Commit Graph

5 Commits

  • core: set permission profiles from snapshots (#22920)
    ## Why
    
    #22891 moved the TUI turn-command path to pass `ActivePermissionProfile`
    instead of the full `PermissionProfile`, but the remaining
    config/session bridge still accepted the concrete `PermissionProfile`
    and active profile id as separate arguments. That shape made it too easy
    for future callers to update the concrete profile and active profile id
    out of sync.
    
    This PR makes the trusted session snapshot path pass one coherent value
    into `Permissions`, while keeping `requirements.toml` enforcement owned
    by the existing constrained permission state.
    
    ## What Changed
    
    - Added `PermissionProfileSnapshot` as the public snapshot value for
    trusted session/config synchronization.
    - Changed `Permissions::set_permission_profile_from_session_snapshot()`
    and `replace_permission_profile_from_session_snapshot()` to take a
    `PermissionProfileSnapshot`.
    - Updated the replacement path to derive its constrained
    `PermissionProfile` from the snapshot, so callers cannot pass a separate
    profile that disagrees with the snapshot.
    - Removed the internal tuple-style
    `PermissionProfileState::set_active_permission_profile()` mutation path.
    - Updated core session projection and TUI call sites to construct
    explicit legacy or active snapshots.
    - Documented the snapshot constructors so legacy use and id/profile
    mismatch hazards are called out at the API boundary.
    - Added a focused config test that verifies snapshot updates still
    respect existing permission constraints.
    
    ## How To Review
    
    1. Start with `codex-rs/core/src/config/resolved_permission_profile.rs`;
    `PermissionProfileSnapshot` is the public wrapper, while
    `ResolvedPermissionProfile` stays internal.
    2. Check `codex-rs/core/src/config/mod.rs` to confirm both
    session-snapshot setters validate through `PermissionProfileState` and
    no longer accept loose profile/id pairs.
    3. Skim `codex-rs/core/src/session/session.rs` for the session
    projection path; it now builds the snapshot before installing it.
    4. Skim the TUI changes as call-site migration from loose argument pairs
    to explicit snapshot construction.
    
    ## Verification
    
    - `cargo test -p codex-core
    permission_snapshot_setter_preserves_permission_constraints`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui status_permissions_`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui
    session_configured_preserves_profile_workspace_roots`
    - `just fix -p codex-core -p codex-tui`
  • app-server: use permission ids and runtime workspace roots (#22611)
    ## Why
    
    This PR builds on [#22610](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22610)
    and is the app-server side of the migration from mutable per-turn
    `SandboxPolicy` replacement toward selecting immutable permission
    profiles by id plus mutable runtime workspace roots.
    
    Once permission profiles can carry their own immutable
    `workspace_roots`, app-server no longer needs to mutate the selected
    `PermissionProfile` just to represent thread-specific filesystem
    context. The mutable part now lives on the thread as explicit
    `runtimeWorkspaceRoots`, while `:workspace_roots` remains symbolic until
    the sandbox is realized for a turn.
    
    ## What Changed
    
    - Replaced the v2 permission-selection wrapper surface with plain
    profile ids for `thread/start`, `thread/resume`, `thread/fork`, and
    `turn/start`.
    - Removed the API surface for profile modifications
    (`PermissionProfileSelectionParams`,
    `PermissionProfileModificationParams`,
    `ActivePermissionProfileModification`).
    - Added experimental `runtimeWorkspaceRoots` fields to the thread
    lifecycle and turn-start APIs.
    - Threaded runtime workspace roots through core session/thread
    snapshots, turn overrides, app-server request handling, and command
    execution permission resolution.
    - Kept session permission state symbolic so later runtime root updates
    and cwd-only implicit-root retargeting rebind `:workspace_roots`
    correctly.
    - Updated the embedded clients just enough to send and restore the new
    thread state.
    - Refreshed the generated schema/TypeScript artifacts and the app-server
    README to match the new contract.
    
