- Merge ModelFamily into ModelInfo
- Remove logic for adding instructions to apply patch
- Add compaction limit and visible context window to `ModelInfo`
Add `web_search_cached` feature to config. Enables `web_search` tool
with access only to cached/indexed results (see
[docs](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/tools-web-search#live-internet-access)).
This takes precedence over the existing `web_search_request`, which
continues to enable `web_search` over live results as it did before.
`web_search_cached` is disabled for review mode, as `web_search_request`
is.
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Include a link to a bug report or enhancement request.
This PR moves `ModelsFamily` to `openai_models`. It also propagates
`ModelsManager` to session services and use it to drive model family. We
also make `derive_default_model_family` private because it's a step
towards what we want: one place that gives model configuration.
This is a second step at having one source of truth for models
information and config: `ModelsManager`.
Next steps would be to remove `ModelsFamily` from config. That's massive
because it's being used in 41 occasions mostly pre launching `codex`.
Also, we need to make `find_family_for_model` private. It's also big
because it's being used in 21 occasions ~ all tests.
Instead of returning structured out and then re-formatting it into
freeform, return the freeform output from shell_command tool.
Keep `shell` as the default tool for GPT-5.
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Include a link to a bug report or enhancement request.
## Summary
- update documentation, example configs, and automation defaults to
reference gpt-5.1 / gpt-5.1-codex
- bump the CLI and core configuration defaults, model presets, and error
messaging to the new models while keeping the model-family/tool coverage
for legacy slugs
- refresh tests, fixtures, and TUI snapshots so they expect the upgraded
defaults
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core
config::tests::test_precedence_fixture_with_gpt5_profile`
------
[Codex
Task](https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_i_6916c5b3c2b08321ace04ee38604fc6b)
core event to app server event mapping:
1. `codex/event/reasoning_content_delta` ->
`item/reasoning/summaryTextDelta`.
2. `codex/event/reasoning_raw_content_delta` ->
`item/reasoning/textDelta`
3. `codex/event/agent_message_content_delta` →
`item/agentMessage/delta`.
4. `codex/event/agent_reasoning_section_break` ->
`item/reasoning/summaryPartAdded`.
Also added a change in core to pass down content index, summary index
and item id from events.
Tested with the `git checkout owen/app_server_test_client && cargo run
-p codex-app-server-test-client -- send-message-v2 "hello"` and verified
that new events are emitted correctly.
Adds AgentMessageContentDelta, ReasoningContentDelta,
ReasoningRawContentDelta item streaming events while maintaining
compatibility for old events.
---------
Co-authored-by: Owen Lin <owen@openai.com>
In this PR, I am exploring migrating task kind to an invocation of
Codex. The main reason would be getting rid off multiple
`ConversationHistory` state and streamlining our context/history
management.
This approach depends on opening a channel between the sub-codex and
codex. This channel is responsible for forwarding `interactive`
(`approvals`) and `non-interactive` events. The `task` is responsible
for handling those events.
This opens the door for implementing `codex as a tool`, replacing
`compact` and `review`, and potentially subagents.
One consideration is this code is very similar to `app-server` specially
in the approval part. If in the future we wanted an interactive
`sub-codex` we should consider using `codex-mcp`
## Summary
This PR is an alternative approach to #4711, but instead of changing our
storage, parses out shell calls in the client and reserializes them on
the fly before we send them out as part of the request.
What this changes:
1. Adds additional serialization logic when the
ApplyPatchToolType::Freeform is in use.
2. Adds a --custom-apply-patch flag to enable this setting on a
session-by-session basis.
This change is delicate, but is not meant to be permanent. It is meant
to be the first step in a migration:
1. (This PR) Add in-flight serialization with config
2. Update model_family default
3. Update serialization logic to store turn outputs in a structured
format, with logic to serialize based on model_family setting.
4. Remove this rewrite in-flight logic.
## Test Plan
- [x] Additional unit tests added
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Tested locally
# Tool System Refactor
- Centralizes tool definitions and execution in `core/src/tools/*`:
specs (`spec.rs`), handlers (`handlers/*`), router (`router.rs`),
registry/dispatch (`registry.rs`), and shared context (`context.rs`).
One registry now builds the model-visible tool list and binds handlers.
- Router converts model responses to tool calls; Registry dispatches
with consistent telemetry via `codex-rs/otel` and unified error
handling. Function, Local Shell, MCP, and experimental `unified_exec`
all flow through this path; legacy shell aliases still work.
- Rationale: reduce per‑tool boilerplate, keep spec/handler in sync, and
make adding tools predictable and testable.
Example: `read_file`
- Spec: `core/src/tools/spec.rs` (see `create_read_file_tool`,
registered by `build_specs`).
