## Why
Code mode can use nested unified exec calls as data sources. When those
calls omit `max_output_tokens`, code mode should receive raw command
output so the script can parse or summarize it itself. When code mode
does provide `max_output_tokens`, that explicit nested budget should be
respected, including values above the default unified exec limit, rather
than being capped before code mode sees the result.
## What
- Preserve direct unified exec truncation behavior, while letting
code-mode exec/write_stdin keep `max_output_tokens` as `None` unless
explicitly supplied.
- Make code-mode tool results use raw output when no explicit limit is
present, and use the explicit nested limit directly when one is
specified.
- Refactor unified exec output formatting so `truncated_output` takes
the caller-selected token budget.
- Add e2e integration coverage for explicit nested exec limits, omitted
nested exec limits, outer exec limit propagation, omitted-limit outputs
that exceed both the default and a small truncation policy, explicit
nested limits above those caps, and high explicit limits that still
compact larger command output.
- Reuse the code-mode turn setup helper while directly asserting the
exact exec output item in each test.
## Testing
- `just fmt`
- `git diff --check`
- Not run locally per repo guidance; CI should validate the e2e
integration tests.
## Why
Codex still models model-visible tools and executable behavior largely
inside `codex-core`, which makes it harder to evolve the tool system
toward a single reusable abstraction for built-ins, MCP-backed tools,
dynamic tools, and later tools injected from outside core.
This PR takes the next incremental step in that direction by moving the
common execution-facing pieces out of core and separating them from
core-only orchestration. The intent is to let shared tool abstractions
improve in one place, while `codex-core` keeps the parts that are still
inherently host-specific today, such as `ToolInvocation`, dispatch
wiring, and hook integration.
This PR is mostly moving things around. The only interesting piece is
this abstraction:
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/22359/changes#diff-81af519002548ba51ed102bdaaf77e081d40a1e73a6e5f9b104bbbc96a6f1b3dR13
## What changed
- Added `codex_tools::ToolExecutor<Invocation>` as the shared execution
trait for model-visible tools.
- Moved the reusable execution support types from `codex-core` into
`codex-tools`:
- `FunctionCallError`
- `ToolPayload`
- `ToolOutput`
- Refactored core tool implementations so that execution behavior lives
on `ToolExecutor<ToolInvocation>`, while `ToolHandler` remains the
core-local extension point for hook payloads, telemetry tags, diff
consumers, and other orchestration concerns.
- Kept the registry and dispatch flow behaviorally unchanged while
making the shared/extracted boundary explicit across built-in, MCP,
dynamic, extension-backed, shell, and multi-agent tool handlers.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `just fix -p codex-tools`
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo test -p codex-core` progressed through the updated tool
surfaces and then hit the existing unrelated multi-agent stack overflow
in
`tools::handlers::multi_agents::tests::tool_handlers_cascade_close_and_resume_and_keep_explicitly_closed_subtrees_closed`.
## Why
The MCP tool path had accumulated a few core-owned special cases: a
dedicated payload variant, resolver plumbing, a legacy `AfterToolUse`
translation path, and a side channel for parallel-call metadata. That
made `ToolRegistry` and the spec builder know more about MCP than they
needed to.
This change moves MCP-specific execution details back onto `ToolInfo`
and `McpHandler` so `codex-core` can treat MCP calls like normal
function calls while still preserving MCP-specific dispatch and
telemetry behavior where it belongs.
## What changed
- removed `resolve_mcp_tool_info`, `ToolPayload::Mcp`, `ToolKind`, and
the remaining registry-side MCP resolver path
- stored MCP routing metadata directly on `McpHandler` and `ToolInfo`,
including `supports_parallel_tool_calls`
- deleted the legacy `AfterToolUse` consumer in `core`, which removes
the need for handler-specific `after_tool_use_payload` implementations
- switched tool-result telemetry to handler-provided tags and kept
MCP-specific dispatch payload construction inside the handler
- simplified tool spec planning/building by passing `ToolInfo` directly
and dropping the direct/deferred MCP wrapper structs and the
parallel-server side table
## Testing
- `cargo check -p codex-core -p codex-mcp -p codex-otel`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
mcp_parallel_support_uses_exact_payload_server`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
direct_mcp_tools_register_namespaced_handlers`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
search_tool_description_lists_each_mcp_source_once`
- `cargo test -p codex-mcp
list_all_tools_uses_startup_snapshot_while_client_is_pending`
- `just fix -p codex-core -p codex-mcp -p codex-otel`
## Why
Large MCP tool call outputs can make rollout JSONL files enormous. In
the session that motivated this change, the biggest JSONL records were:
- `event_msg/mcp_tool_call_end`
- `response_item/function_call_output`
both containing the same unbounded MCP payloads - just 3 MCP tool calls
that each were multi-hundred MBs 😱
This PR truncates both of those JSONL records.
