## Why
Rollout traces need an identifier that can be used to correlate a Codex
inference with upstream Responses API, proxy, and engine logs. The
reduced trace model already exposed `upstream_request_id`, but it was
being populated from the Responses API `response.id`. That value is
useful for `previous_response_id` chaining, but it is not the transport
request id that upstream systems key on.
This PR separates those concepts so trace consumers can reliably answer
both questions:
- which Responses API response did this inference produce?
- which upstream request handled it?
## Structure
The change keeps the upstream request id at the same lifecycle level as
the provider stream:
- `codex-api` captures the `x-request-id` HTTP response header when the
SSE stream is created and exposes it on `ResponseStream`. Fixture and
websocket streams set the field to `None` because they do not have that
HTTP response header.
- `codex-core` carries that stream-level id into `InferenceTraceAttempt`
when recording terminal stream outcomes. Completed, failed, cancelled,
dropped-stream, and pre-response error paths all record the id when it
is available.
- `rollout-trace` now records both identifiers in raw terminal inference
events and response payloads: `response_id` for the Responses API
`response.id`, and `upstream_request_id` for `x-request-id`.
- The reducer stores both fields on `InferenceCall`. It also uses
`response_id` for `previous_response_id` conversation linking, which
removes the old accidental dependency on the misnamed
`upstream_request_id` field.
- Terminal inference reduction now consumes the full terminal payload
(`InferenceCompleted`, `InferenceFailed`, or `InferenceCancelled`) in
one place. That keeps status, partial payloads, response ids, and
upstream request ids consistent across success, failure, cancellation,
and late stream-mapper events.
## Why This Shape
`x-request-id` is a property of the HTTP/provider response envelope, not
an SSE event. Capturing it once in `codex-api` and plumbing it through
terminal trace recording avoids trying to infer the value from stream
contents, and it preserves the id even when the stream fails or is
cancelled after only partial output.
Keeping `response_id` separate from `upstream_request_id` also makes the
reduced trace model less surprising: `response_id` remains the
conversation-continuation id, while `upstream_request_id` is the
operational correlation id for upstream debugging.
## Validation
The PR updates trace and reducer coverage for:
- reading `x-request-id` from SSE response headers;
- storing the true upstream request id on completed inference calls;
- preserving upstream request ids for cancelled and late-cancelled
inference streams;
- keeping `previous_response_id` reconstruction tied to `response_id`
rather than transport request ids.
Records cancelled inference streams when Codex stops consuming a
provider response before `response.completed`, preserving complete
output items observed before cancellation.
Also closes still-running inference calls when the owning turn ends, so
reduced rollout traces do not leave stale `Running` inference nodes.
Covered by focused reducer coverage and a core stream-drop test for
partial output preservation.
## Summary
Adds the debug CLI entry point for reducing recorded rollout traces.
This gives developers a direct way to inspect whether the emitted trace
stream reduces into the expected conversation/runtime model.
## Stack
This is PR 5/5 in the rollout trace stack.
- [#18876](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18876): Add rollout
trace crate
- [#18877](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18877): Record core
session rollout traces
- [#18878](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18878): Trace tool and
code-mode boundaries
- [#18879](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18879): Trace sessions
and multi-agent edges
- [#18880](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18880): Add debug trace
reduction command
## Review Notes
This PR is intentionally last: it depends on the trace crate, core
recorder, runtime/tool events, and session/agent edge data all existing.
The command should remain a debug/developer tool and avoid adding new
runtime behavior.
The useful review question is whether the CLI exposes the reducer in the
smallest practical way for local inspection without turning the debug
command into a supported user-facing workflow.
cassirer-openai ·