Deferred dynamic tools need to round-trip a namespace so a tool returned
by `tool_search` can be called through the same registry key that core
uses for dispatch.
This change adds namespace support for dynamic tool specs/calls,
persists it through app-server thread state, and routes dynamic tool
calls by full `ToolName` while still sending the app the leaf tool name.
Deferred dynamic tools must provide a namespace; non-deferred dynamic
tools may remain top-level.
It also introduces `LoadableToolSpec` as the shared
function-or-namespace Responses shape used by both `tool_search` output
and dynamic tool registration, so dynamic tools use the same wrapping
logic in both paths.
Validation:
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tool_search`
---------
Co-authored-by: Sayan Sisodiya <sayan@openai.com>
## Why
This continues the `codex-tools` migration by moving one more piece of
generic tool-definition bookkeeping out of `codex-core`.
The earlier extraction steps moved shared schema parsing into
`codex-tools`, but `core/src/tools/spec.rs` still had to supply tool
names separately and perform ad hoc rewrites for deferred MCP aliases.
That meant the crate boundary was still awkward: the parsed shape coming
back from `codex-tools` was missing part of the definition that
`codex-core` ultimately needs to assemble a `ResponsesApiTool`.
This change introduces a named `ToolDefinition` in `codex-tools` so both
MCP tools and dynamic tools cross the crate boundary in the same
reusable model. `codex-core` still owns the final `ResponsesApiTool`
assembly, but less of the generic tool-definition shaping logic stays
behind in `core`.
## What changed
- replaced `ParsedToolDefinition` with a named `ToolDefinition` in
`codex-rs/tools/src/tool_definition.rs`
- added `codex-rs/tools/src/tool_definition_tests.rs` for `renamed()`
and `into_deferred()`
- updated `parse_dynamic_tool()` and `parse_mcp_tool()` to return
`ToolDefinition`
- simplified `codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec.rs` so it adapts
`ToolDefinition` into `ResponsesApiTool` instead of rewriting names and
deferred fields inline
- updated parser tests and `codex-rs/tools/README.md` to reflect the
named tool-definition model
## Test plan
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::spec::`
## Why
`codex-tools` already owned the shared JSON schema parser and the MCP
tool schema adapter, but `core/src/tools/spec.rs` still parsed dynamic
tools directly.
That left the tool-schema boundary split in two different ways:
- MCP tools flowed through `codex-tools`, while dynamic tools were still
parsed in `codex-core`
- the extracted dynamic-tool path initially introduced a
dynamic-specific parsed shape even though `codex-tools` already had very
similar MCP adapter output
This change finishes that extraction boundary in one step. `codex-core`
still owns `ResponsesApiTool` assembly, but both MCP tools and dynamic
tools now enter that layer through `codex-tools` using the same parsed
tool-definition shape.
## What changed
- added `tools/src/dynamic_tool.rs` and sibling
`tools/src/dynamic_tool_tests.rs`
- introduced `parse_dynamic_tool()` in `codex-tools` and switched
`core/src/tools/spec.rs` to use it for dynamic tools
- added `tools/src/parsed_tool_definition.rs` so both MCP and dynamic
adapters return the same `ParsedToolDefinition`
- updated `core/src/tools/spec.rs` to build `ResponsesApiTool` through a
shared local adapter helper instead of separate MCP and dynamic assembly
paths
- expanded `core/src/tools/spec_tests.rs` so the dynamic-tool adapter
test asserts the full converted `ResponsesApiTool`, including
`defer_loading`
- updated `codex-rs/tools/README.md` to reflect the shared parsed
tool-definition boundary
## Test plan
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::spec::`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/15944).
* #15953
* __->__ #15944
pash-openai ·
Vivian Fang ·
Michael Bolin ·