## Summary
- add `self_serve_business_usage_based` and `enterprise_cbp_usage_based`
to the public/internal plan enums and regenerate the app-server + Python
SDK artifacts
- map both plans through JWT login and backend rate-limit payloads, then
bucket them with the existing Team/Business entitlement behavior in
cloud requirements, usage-limit copy, tooltips, and status display
- keep the earlier display-label remap commit on this branch so the new
Team-like and Business-like plans render consistently in the UI
## Testing
- `just write-app-server-schema`
- `uv run --project sdk/python python
sdk/python/scripts/update_sdk_artifacts.py generate-types`
- `just fix -p codex-protocol -p codex-login -p codex-core -p
codex-backend-client -p codex-cloud-requirements -p codex-tui -p
codex-tui-app-server -p codex-backend-openapi-models`
- `just fmt`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
- `cargo test -p codex-protocol
usage_based_plan_types_use_expected_wire_names`
- `cargo test -p codex-login usage_based`
- `cargo test -p codex-backend-client usage_based`
- `cargo test -p codex-cloud-requirements usage_based`
- `cargo test -p codex-core usage_limit_reached_error_formats_`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui plan_type_display_name_remaps_display_labels`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui remapped`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server
plan_type_display_name_remaps_display_labels`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server remapped`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server
preserves_usage_based_plan_type_wire_name`
## Notes
- a broader multi-crate `cargo test` run still hits unrelated existing
guardian-approval config failures in
`codex-rs/core/src/config/config_tests.rs`
Added multi-limit support end-to-end by carrying limit_name in
rate-limit snapshots and handling multiple buckets instead of only
codex.
Extended /usage client parsing to consume additional_rate_limits
Updated TUI /status and in-memory state to store/render per-limit
snapshots
Extended app-server rate-limit read response: kept rate_limits and added
rate_limits_by_name.
Adjusted usage-limit error messaging for non-default codex limit buckets
Similar to what @sayan-oai did in openai/codex#8956 for
`config.schema.json`, this PR updates the repo so that it includes the
output of `codex app-server generate-json-schema` and `codex app-server
generate-ts` and adds a test to verify it is in sync with the current
code.
Motivation:
- This makes any schema changes introduced by a PR transparent during
code review.
- In particular, this should help us catch PRs that would introduce a
non-backwards-compatible change to the app schema (eventually, this
should also be enforced by tooling).
- Once https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/10231 is in to formalize the
notion of "experimental" fields, we can work on ensuring the
non-experimental bits are backwards-compatible.
`codex-rs/app-server-protocol/tests/schema_fixtures.rs` was added as the
test and `just write-app-server-schema` can be use to generate the
vendored schema files.
Incidentally, when I run:
```
rg _ codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema/typescript/v2
```
I see a number of `snake_case` names that should be `camelCase`.
bwanner-oai ·
xl-openai ·
Michael Bolin ·