    ## Verification
    
    Targeted coverage for this layer lives in:
    
    - `codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2/tests.rs`
    - `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/v2/thread_start.rs`
    - `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/v2/thread_resume.rs`
    - `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/v2/turn_start.rs`
    - `codex-rs/core/src/session/tests.rs`
    
    The key regression checks exercise that:
    
    - `runtimeWorkspaceRoots` resolve against the effective cwd on thread
    start.
    - Profile-declared workspace roots are excluded from the runtime
    workspace roots returned by app-server.
    - A turn-level runtime workspace-root update persists onto the thread
    and is returned by `thread/resume`.
    - A named permission profile selected on one turn remains symbolic so a
    later runtime-root-only turn update changes the actual sandbox writes.
    - A cwd-only turn update retargets the implicit runtime cwd root while
    preserving additional runtime roots.
    - The protocol fixtures and generated client artifacts stay in sync with
    the string-based permission selection contract.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ---
    [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
    Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
    with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22611).
    * #22612
    * __->__ #22611
  • permissions: resolve profile identity with constraints (#22683)
    ## Why
    
    This PR is the invariant-cleanup layer that follows the workspace-roots
    base merged in [#22610](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22610).
    
    #22610 adds `[permissions.<id>.workspace_roots]` and keeps runtime
    workspace roots separate from the raw permission profile, but its
    in-memory representation is intentionally transitional: `Permissions`
    still carries the selected profile identity next to a constrained
    `PermissionProfile`. That makes APIs such as
    `set_constrained_permission_profile_with_active_profile()` fragile
    because the id and value only mean the right thing when every caller
    keeps them in sync.
    
    This PR introduces a single resolved profile state so profile identity,
    `extends`, the profile value, and profile-declared workspace roots
    travel together. The next PR,
    [#22611](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22611), builds on this by
    changing the app-server turn API to select permission profiles by id
    plus runtime workspace roots.
    
    ## Stack Context
    
    - #22610, now merged: adds profile-declared `workspace_roots`, runtime
    workspace roots, and `:workspace_roots` materialization.
    - This PR: replaces the parallel active-profile/profile-value fields
    with `PermissionProfileState`.
    - #22611: switches app-server turn updates toward profile ids plus
    runtime workspace roots.
    - #22612: updates TUI/exec summaries to show the effective workspace
    roots.
    
    Keeping this separate from #22611 is deliberate: reviewers can validate
    the internal state invariant before reviewing the app-server protocol
    migration.
    
    ## What Changed
    
    - Added `ResolvedPermissionProfile::{Legacy, BuiltIn, Named}` and
    `PermissionProfileState`.
    - Typed built-in profile ids with `BuiltInPermissionProfileId`.
    - Moved selected profile identity and profile-declared workspace roots
    into the resolved state.
    - Replaced `Permissions` parallel profile fields with one
    `permission_profile_state`.
    - Removed `set_constrained_permission_profile_with_active_profile()`
    from session sync paths.
    - Kept trusted session replay/`SessionConfigured` compatibility through
    explicit session snapshot helpers.
    - Updated session configuration, MCP initialization, app-server, exec,
    TUI, and guardian call sites to consume `&PermissionProfile` directly.
    
    ## Review Guide
    
    Start with `codex-rs/core/src/config/resolved_permission_profile.rs`; it
    is the new invariant boundary. Then review
    `codex-rs/core/src/config/mod.rs` to see how config loading records
    active profile identity and profile workspace roots. The remaining
    call-site changes are mostly mechanical fallout from
    `Permissions::permission_profile()` returning `&PermissionProfile`
    instead of `&Constrained<PermissionProfile>`.
    
    ## Verification
    
    The existing config/session coverage now constructs and asserts through
    `PermissionProfileState`. The workspace-root config test also asserts
    that profile-declared roots are preserved in the resolved state, which
    is the behavior #22611 relies on when runtime roots become mutable
    through the app-server API.
    
    ---
    [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
    Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
    with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22683).
    * #22612
    * #22611
    * __->__ #22683
  • permissions: support workspace roots in profiles (#22610)
    ## Why
    
    This is the configuration/model half of the alternative permissions
    migration we discussed as a comparison point for
    [#22401](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22401) and
    [#22402](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22402).
    
    The old `workspace-write` model mixes three concerns that we want to
    keep separate:
    - reusable profile rules that should stay immutable once selected
    - user/runtime workspace roots from `cwd`, `--add-dir`, and legacy
    workspace-write config
    - internal Codex writable roots such as memories, which should not be
    shown as user workspace roots
    
    This PR gives permission profiles first-class `workspace_roots` so users
    can opt multiple repositories into the same `:workspace_roots` rules
    without using broad absolute-path write grants. It also starts
    separating the raw selected profile from the effective runtime profile
    by making `Permissions` expose explicit accessors instead of public
    mutable fields.
    
