Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Shijie RaoandGitHub 370b13afc9 Honor client-resolved service tier defaults (#23537)
## Why

Model catalog responses can now advertise a nullable
`default_service_tier` for each model. Codex needs to preserve three
distinct states all the way from config/app-server inputs to inference:

- no explicit service tier, so the client may apply the current model
catalog default when FastMode is enabled
- explicit `default`, meaning the user intentionally wants standard
routing
- explicit catalog tier ids such as `priority`, `flex`, or future tiers

Keeping those states distinct prevents the UI from showing one tier
while core sends another, especially after model switches or app-server
`thread/start` / `turn/start` updates.

## What Changed

- Plumbed `default_service_tier` through model catalog protocol types,
app-server model responses, generated schemas, model cache fixtures, and
provider/model-manager conversions.
- Added the request-only `default` service tier sentinel and normalized
legacy config spelling so `fast` in `config.toml` still materializes as
the runtime/request id `priority`.
- Moved catalog default resolution to the TUI/client side, including
recomputing the effective service tier when model/FastMode-dependent
surfaces change.
- Updated app-server thread lifecycle config construction so
`serviceTier: null` preserves explicit standard-routing intent by
mapping to `default` instead of internal `None`.
- Kept core responsible for validating explicit tiers against the
current model and stripping `default` before `/v1/responses`, without
applying catalog defaults itself.

## Validation

- `CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo build -p codex-cli`
- `CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo test -p codex-app-server model_list`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui service_tier`
- `cargo test -p codex-protocol service_tier_for_request`
- `cargo test -p codex-core get_service_tier`
- `RUST_MIN_STACK=8388608 CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo test -p codex-core
service_tier`
2026-05-20 15:57:50 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub bbb5c2811d tui: pass active permission profiles through app commands (#22891)
## Why

This continues the permissions migration by keeping the TUI command
boundary aligned with the app-server protocol direction from #22795:
callers should select a permission profile by id instead of passing a
concrete `PermissionProfile` value around as the turn configuration.

`AppCommand` is internal to the TUI, but it is the path that eventually
becomes `thread/turn/start`, so carrying concrete profile details there
made it too easy for UI code to keep relying on the old whole-profile
replacement model.

## What changed

- `AppCommand::UserTurn` and `AppCommand::OverrideTurnContext` now carry
`Option<ActivePermissionProfile>` instead of `PermissionProfile`.
- Composer submissions copy the active permission profile id from the
current session snapshot; legacy snapshots intentionally submit no
active profile id.
- Permission preset UI events now carry only the active built-in profile
id. The app derives the concrete built-in `PermissionProfile` internally
only when updating its local config/status snapshot.
- Permission presets expose their built-in active profile id, and preset
selection preserves that id in both the immediate turn override and the
local TUI config snapshot.
- Turn routing sends `TurnPermissionsOverride::ActiveProfile` when an
active id is present, and only falls back to the legacy sandbox
projection for the remaining runtime override path.

## How to review

Start with `codex-rs/tui/src/app_command.rs` to verify the command shape
no longer exposes `PermissionProfile`.

Then read `codex-rs/tui/src/app/thread_routing.rs` to verify the
app-server turn-start conversion: active ids go through as ids, while
the legacy sandbox fallback is still constrained to the existing runtime
override case.

Finally, check `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget/permission_popups.rs`,
`codex-rs/tui/src/app/event_dispatch.rs`,
`codex-rs/tui/src/app/config_persistence.rs`, and
`codex-rs/utils/approval-presets/src/lib.rs` to see how preset
selections stay id-only across TUI events while the local display/config
mirror still gets a concrete built-in profile.