- Handler: `core/src/tools/handlers/read_file.rs` (absolute `file_path`,
1‑indexed `offset`, `limit`, `L#: ` prefixes, safe truncation).
- E2E test: `core/tests/suite/read_file.rs` validates the tool returns
the requested lines.
## Next steps:
- Decompose `handle_container_exec_with_params`
- Add parallel tool calls
We currently get information about rate limits in the response headers.
We want to forward them to the clients to have better transparency.
UI/UX plans have been discussed and this information is needed.
## Summary
Resolves a merge conflict between #3597 and #3560, and adds tests to
double check our apply_patch configuration.
## Testing
- [x] Added unit tests
---------
Co-authored-by: dedrisian-oai <dedrisian@openai.com>
## 📝 Review Mode -- Core
This PR introduces the Core implementation for Review mode:
- New op `Op::Review { prompt: String }:` spawns a child review task
with isolated context, a review‑specific system prompt, and a
`Config.review_model`.
- `EnteredReviewMode`: emitted when the child review session starts.
Every event from this point onwards reflects the review session.
- `ExitedReviewMode(Option<ReviewOutputEvent>)`: emitted when the review
finishes or is interrupted, with optional structured findings:
```json
{
"findings": [
{
"title": "<≤ 80 chars, imperative>",
"body": "<valid Markdown explaining *why* this is a problem; cite files/lines/functions>",
"confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>,
"priority": <int 0-3>,
"code_location": {
"absolute_file_path": "<file path>",
"line_range": {"start": <int>, "end": <int>}
}
}
],
"overall_correctness": "patch is correct" | "patch is incorrect",
"overall_explanation": "<1-3 sentence explanation justifying the overall_correctness verdict>",
"overall_confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>
}
```
## Questions
### Why separate out its own message history?
We want the review thread to match the training of our review models as
much as possible -- that means using a custom prompt, removing user
instructions, and starting a clean chat history.
We also want to make sure the review thread doesn't leak into the parent
thread.
### Why do this as a mode, vs. sub-agents?
1. We want review to be a synchronous task, so it's fine for now to do a
bespoke implementation.
2. We're still unclear about the final structure for sub-agents. We'd
prefer to land this quickly and then refactor into sub-agents without
rushing that implementation.
When item ids are sent to Responses API it will load them from the
database ignoring the provided values. This adds extra latency.
Not having the mode to store requests also allows us to simplify the
code.
## Breaking change
The `disable_response_storage` configuration option is removed.
This PR does the following:
- divides user msgs into 3 categories: plain, user instructions, and
environment context
- Centralizes adding user instructions and environment context to a
degree
- Improve the integration testing
Building on top of #3123
Specifically this
[comment](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/3123#discussion_r2319885089).
We need to send the user message while ignoring the User Instructions
and Environment Context we attach.
## Summary
It appears that #2108 hit a merge conflict with #2355 - I failed to
notice the path difference when re-reviewing the former. This PR
rectifies that, and consolidates it into the protocol package, in line
with our philosophy of specifying types in one place.
## Testing
- [x] Adds config test for model_verbosity
The gpt-oss models require reasoning with subsequent Chat Completions
requests because otherwise the model forgets why the tools were called.
This change fixes that and also adds some additional missing
documentation around how to handle context windows in Ollama and how to
show the CoT if you desire to.
- Introduce websearch end to complement the begin
- Moves the logic of adding the sebsearch tool to
create_tools_json_for_responses_api
- Making it the client responsibility to toggle the tool on or off
- Other misc in #2371 post commit feedback
- Show the query:
<img width="1392" height="151" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8457f1a6-f851-44cf-bcca-0d4fe460ce89"
/>
Adds web_search tool, enabling the model to use Responses API web_search
tool.
- Disabled by default, enabled by --search flag
- When --search is passed, exposes web_search_request function tool to
the model, which triggers user approval. When approved, the model can
use the web_search tool for the remainder of the turn
<img width="1033" height="294" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62ac6563-b946-465c-ba5d-9325af28b28f"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: easong-openai <easong@openai.com>
## Summary
GPT-5 introduced the concept of [custom
tools](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/function-calling#custom-tools),
which allow the model to send a raw string result back, simplifying
json-escape issues. We are migrating gpt-5 to use this by default.
However, gpt-oss models do not support custom tools, only normal
functions. So we keep both tool definitions, and provide whichever one
the model family supports.
## Testing
- [x] Tested locally with various models
- [x] Unit tests pass
**Summary**
- Adds `model_verbosity` config (values: low, medium, high).
- Sends `text.verbosity` only for GPT‑5 family models via the Responses
API.
- Updates docs and adds serialization tests.
**Motivation**
- GPT‑5 introduces a verbosity control to steer output length/detail
without pro
mpt surgery.