## How
#### For `response_item/function_call_output`
Unified exec already bounds tool output before it is injected into
model-facing history, which also keeps the corresponding rollout
`response_item/function_call_output` records small.
MCP should follow the same pattern: truncate the model-facing tool
output at the tool-output boundary, while leaving code-mode/raw hook
consumers alone.
#### For `event_msg/mcp_tool_call_end`
`McpToolCallEnd` also needs its own bounded event copy because it is the
app-server/replay/UI event shape that backs `ThreadItem::McpToolCall`.
Unfortunately this is _not_ downstream of the `ToolOutput` trait.
## Model behavior
Model behavior is actually unchanged as a result of this PR.
Before this PR, MCP output was:
1. Converted to `FunctionCallOutput`.
2. Recorded into in-memory history.
3. Truncated by `ContextManager::record_items()` before later model
turns saw it.
After this branch, MCP output is truncated earlier, in
`McpToolOutput::response_payload()`, using the same helper. Then
`ContextManager::record_items()` sees an already-truncated output and
effectively has little/no additional work to do.
So the model should still see the same kind of truncated function-call
output. The practical difference is where truncation happens: earlier,
before rollout persistence/app-server emission can see the giant
payload.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-core mcp_tool_output`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
mcp_tool_call::tests::truncate_mcp_tool_result_for_event`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
mcp_post_tool_use_payload_uses_model_tool_name_args_and_result`
- `just fmt`
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `git diff --check`
## Summary
Lifecycle hooks currently treat `PreToolUse`, `PostToolUse`, and
`PermissionRequest` as Bash-only flows
- hook schema constrains `tool_name` to `Bash`
- hook input assumes a command-shaped `tool_input`
- core hook dispatch path passes only shell command strings
That means hooks cannot target MCP tools even though MCP tool names are
model-visible and stable
This change generalizes those hook paths so they can match and receive
payloads for MCP tools while preserving the existing Bash behavior.
## Reviewer Notes
I think these are the key files
- `codex-rs/core/src/tools/handlers/mcp.rs`
- `codex-rs/core/src/mcp_tool_call.rs`
Otherwise the changes across apply_patch, shell, and unified_exec are
mainly to rewire everything to be `tool_input` based instead of just
`command` so that it'll make sense for MCP tools.
## Changes
- Allow `PreToolUse`, `PostToolUse`, and `PermissionRequest` hook inputs
to carry arbitrary `tool_name` and `tool_input` values instead of
hard-coding `Bash` and command-only payloads.
- Add MCP hook payload support through `McpHandler`, using the
model-visible tool name from `ToolInvocation` and the raw MCP arguments
as `tool_input`.
- Include MCP tool responses in `PostToolUse` by serializing
`McpToolOutput` into the hook response payload.
- Run `PermissionRequest` hooks for MCP approval requests after
remembered approval checks and before falling back to user-facing MCP
elicitation.
- Preserve exact matching for literal hook matchers like `Bash` and
`mcp__memory__create_entities`, while keeping regex matcher support for
patterns like `mcp__memory__.*` and `mcp__.*__write.*`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrei Eternal <eternal@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Fixes#16246.
## Why
`exec_command` already emits `PreToolUse`, but long-running unified exec
commands that finish on a later `write_stdin` poll could miss the
matching `PostToolUse`. That left the Bash hook lifecycle inconsistent,
broke expectations around `tool_use_id` and `tool_input.command`, and
meant `PostToolUse` block/replacement feedback could fail to replace the
final session output before it reached model context.
This keeps the fix scoped to the `exec_command` / `write_stdin`
lifecycle. Broader non-Bash hook expansion is still out of scope here
and remains tracked separately in #16732.
## What changed
- Compute and store `PostToolUsePayload` while handlers still have
access to their concrete output type, and carry `tool_use_id` through
that payload.
- Preserve the original hook-facing `exec_command` string through
unified exec state (`ExecCommandRequest`, `ProcessEntry`,
`PreparedProcessHandles`, and `ExecCommandToolOutput`) via
`hook_command`, and remove the now-unused `session_command` output
metadata.
- Emit exactly one Bash `PostToolUse` for long-running `exec_command`
sessions when a later `write_stdin` poll observes final completion,
using the original `exec_command` call id and hook-facing command.
- Keep one-shot `exec_command` behavior aligned with the same payload
construction, including interactive completions that return a final
result directly.