## Verification

Latest local verification after the id-only `AppEvent` cleanup:

- `cargo check -p codex-tui --tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui
permissions_selection_sends_approvals_reviewer_in_override_turn_context`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui update_feature_flags_enabling_guardian`
- `cargo test -p codex-utils-approval-presets`
- `just fmt`
- `just fix -p codex-tui -p codex-utils-approval-presets`

Earlier in the same PR, before the final event-shape cleanup:

- `cargo test -p codex-tui turn_permissions_`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui submission_`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui
session_configured_syncs_widget_config_permissions_and_cwd`
- `RUST_MIN_STACK=16777216 cargo test -p codex-tui`
2026-05-15 22:42:35 +00:00
Curtis 'Fjord' HawthorneandGitHub 8543e39885 Preserve image detail in app-server inputs (#20693)
## Summary

- Add optional image detail to user image inputs across core, app-server
v2, thread history/event mapping, and the generated app-server
schemas/types.
- Preserve requested detail when serializing Responses image inputs:
omitted detail stays on the existing `high` default, while explicit
`original` keeps local images on the original-resolution path.
- Support `high`/`original` consistently for tool image outputs,
including MCP `codex/imageDetail`, code-mode image helpers, and
`view_image`.
2026-05-15 15:04:04 -07:00
Michael BolinandGitHub c25d905f61 permissions: support workspace roots in profiles (#22610)
## Why

This is the configuration/model half of the alternative permissions
migration we discussed as a comparison point for
[#22401](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22401) and
[#22402](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22402).

The old `workspace-write` model mixes three concerns that we want to
keep separate:
- reusable profile rules that should stay immutable once selected
- user/runtime workspace roots from `cwd`, `--add-dir`, and legacy
workspace-write config
- internal Codex writable roots such as memories, which should not be
shown as user workspace roots

This PR gives permission profiles first-class `workspace_roots` so users
can opt multiple repositories into the same `:workspace_roots` rules
without using broad absolute-path write grants. It also starts
separating the raw selected profile from the effective runtime profile
by making `Permissions` expose explicit accessors instead of public
mutable fields.

A representative `config.toml` looks like this:

```toml
default_permissions = "dev"

[permissions.dev.workspace_roots]
"~/code/openai" = true
"~/code/developers-website" = true

[permissions.dev.filesystem.":workspace_roots"]
"." = "write"
".codex" = "read"
".git" = "read"
".vscode" = "read"
```

If Codex starts in `~/code/codex` with that profile selected, the
effective workspace-root set becomes:
- `~/code/codex` from the runtime `cwd`
- `~/code/openai` from the profile
- `~/code/developers-website` from the profile

The `:workspace_roots` rules are materialized across each root, so
`.git`, `.codex`, and `.vscode` stay scoped the same way everywhere.
Runtime additions such as `--add-dir` can still layer on later stack
entries without mutating the selected profile.

## Stack Shape

This PR intentionally stops before the profile-identity cleanup in
[#22683](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22683) so the base review
stays focused on config loading, workspace-root materialization, and
compatibility with legacy `workspace-write`.

The representation in this PR is therefore transitional: `Permissions`
carries enough state to distinguish the raw constrained profile from the
effective runtime profile, and there are still call sites that must keep
the active profile identity and constrained profile value in sync. The
follow-up PR replaces that with a single resolved profile state
(`ResolvedPermissionProfile` / `PermissionProfileState`) that keeps the
profile id, immutable `PermissionProfile`, and profile-declared
workspace roots together. That follow-up removes APIs such as
`set_constrained_permission_profile_with_active_profile()` where
separate arguments could drift out of sync.

Downstream PRs then build on this base to switch app-server turn updates
to profile ids plus runtime workspace roots and to finish the
user-visible summary behavior. Reviewers should judge this PR as the
workspace-roots foundation, not as the final in-memory shape of selected
permission profiles.

## Review Guide

Suggested review order:

1. Start with `codex-rs/core/src/config/mod.rs`.
This is the main shape change in the base slice. `Permissions` now
stores a private raw `Constrained<PermissionProfile>` plus runtime
`workspace_roots`. Callers use `permission_profile()` when they need the
raw constrained value and `effective_permission_profile()` when they
need a materialized runtime profile. As noted above,
[#22683](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22683) replaces this
transitional shape with a resolved profile state that keeps identity and
profile data together.

2. Review `codex-rs/config/src/permissions_toml.rs` and
`codex-rs/core/src/config/permissions.rs`.
These add `[permissions.<id>.workspace_roots]`, resolve enabled entries
relative to the policy cwd, and keep `:workspace_roots` deny-read glob
patterns symbolic until the actual roots are known.

