits a `RequestPermissions` event from core, tracks the
    pending request by call ID, forwards it through app-server v2 as an
    `item/permissions/requestApproval` request, and resumes the tool call
    once the client returns an approved subset of the requested permission
    profile.