    A representative `config.toml` looks like this:
    
    ```toml
    default_permissions = "dev"
    
    [permissions.dev.workspace_roots]
    "~/code/openai" = true
    "~/code/developers-website" = true
    
    [permissions.dev.filesystem.":workspace_roots"]
    "." = "write"
    ".codex" = "read"
    ".git" = "read"
    ".vscode" = "read"
    ```
    
    If Codex starts in `~/code/codex` with that profile selected, the
    effective workspace-root set becomes:
    - `~/code/codex` from the runtime `cwd`
    - `~/code/openai` from the profile
    - `~/code/developers-website` from the profile
    
    The `:workspace_roots` rules are materialized across each root, so
    `.git`, `.codex`, and `.vscode` stay scoped the same way everywhere.
    Runtime additions such as `--add-dir` can still layer on later stack
    entries without mutating the selected profile.
    
    ## Stack Shape
    
    This PR intentionally stops before the profile-identity cleanup in
    [#22683](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22683) so the base review
    stays focused on config loading, workspace-root materialization, and
    compatibility with legacy `workspace-write`.
    
    The representation in this PR is therefore transitional: `Permissions`
    carries enough state to distinguish the raw constrained profile from the
    effective runtime profile, and there are still call sites that must keep
    the active profile identity and constrained profile value in sync. The
    follow-up PR replaces that with a single resolved profile state
    (`ResolvedPermissionProfile` / `PermissionProfileState`) that keeps the
    profile id, immutable `PermissionProfile`, and profile-declared
    workspace roots together. That follow-up removes APIs such as
    `set_constrained_permission_profile_with_active_profile()` where
    separate arguments could drift out of sync.
    
    Downstream PRs then build on this base to switch app-server turn updates
    to profile ids plus runtime workspace roots and to finish the
    user-visible summary behavior. Reviewers should judge this PR as the
    workspace-roots foundation, not as the final in-memory shape of selected
    permission profiles.
    
    ## Review Guide
    
    Suggested review order:
    
    1. Start with `codex-rs/core/src/config/mod.rs`.
    This is the main shape change in the base slice. `Permissions` now
    stores a private raw `Constrained<PermissionProfile>` plus runtime
    `workspace_roots`. Callers use `permission_profile()` when they need the
    raw constrained value and `effective_permission_profile()` when they
    need a materialized runtime profile. As noted above,
    [#22683](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22683) replaces this
    transitional shape with a resolved profile state that keeps identity and
    profile data together.
    
    2. Review `codex-rs/config/src/permissions_toml.rs` and
    `codex-rs/core/src/config/permissions.rs`.
    These add `[permissions.<id>.workspace_roots]`, resolve enabled entries
    relative to the policy cwd, and keep `:workspace_roots` deny-read glob
    patterns symbolic until the actual roots are known.
    
    3. Review `codex-rs/protocol/src/permissions.rs` and
    `codex-rs/protocol/src/models.rs`.
    These add the policy/profile materialization helpers that expand exact
    `:workspace_roots` entries and scoped deny-read globs over every
    workspace root. This is also where `ActivePermissionProfileModification`
    is removed from the core model.
    
    4. Review the legacy bridge in
    `Config::load_from_base_config_with_overrides` and
    `Config::set_legacy_sandbox_policy`.
    This is where legacy `workspace-write` roots become runtime workspace
    roots, while Codex internal writable roots stay internal and do not
    appear as user-facing workspace roots.
    
    5. Then skim downstream call sites.
    The interesting pattern is raw-vs-effective access: state/proxy/bwrap
    paths keep the raw constrained profile, while execution, summaries, and
    user-visible status use the effective profile and workspace-root list.
    