3. Review `codex-rs/protocol/src/permissions.rs` and
`codex-rs/protocol/src/models.rs`.
These add the policy/profile materialization helpers that expand exact
`:workspace_roots` entries and scoped deny-read globs over every
workspace root. This is also where `ActivePermissionProfileModification`
is removed from the core model.

4. Review the legacy bridge in
`Config::load_from_base_config_with_overrides` and
`Config::set_legacy_sandbox_policy`.
This is where legacy `workspace-write` roots become runtime workspace
roots, while Codex internal writable roots stay internal and do not
appear as user-facing workspace roots.

5. Then skim downstream call sites.
The interesting pattern is raw-vs-effective access: state/proxy/bwrap
paths keep the raw constrained profile, while execution, summaries, and
user-visible status use the effective profile and workspace-root list.

## What Changed

- added `[permissions.<id>.workspace_roots]` to the config model and
schema
- added runtime `workspace_roots` state to `Config`/`Permissions` and
`ConfigOverrides`
- made `Permissions` profile fields private and replaced direct mutation
with accessors/setters
- added `PermissionProfile` and `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` helpers for
materializing `:workspace_roots` exact paths and deny-read globs across
all roots
- moved legacy additional writable roots into runtime workspace-root
state instead of active profile modifications
- removed `ActivePermissionProfileModification` and its app-server
protocol/schema export
- updated sandbox/status summary paths so internal writable roots are
not reported as user workspace roots

## Verification Strategy

The targeted tests cover the behavior at the layers where regressions
are most likely:
- `codex-rs/core/src/config/config_tests.rs` verifies config loading,
legacy workspace-root seeding, effective profile materialization, and
memory-root handling.
- `codex-rs/core/src/config/permissions_tests.rs` verifies profile
`workspace_roots` parsing and `:workspace_roots` scoped/glob
compilation.
- `codex-rs/protocol/src/permissions.rs` unit tests verify exact and
glob materialization over multiple workspace roots.
- `codex-rs/tui/src/status/tests.rs` and
`codex-rs/utils/sandbox-summary/src/sandbox_summary.rs` verify the
user-facing summaries show effective workspace roots and hide internal
writes.

I also ran `cargo check --tests` locally after the latest stack refresh
to catch cross-crate API breakage from the private-field/accessor
changes.







---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22610).
* #22612
* #22611
* #22683
* __->__ #22610
2026-05-14 18:25:23 -07:00
Eric TrautandGitHub 2630a6ca35 Refactor chatwidget input flow into modules (#22407)
## Why

`chatwidget.rs` is still carrying too many unrelated responsibilities in
one file. #22269 started a five-phase effort to move coherent behavior
domains into focused modules while keeping `chatwidget.rs` as the
composition layer.

This PR is phase 2 of that plan. It extracts the input and submission
flow as a mechanical move before the later protocol, popup/status, and
constructor/orchestration phases.

## What Changed

- Added `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget/input_flow.rs` for composer input
results, queued user-message draining, pending-input previews, and
mode-specific submission entry points.
- Added `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget/input_submission.rs` for
user-message construction/submission, shell prompt submission,
structured mention resolution, and blocked image draft restoration.
- Added `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget/input_restore.rs` for
initial-message submission, pending steer restoration after interrupts,
and thread input snapshot/restore behavior.
- Registered the new modules and removed the moved `ChatWidget` impl
methods from `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget.rs`.

## Follow-On Refactor Phases

The five-phase plan from #22269 is:

- Phase 1: mechanical helper and state moves. Completed in #22269.
- Phase 2: extract input and submission flow, including queued user
messages, shell prompt submission, pending steer restoration, and thread
input snapshot/restore behavior. This PR.
- Phase 3: extract protocol, replay, streaming, and tool lifecycle
handling, while preserving active-cell grouping, transcript
invalidation, interrupt deferral, and final-message separator behavior.
- Phase 4: extract settings, popups, and status surfaces, including
model/reasoning/collaboration/personality popups, permission prompts,
rate-limit UI, and connectors helpers.
- Phase 5: clean up the remaining constructor and orchestration code
once the larger behavior domains have moved out, leaving `chatwidget.rs`
as the composition layer.
2026-05-12 21:17:35 -07:00