- Exposing it as a config knob keeps prompts stable and makes behavior
explicit
and repeatable.
**Changes**
- Config:
- Added `Verbosity` enum (low|medium|high).
- Added optional `model_verbosity` to `ConfigToml`, `Config`, and
`ConfigProfi
le`.
- Request wiring:
- Extended `ResponsesApiRequest` with optional `text` object.
- Populates `text.verbosity` only when model family is `gpt-5`; omitted
otherw
ise.
- Tests:
- Verifies `text.verbosity` serializes when set and is omitted when not
set.
- Docs:
- Added “GPT‑5 Verbosity” section in `codex-rs/README.md`.
- Added `model_verbosity` section to `codex-rs/config.md`.
**Usage**
- In `~/.codex/config.toml`:
- `model = "gpt-5"`
- `model_verbosity = "low"` (or `"medium"` default, `"high"`)
- CLI override example:
- `codex -c model="gpt-5" -c model_verbosity="high"`
**API Impact**
- Requests to GPT‑5 via Responses API include: `text: { verbosity:
"low|medium|h
igh" }` when configured.
- For legacy models or Chat Completions providers, `text` is omitted.
**Backward Compatibility**
- Default behavior unchanged when `model_verbosity` is not set (server
default “
medium”).
**Testing**
- Added unit tests for serialization/omission of `text.verbosity`.
- Ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo test --all-features` (all green).
**Docs**
- `README.md`: new “GPT‑5 Verbosity” note under Config with example.
- `config.md`: new `model_verbosity` section.
**Out of Scope**
- No changes to temperature/top_p or other GPT‑5 parameters.
- No changes to Chat Completions wiring.
**Risks / Notes**
- If OpenAI changes the wire shape for verbosity, we may need to update
`Respons
esApiRequest`.
- Behavior gated to `gpt-5` model family to avoid unexpected effects
elsewhere.
**Checklist**
- [x] Code gated to GPT‑5 family only
- [x] Docs updated (`README.md`, `config.md`)
- [x] Tests added and passing
- [x] Formatting applied
Release note: Add `model_verbosity` config to control GPT‑5 output verbosity via the Responses API (low|medium|high).
## Summary
We've experienced a bit of drift in system prompting for `apply_patch`:
- As pointed out in #2030 , our prettier formatting started altering
prompt.md in a few ways
- We introduced a separate markdown file for apply_patch instructions in
#993, but currently duplicate them in the prompt.md file
- We added a first-class apply_patch tool in #2303, which has yet
another definition
This PR starts to consolidate our logic in a few ways:
- We now only use
`apply_patch_tool_instructions.md](https://github.com/openai/codex/compare/dh--apply-patch-tool-definition?expand=1#diff-d4fffee5f85cb1975d3f66143a379e6c329de40c83ed5bf03ffd3829df985bea)
for system instructions
- We no longer include apply_patch system instructions if the tool is
specified
I'm leaving the definition in openai_tools.rs as duplicated text for now
because we're going to be iterated on the first-class tool soon.
## Testing
- [x] Added integration tests to verify prompt stability
- [x] Tested locally with several different models (gpt-5, gpt-oss,
o4-mini)
This pull request resolves#2296; I've confirmed if it works by:
1. Add settings to ~/.codex/config.toml:
```toml
model_reasoning_effort = "minimal"
```
2. Run the CLI:
```
cd codex-rs
cargo build && RUST_LOG=trace cargo run --bin codex
/status
tail -f ~/.codex/log/codex-tui.log
```
Co-authored-by: pakrym-oai <pakrym@openai.com>
This PR:
* Added the clippy.toml to configure allowable expect / unwrap usage in
tests
* Removed as many expect/allow lines as possible from tests
* moved a bunch of allows to expects where possible
Note: in integration tests, non `#[test]` helper functions are not
covered by this so we had to leave a few lingering `expect(expect_used`
checks around
## Summary
Currently, we use request-time logic to determine the user_instructions
and environment_context messages. This means that neither of these
values can change over time as conversations go on. We want to add in
additional details here, so we're migrating these to save these messages
to the rollout file instead. This is simpler for the client, and allows
us to append additional environment_context messages to each turn if we
want
## Testing
- [x] Integration test coverage
- [x] Tested locally with a few turns, confirmed model could reference
environment context and cached token metrics were reasonably high
Wait for newlines, then render markdown on a line by line basis. Word wrap it for the current terminal size and then spit it out line by line into the UI. Also adds tests and fixes some UI regressions.
Ahmed IbrahimandGitHub
sayan-oaiandGitHub
jif-oaiandGitHub
YorlingandGitHub
Dylan HurdandGitHub
Celia ChenandGitHub
Michael BolinandGitHub
Dominik KundelandGitHub
vjain419andGitHub
Parker ThompsonandGitHub