mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
956f2f439ed2fc6a82e571adefe8dafdd7aaf7ed
11 Commits
-
test: vendor zsh fork via DotSlash and stabilize zsh-fork tests (#12518)
## Why The zsh integration tests were still brittle in two ways: - they relied on `CODEX_TEST_ZSH_PATH` / environment-specific setup, so they often did not exercise the patched zsh fork that `shell-tool-mcp` ships - once the tests consistently used the vendored zsh fork, they exposed real Linux-specific zsh-fork issues in CI In particular, the Linux failures were not just test noise: - the zsh-fork launch path was dropping `ExecRequest.arg0`, so Linux `codex-linux-sandbox` arg0 dispatch did not run and zsh wrapper-mode could receive malformed arguments - the `turn_start_shell_zsh_fork_subcommand_decline_marks_parent_declined_v2` test uses the zsh exec bridge (which talks to the parent over a Unix socket), but Linux restricted sandbox seccomp denies `connect(2)`, causing timeouts on `ubuntu-24.04` x86/arm This PR makes the zsh tests consistently run against the intended vendored zsh fork and fixes/hardens the zsh-fork path so the Linux CI signal is meaningful. ## What Changed - Added a single shared test-only DotSlash file for the patched zsh fork at `codex-rs/exec-server/tests/suite/zsh` (analogous to the existing `bash` test resource). - Updated both app-server and exec-server zsh tests to use that shared DotSlash zsh (no duplicate zsh DotSlash file, no `CODEX_TEST_ZSH_PATH` dependency). - Updated the app-server zsh-fork test helper to resolve the shared DotSlash zsh and avoid silently falling back to host zsh. - Kept the app-server zsh-fork tests configured via `config.toml`, using a test wrapper path where needed to force `zsh -df` (and rewrite `-lc` to `-c`) for the subcommand-decline test. - Hardened the app-server subcommand-decline zsh-fork test for CI variability: - tolerate an extra `/responses` POST with a no-op mock response - tolerate non-target approval ordering while remaining strict on the two `/usr/bin/true` approvals and decline behavior - use `DangerFullAccess` on Linux for this one test because it validates zsh approval flow, not Linux sandbox socket restrictions - Fixed zsh-fork process launching on Linux by preserving `req.arg0` in `ZshExecBridge::execute_shell_request(...)` so `codex-linux-sandbox` arg0 dispatch continues to work. - Moved `maybe_run_zsh_exec_wrapper_mode()` under `arg0_dispatch_or_else(...)` in `app-server` and `cli` so wrapper-mode handling coexists correctly with arg0-dispatched helper modes. - Consolidated duplicated `dotslash -- fetch` resolution logic into shared test support (`core/tests/common/lib.rs`). - Updated `codex-rs/exec-server/tests/suite/accept_elicitation.rs` to use DotSlash zsh and hardened the zsh elicitation test for Bazel/zsh differences by: - resolving an absolute `git` path - running `git init --quiet .` - asserting success / `.git` creation instead of relying on banner text ## Verification - `cargo test -p codex-app-server turn_start_zsh_fork -- --nocapture` - `cargo test -p codex-exec-server accept_elicitation -- --nocapture` - `bazel test //codex-rs/exec-server:exec-server-all-test --test_output=streamed --test_arg=--nocapture --test_arg=accept_elicitation_for_prompt_rule_with_zsh` - CI (`rust-ci`) on the final cleaned commit: `Tests — ubuntu-24.04 - x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `Tests — ubuntu-24.04-arm - aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` passed in [run 22291424358](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/22291424358)
Michael Bolin ·
2026-02-22 19:39:56 -08:00 -
chore: remove codex-core public protocol/shell re-exports (#12432)
## Why `codex-rs/core/src/lib.rs` re-exported a broad set of types and modules from `codex-protocol` and `codex-shell-command`. That made it easy for workspace crates to import those APIs through `codex-core`, which in turn hides dependency edges and makes it harder to reduce compile-time coupling over time. This change removes those public re-exports so call sites must import from the source crates directly. Even when a crate still depends on `codex-core` today, this makes dependency boundaries explicit and unblocks future work to drop `codex-core` dependencies where possible. ## What Changed - Removed public re-exports from `codex-rs/core/src/lib.rs` for: - `codex_protocol::protocol` and related protocol/model types (including `InitialHistory`) - `codex_protocol::config_types` (`protocol_config_types`) - `codex_shell_command::{bash, is_dangerous_command, is_safe_command, parse_command, powershell}` - Migrated workspace Rust call sites to import directly from: - `codex_protocol::protocol` - `codex_protocol::config_types` - `codex_protocol::models` - `codex_shell_command` - Added explicit `Cargo.toml` dependencies (`codex-protocol` / `codex-shell-command`) in crates that now import those crates directly. - Kept `codex-core` internal modules compiling by using `pub(crate)` aliases in `core/src/lib.rs` (internal-only, not part of the public API). - Updated the two utility crates that can already drop a `codex-core` dependency edge entirely: - `codex-utils-approval-presets` - `codex-utils-cli` ## Verification - `cargo test -p codex-utils-approval-presets` - `cargo test -p codex-utils-cli` - `cargo check --workspace --all-targets` - `just clippy`Michael Bolin ·
2026-02-20 23:45:35 -08:00 -
feat: introduce codex-utils-cargo-bin as an alternative to assert_cmd::Command (#8496)
