## Why
Codex assisted-code attribution needs a client-side accepted-code source
that does not upload raw code. This adds a hash-only analytics event
derived from the turn diff so downstream attribution can compare
accepted Codex lines against commit or PR diffs.
## What Changed
- Parse accepted/effective added lines from the final turn diff and emit
`codex_accepted_line_fingerprints` analytics.
- Hash repo, path, and normalized line content before upload; raw code
and raw diffs are not included in the event.
- Chunk large fingerprint payloads and send accepted-line fingerprint
events in isolated requests while preserving normal batching for other
analytics events.
- Canonicalize Git remote URLs before repo hashing so SSH/HTTPS GitHub
remotes join to the same repo hash.
- Add parser coverage for unified diff hunk lines that look like `+++`
or `---` file headers.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-analytics`
- `cargo test -p codex-git-utils canonicalize_git_remote_url`
- `just fix -p codex-analytics`
- `just bazel-lock-check`
- `git diff --check`
## Why
After the tool-item schemas are in place, analytics needs to emit them
from the app-server item lifecycle rather than requiring bespoke
tracking at each callsite. The reducer should also reuse the shared
thread analytics context introduced below it in the stack so later event
families do not repeat the same reducer joins or missing-state ladder.
## What changed
- Tracks tool-item completion notifications and emits the matching tool
analytics event when a terminal item arrives.
- Derives event-specific payload details for command execution, file
changes, MCP calls, dynamic tools, collaboration tools, web search, and
image generation.
- Denormalizes thread, app-server client, runtime, and subagent
provenance metadata through the shared thread analytics context.
- Adds reducer coverage for item lifecycle emission and subagent
metadata inheritance.
## Duration semantics
`duration_ms` is computed from the app-server item lifecycle timestamps:
`completed_at_ms - started_at_ms`. That makes it the duration of the
lifecycle Codex observed locally, not necessarily the upstream
provider's full execution time.
- Web search usually has a meaningful observed lifecycle because
Responses can send `response.output_item.added` before
`response.output_item.done`; in that case `started_at_ms` comes from the
added event and `completed_at_ms` comes from the done event.
- Image generation can be much less precise. In the current observed
stream, image generation often arrives only as a completed
`response.output_item.done`; when there is no earlier added event, Codex
synthesizes the started item immediately before completion, so
`duration_ms` can be `0` even though upstream image generation took
longer.
- Standalone web search and standalone image generation work is expected
to land after this stack. Those paths may introduce more direct
lifecycle events or timing points, so the current
web-search/image-generation duration semantics should be treated as the
best available item-lifecycle approximation, not the final latency
contract for those tool families.
- `execution_duration_ms` is populated only where the completed item
already carries a native execution duration; otherwise it remains `null`
while `duration_ms` still reflects the local lifecycle interval.
## Currently placeholder / partial fields
Some fields are included in the schema for the intended steady-state
contract, but this PR does not yet populate them from real
approval/review state:
- `review_count`, `guardian_review_count`, and `user_review_count`
currently default to `0`.
- `final_approval_outcome` currently defaults to `unknown`.
- `requested_additional_permissions` and `requested_network_access`
currently default to `false`.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-analytics`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/17090).
* #18748
* #18747
* __->__ #17090
* #17089
* #20514
## Why
Guardian approvals now run as review sessions, but Codex analytics did
not have a terminal event for those reviews. That made it hard to
measure approval outcomes, failure modes, Guardian session reuse, model
metadata, token usage, and timing separately from the parent turn.
## What changed
Adds `codex_guardian_review` analytics emission for Guardian approval
reviews. The event is emitted from the Guardian review path with review
identity, target item id, approval request source, a PII-minimized
reviewed-action shape, terminal decision/status, failure reason,
Guardian assessment fields, Guardian session metadata, token usage, and
timing metadata.
The reviewed-action payload intentionally omits high-risk fields such as
shell commands, working directories, argv, file paths, network
targets/hosts, rationale, retry reason, and permission justifications.
It also classifies prompt-build failures separately from Guardian
session/runtime failures so fail-closed cases are distinguishable in
analytics.
## Verification
- Guardian review analytics tests cover terminal success,
timeout/cancel/fail-closed paths, session metadata, and token usage
plumbing.
- `cargo clippy -p codex-core --lib --tests -- -D warnings`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/17693).
* #17696
* #17695
* __->__ #17693
## Why
Guardian review analytics needs a Rust event shape that matches the
backend schema while avoiding unnecessary PII exposure from reviewed
tool calls. This PR narrows the analytics payload to the fields we
intend to emit and keeps shared Guardian assessment enums in protocol
instead of duplicating equivalent analytics-only enums.
## What changed
- Uses protocol Guardian enums directly for `risk_level`,
`user_authorization`, `outcome`, and command source values.
- Removes high-risk reviewed-action fields from the analytics payload,
including raw commands, display strings, working directories, file
paths, network targets/hosts, justification text, retry reason, and
rationale text.
- Makes `target_item_id` and `tool_call_count` nullable so the Codex
event can represent cases where the app-server protocol or producer does
not have those values.
- Keeps lower-risk structured reviewed-action metadata such as sandbox
permissions, permission profile, `tty`, `execve` source/program, network
protocol/port, and MCP connector/tool labels.
- Adds an analytics reducer/client test covering `codex_guardian_review`
serialization with an optional `target_item_id` and absent removed
fields.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-analytics
guardian_review_event_ingests_custom_fact_with_optional_target_item`
- `cargo fmt --check`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/17692).
* #17696
* #17695
* #17693
* __->__ #17692
# Why
Add product analytics for hook handler executions so we can understand
which hooks are running, where they came from, and whether they
completed, failed, stopped, or blocked work.
# What
- add the new `codex_hook_run` analytics event and payload plumbing in
`codex-rs/analytics`
- emit hook-run analytics from the shared hook completion path in
`codex-rs/core`
- classify hook source from the loaded hook path as `system`, `user`,
`project`, or `unknown`
```
{
"event_type": "codex_hook_run",
"event_params": {
"thread_id": "string",
"turn_id": "string",
"model_slug": "string",
"hook_name": "string, // any HookEventName
"hook_source": "system | user | project | unknown",
"status": "completed | failed | stopped | blocked"
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Summary
- move the analytics events client into codex-analytics
- update codex-core and app-server callsites to use the new crate
## Testing
- CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
alexsong-oai ·
rhan-oai ·
Abhinav ·
Owen Lin ·
Ahmed Ibrahim ·