- Apply `PostToolUse` block/replacement feedback before the final
`write_stdin` completion output is sent back to the model.
- Keep `write_stdin` itself out of `PreToolUse` matching so it continues
to act as transport/polling for the original Bash tool call.
- Restore plain matcher behavior for tool-name matchers such as `Bash`
and `Edit|Write`, while still treating patterns with regex characters
(for example `mcp__.*`) as regexes.
- Add unit coverage for unified exec payload construction and parallel
session separation, plus a core integration regression that verifies a
blocked `PostToolUse` replaces the final `write_stdin` output in model
context.
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-hooks`
- `cargo test -p codex-core post_tool_use_payload`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
post_tool_use_blocks_when_exec_session_completes_via_write_stdin`
Deferred dynamic tools need to round-trip a namespace so a tool returned
by `tool_search` can be called through the same registry key that core
uses for dispatch.
This change adds namespace support for dynamic tool specs/calls,
persists it through app-server thread state, and routes dynamic tool
calls by full `ToolName` while still sending the app the leaf tool name.
Deferred dynamic tools must provide a namespace; non-deferred dynamic
tools may remain top-level.
It also introduces `LoadableToolSpec` as the shared
function-or-namespace Responses shape used by both `tool_search` output
and dynamic tool registration, so dynamic tools use the same wrapping
logic in both paths.
Validation:
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tool_search`
---------
Co-authored-by: Sayan Sisodiya <sayan@openai.com>
## Summary
- honor `_meta["codex/imageDetail"] == "original"` on MCP image content
and map it to `detail: "original"` where supported
- strip that detail back out when the active model does not support
original-detail image inputs
- update code-mode `image(...)` to accept individual MCP image blocks
- teach `js_repl` / `codex.emitImage(...)` to preserve the same hint
from raw MCP image outputs
- document the new `_meta` contract and add generic RMCP-backed coverage
across protocol, core, code-mode, and js_repl paths
## Summary
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/13860 changed the serialized output
format of Unified Exec. This PR reverts those changes and some related
test changes
## Testing
- [x] Update tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Why
`codex-rs/core/src/client_common.rs` still had a `tools` re-export
module that forwarded `codex_tools` types back into `codex-core`. After
the earlier extraction work in #16379, #16471, #16477, and #16481, that
extra layer no longer adds value.
Removing it keeps dependencies explicit: the `codex-core` modules that
actually use `ToolSpec` and related types now depend on `codex_tools`
directly instead of reaching through `client_common`.
## What Changed
- removed the `client_common::tools` re-export module from
`core/src/client_common.rs`
- updated the remaining `codex-core` consumers to import `codex_tools`
directly
- adjusted the affected test code to reference
`codex_tools::ResponsesApiTool` directly as well
This is a mechanical cleanup only. It does not change tool behavior or
runtime logic.
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core client_common::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tools::router::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tools::context::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tools::spec::tests`
## Why
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/handlers/plan.rs` still owned both the
`update_plan` runtime handler and the static tool definition. The tool
definition is pure metadata, so keeping it in `codex-core` works against
the ongoing effort to move tool-spec code into `codex-tools` and keep
`codex-core` focused on orchestration and execution paths.
This continues the extraction work from #16379, #16471, and #16477.
## What Changed
- added `codex-rs/tools/src/plan_tool.rs` with
`create_update_plan_tool()`
- re-exported that constructor from `codex-rs/tools/src/lib.rs`
- updated `codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec.rs` and
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec_tests.rs` to use the `codex-tools` export
instead of a core-local static
- removed the old `PLAN_TOOL` definition from
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/handlers/plan.rs`; the `PlanHandler` runtime
logic still stays in `codex-core`
- tightened two `codex-core` aliases to `#[cfg(test)]` now that
production code no longer needs them
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tools::spec::tests`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/16481).
* #16482
* __->__ #16481
## Summary
- add `approvals_reviewer = "user" | "guardian_subagent"` as the runtime
control for who reviews approval requests
- route Smart Approvals guardian review through core for command
execution, file changes, managed-network approvals, MCP approvals, and
delegated/subagent approval flows
- expose guardian review in app-server with temporary unstable
`item/autoApprovalReview/{started,completed}` notifications carrying
`targetItemId`, `review`, and `action`
- update the TUI so Smart Approvals can be enabled from `/experimental`,
aligned with the matching `/approvals` mode, and surfaced clearly while
reviews are pending or resolved
## Runtime model
This PR does not introduce a new `approval_policy`.
