## Summary
- collapse parsed command output to a single `Unknown` whenever the
normal parse includes any unknown entry
- preserve the existing parsing flow and existing `cd` handling,
including the current `cd && ...` collapse behavior
- trim redundant tests and add focused coverage for collapse-on-unknown
cases
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-shell-command`
## Why
[#12964](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/12964) added
`host_executable()` support to `codex-execpolicy`, and
[#13046](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/13046) adopted it in the
zsh-fork interception path.
The remaining gap was the preflight execpolicy check in
`core/src/exec_policy.rs`. That path derives approval requirements
before execution for `shell`, `shell_command`, and `unified_exec`, but
it was still using the default exact-token matcher.
As a result, a command that already included an absolute executable
path, such as `/usr/bin/git status`, could still miss a basename rule
like `prefix_rule(pattern = ["git"], ...)` during preflight even when
the policy also defined a matching `host_executable(name = "git", ...)`
entry.
This PR brings the same opt-in `host_executable()` resolution to the
preflight approval path when an absolute program path is already present
in the parsed command.
## What Changed
- updated
`ExecPolicyManager::create_exec_approval_requirement_for_command()` in
`core/src/exec_policy.rs` to use `check_multiple_with_options(...)` with
`MatchOptions { resolve_host_executables: true }`
- kept the existing shell parsing flow for approval derivation, but now
allow basename rules to match absolute executable paths during preflight
when `host_executable()` permits it
- updated requested-prefix amendment evaluation to use the same
host-executable-aware matching mode, so suggested `prefix_rule()`
amendments are checked consistently for absolute-path commands
- added preflight coverage for:
- absolute-path commands that should match basename rules through
`host_executable()`
- absolute-path commands whose paths are not in the allowed
`host_executable()` mapping
- requested prefix-rule amendments for absolute-path commands
## Verification
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib exec_policy::tests::`
## Summary
Fixes a few things in our exec_policy handling of prefix_rules:
1. Correctly match redirects specifically for exec_policy parsing. i.e.
if you have `prefix_rule(["echo"], decision="allow")` then `echo hello >
output.txt` should match - this should fix#10321
2. If there already exists any rule that would match our prefix rule
(not just a prompt), then drop it, since it won't do anything.
## Testing
- [x] Updated unit tests, added approvals ScenarioSpecs
### Motivation
- Git subcommand matching was being classified as "dangerous" and caused
benign developer workflows (for example `git push --force-with-lease`)
to be blocked by the preflight policy.
- The change aligns behavior with the intent to reserve the dangerous
checklist for truly destructive shell ops (e.g. `rm -rf`) and avoid
surprising developer-facing blocks.
### Description
- Remove git-specific subcommand checks from
`is_dangerous_to_call_with_exec` in
`codex-rs/shell-command/src/command_safety/is_dangerous_command.rs`,
leaving only explicit `rm` and `sudo` passthrough checks.
- Deleted the git-specific helper logic that classified `reset`,
`branch`-delete, `push` (force/delete/refspec) and `clean --force` as
dangerous.
- Updated unit tests in the same file to assert that various `git
reset`/`git branch`/`git push`/`git clean` variants are no longer
classified as dangerous.
- Kept `find_git_subcommand` (used by safe-command classification)
intact so safe/unsafe parsing elsewhere remains functional.
### Testing
- Ran formatter with `just fmt` successfully.
- Ran unit tests with `cargo test -p codex-shell-command` and all tests
passed (`144 passed; 0 failed`).
------
[Codex
Task](https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_i_698d19dedb4883299c3ceb5bbc6a0dcf)
## Summary
This should rarely, if ever, happen in practice. But regardless, we
should never provide an empty list of `commands` to ExecPolicy. This PR
is almost entirely adding test around these cases.
## Testing
- [x] Adds a bunch of unit tests for this
Jeremy Rose ·
Michael Bolin ·
Dylan Hurd ·
Josh McKinney ·