    ## What Changed
    
    - added `[permissions.<id>.workspace_roots]` to the config model and
    schema
    - added runtime `workspace_roots` state to `Config`/`Permissions` and
    `ConfigOverrides`
    - made `Permissions` profile fields private and replaced direct mutation
    with accessors/setters
    - added `PermissionProfile` and `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` helpers for
    materializing `:workspace_roots` exact paths and deny-read globs across
    all roots
    - moved legacy additional writable roots into runtime workspace-root
    state instead of active profile modifications
    - removed `ActivePermissionProfileModification` and its app-server
    protocol/schema export
    - updated sandbox/status summary paths so internal writable roots are
    not reported as user workspace roots
    
    ## Verification Strategy
    
    The targeted tests cover the behavior at the layers where regressions
    are most likely:
    - `codex-rs/core/src/config/config_tests.rs` verifies config loading,
    legacy workspace-root seeding, effective profile materialization, and
    memory-root handling.
    - `codex-rs/core/src/config/permissions_tests.rs` verifies profile
    `workspace_roots` parsing and `:workspace_roots` scoped/glob
    compilation.
    - `codex-rs/protocol/src/permissions.rs` unit tests verify exact and
    glob materialization over multiple workspace roots.
    - `codex-rs/tui/src/status/tests.rs` and
    `codex-rs/utils/sandbox-summary/src/sandbox_summary.rs` verify the
    user-facing summaries show effective workspace roots and hide internal
    writes.
    
    I also ran `cargo check --tests` locally after the latest stack refresh
    to catch cross-crate API breakage from the private-field/accessor
    changes.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ---
    [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
    Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
    with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22610).
    * #22612
    * #22611
    * #22683
    * __->__ #22610
  • Refactor chatwidget orchestration into modules (phase 5) (#22537)
    ## Why
    
    `chatwidget.rs` is still carrying too many unrelated responsibilities in
    one file. #22269 started a five-phase cleanup to move coherent behavior
    domains into focused modules while keeping `chatwidget.rs` as the
    composition layer. #22407 completed phase 2 by extracting input and
    submission flow, #22433 completed phase 3 by extracting protocol,
    replay, streaming, and tool lifecycle handling, and #22518 completed
    phase 4 by extracting settings, popups, and status surfaces.
    
    This PR is phase 5. It cleans up the remaining constructor and
    orchestration code now that the larger behavior domains have moved out,
    leaving `chatwidget.rs` much closer to the composition layer the cleanup
    was aiming for. This is once again a mechanical movement of existing
    functions. No functional changes.
    
    ## What Changed
    
    - Added focused modules for widget construction and initial wiring,
    session configuration flow, key/composer interaction routing, review
    popup orchestration, desktop notification coalescing, and render
    composition.
    - Moved the remaining constructor, session setup, interaction,
    notification, review picker, and rendering helpers out of
    `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget.rs`.
    - Preserved the existing startup/session behavior, keyboard handling,
    review picker flow, notification priority behavior, and render
    composition while shrinking the central widget module substantially.
    - Left `codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget.rs` as the registration and
    composition surface for the extracted behavior modules.
    
    ## Cleanup Phases
    
    The five-phase cleanup plan from #22269 is:
    
    1. Phase 1: mechanical helper and state moves. Completed in #22269.
    2. Phase 2: extract input and submission flow, including queued user
    messages, shell prompt submission, pending steer restoration, and thread
    input snapshot/restore behavior. Completed in #22407.
    3. Phase 3: extract protocol, replay, streaming, and tool lifecycle
    handling, while preserving active-cell grouping, transcript
    invalidation, interrupt deferral, and final-message separator behavior.
    Completed in #22433.
    4. Phase 4: extract settings, popups, and status surfaces, including
    model/reasoning/collaboration/personality popups, permission prompts,
    rate-limit UI, and connectors helpers. Completed in #22518.
    5. Phase 5: clean up the remaining constructor and orchestration code
    once the larger behavior domains have moved out, leaving `chatwidget.rs`
    as the composition layer. This PR.
    
    ## Verification
    
    - `cargo check -p codex-tui`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui chatwidget::tests::popups_and_settings`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui chatwidget::tests::plan_mode`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui chatwidget::tests::review_mode`
    - `cargo test -p codex-tui chatwidget::tests::status_and_layout`
    
    `cargo test -p codex-tui` also compiles and begins running, but aborts
    in the unchanged app-side test
    `app::tests::discard_side_thread_keeps_local_state_when_server_close_fails`
    with the same reproducible stack overflow noted in phase 4.