Instead:
- `approval_policy` still controls when approval is needed
- `approvals_reviewer` controls who reviewable approval requests are
routed to:
- `user`
- `guardian_subagent`
`guardian_subagent` is a carefully prompted reviewer subagent that
gathers relevant context and applies a risk-based decision framework
before approving or denying the request.
The `smart_approvals` feature flag is a rollout/UI gate. Core runtime
behavior keys off `approvals_reviewer`.
When Smart Approvals is enabled from the TUI, it also switches the
current `/approvals` settings to the matching Smart Approvals mode so
users immediately see guardian review in the active thread:
- `approval_policy = on-request`
- `approvals_reviewer = guardian_subagent`
- `sandbox_mode = workspace-write`
Users can still change `/approvals` afterward.
Config-load behavior stays intentionally narrow:
- plain `smart_approvals = true` in `config.toml` remains just the
rollout/UI gate and does not auto-set `approvals_reviewer`
- the deprecated `guardian_approval = true` alias migration does
backfill `approvals_reviewer = "guardian_subagent"` in the same scope
when that reviewer is not already configured there, so old configs
preserve their original guardian-enabled behavior
ARC remains a separate safety check. For MCP tool approvals, ARC
escalations now flow into the configured reviewer instead of always
bypassing guardian and forcing manual review.
## Config stability
The runtime reviewer override is stable, but the config-backed
app-server protocol shape is still settling.
- `thread/start`, `thread/resume`, and `turn/start` keep stable
`approvalsReviewer` overrides
- the config-backed `approvals_reviewer` exposure returned via
`config/read` (including profile-level config) is now marked
`[UNSTABLE]` / experimental in the app-server protocol until we are more
confident in that config surface
## App-server surface
This PR intentionally keeps the guardian app-server shape narrow and
temporary.
It adds generic unstable lifecycle notifications:
- `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/completed`
with payloads of the form:
- `{ threadId, turnId, targetItemId, review, action? }`
`review` is currently:
- `{ status, riskScore?, riskLevel?, rationale? }`
- where `status` is one of `inProgress`, `approved`, `denied`, or
`aborted`
`action` carries the guardian action summary payload from core when
available. This lets clients render temporary standalone pending-review
UI, including parallel reviews, even when the underlying tool item has
not been emitted yet.
These notifications are explicitly documented as `[UNSTABLE]` and
expected to change soon.
This PR does **not** persist guardian review state onto `thread/read`
tool items. The intended follow-up is to attach guardian review state to
the reviewed tool item lifecycle instead, which would improve
consistency with manual approvals and allow thread history / reconnect
flows to replay guardian review state directly.
## TUI behavior
- `/experimental` exposes the rollout gate as `Smart Approvals`
- enabling it in the TUI enables the feature and switches the current
session to the matching Smart Approvals `/approvals` mode
- disabling it in the TUI clears the persisted `approvals_reviewer`
override when appropriate and returns the session to default manual
review when the effective reviewer changes
- `/approvals` still exposes the reviewer choice directly
- the TUI renders:
- pending guardian review state in the live status footer, including
parallel review aggregation
- resolved approval/denial state in history
## Scope notes
This PR includes the supporting core/runtime work needed to make Smart
Approvals usable end-to-end:
- shell / unified-exec / apply_patch / managed-network / MCP guardian
review
- delegated/subagent approval routing into guardian review
- guardian review risk metadata and action summaries for app-server/TUI
- config/profile/TUI handling for `smart_approvals`, `guardian_approval`
alias migration, and `approvals_reviewer`
- a small internal cleanup of delegated approval forwarding to dedupe
fallback paths and simplify guardian-vs-parent approval waiting (no
intended behavior change)
Out of scope for this PR:
- redesigning the existing manual approval protocol shapes
- persisting guardian review state onto app-server `ThreadItem`s
- delegated MCP elicitation auto-review (the current delegated MCP
guardian shim only covers the legacy `RequestUserInput` path)
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Why
PR #13783 moved the `codex.rs` unit tests into `codex_tests.rs`. This
applies the same extraction pattern across the rest of `codex-rs/core`
so the production modules stay focused on runtime code instead of large
inline test blocks.
Keeping the tests in sibling files also makes follow-up edits easier to
review because product changes no longer have to share a file with
hundreds or thousands of lines of test scaffolding.
## What changed
- replaced each inline `mod tests { ... }` in `codex-rs/core/src/**`
with a path-based module declaration
- moved each extracted unit test module into a sibling `*_tests.rs`
file, using `mod_tests.rs` for `mod.rs` modules
- preserved the existing `cfg(...)` guards and module-local structure so
the refactor remains structural rather than behavioral
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib` (`1653 passed; 0 failed; 5 ignored`)
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo fmt --check`
- `cargo shear`