This PR introduces a `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility crate that wraps/replaces our use of `assert_cmd::Command` and `escargot::CargoBuild`. As you can infer from the introduction of `buck_project_root()` in this PR, I am attempting to make it possible to build Codex under [Buck2](https://buck2.build) as well as `cargo`. With Buck2, I hope to achieve faster incremental local builds (largely due to Buck2's [dice](https://buck2.build/docs/insights_and_knowledge/modern_dice/) build strategy, as well as benefits from its local build daemon) as well as faster CI builds if we invest in remote execution and caching. See https://buck2.build/docs/getting_started/what_is_buck2/#why-use-buck2-key-advantages for more details about the performance advantages of Buck2. Buck2 enforces stronger requirements in terms of build and test isolation. It discourages assumptions about absolute paths (which is key to enabling remote execution). Because the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment variables that Cargo provides are absolute paths (which `assert_cmd::Command` reads), this is a problem for Buck2, which is why we need this `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility. My WIP-Buck2 setup sets the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment variables passed to a `rust_test()` build rule as relative paths. `codex-utils-cargo-bin` will resolve these values to absolute paths, when necessary. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/8496). * #8498 * __->__ #8496
Michael Bolin ·
2025-12-23 19:29:32 -08:00 -
Eric Traut ·
2025-12-15 16:23:04 -08:00 -
fix: add integration tests for codex-exec-mcp-server with execpolicy (#7617)
This PR introduces integration tests that run [codex-shell-tool-mcp](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openai/codex-shell-tool-mcp) as a user would. Note that this requires running our fork of Bash, so we introduce a [DotSlash](https://dotslash-cli.com/) file for `bash` so that we can run the integration tests on multiple platforms without having to check the binaries into the repository. (As noted in the DotSlash file, it is slightly more heavyweight than necessary, which may be worth addressing as disk space in CI is limited: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/7678.) To start, this PR adds two tests: - `list_tools()` makes the `list_tools` request to the MCP server and verifies we get the expected response - `accept_elicitation_for_prompt_rule()` defines a `prefix_rule()` with `decision="prompt"` and verifies the elicitation flow works as expected Though the `accept_elicitation_for_prompt_rule()` test **only works on Linux**, as this PR reveals that there are currently issues when running the Bash fork in a read-only sandbox on Linux. This will have to be fixed in a follow-up PR. Incidentally, getting this test run to correctly on macOS also requires a recent fix we made to `brew` that hasn't hit a mainline release yet, so getting CI green in this PR required https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/7680.
Michael Bolin ·
2025-12-07 06:39:38 +00:00 -
feat: exec policy integration in shell mcp (#7609)
adding execpolicy support into the `posix` mcp Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
zhao-oai ·
2025-12-04 21:55:54 -08:00 -
chore: add cargo-deny configuration (#7119)
- add GitHub workflow running cargo-deny on push/PR - document cargo-deny allowlist with workspace-dep notes and advisory ignores - align workspace crates to inherit version/edition/license for consistent checks
Josh McKinney ·
2025-11-24 12:22:18 -08:00 -
feat: waiting for an elicitation should not count against a shell tool timeout (#6973)
Previously, we were running into an issue where we would run the `shell` tool call with a timeout of 10s, but it fired an elicitation asking for user approval, the time the user took to respond to the elicitation was counted agains the 10s timeout, so the `shell` tool call would fail with a timeout error unless the user is very fast! This PR addresses this issue by introducing a "stopwatch" abstraction that is used to manage the timeout. The idea is: - `Stopwatch::new()` is called with the _real_ timeout of the `shell` tool call. - `process_exec_tool_call()` is called with the `Cancellation` variant of `ExecExpiration` because it should not manage its own timeout in this case - the `Stopwatch` expiration is wired up to the `cancel_rx` passed to `process_exec_tool_call()` - when an elicitation for the `shell` tool call is received, the `Stopwatch` pauses - because it is possible for multiple elicitations to arrive concurrently, it keeps track of the number of "active pauses" and does not resume until that counter goes down to zero I verified that I can test the MCP server using `@modelcontextprotocol/inspector` and specify `git status` as the `command` with a timeout of 500ms and that the elicitation pops up and I have all the time in the world to respond whereas previous to this PR, that would not have been possible. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/6973). * #7005 * __->__ #6973 * #6972
Michael Bolin ·
2025-11-20 16:45:38 -08:00 -
chore: refactor exec-server to prepare it for standalone MCP use (#6944)
This PR reorganizes things slightly so that: - Instead of a single multitool executable, `codex-exec-server`, we now have two executables: - `codex-exec-mcp-server` to launch the MCP server - `codex-execve-wrapper` is the `execve(2)` wrapper to use with the `BASH_EXEC_WRAPPER` environment variable - `BASH_EXEC_WRAPPER` must be a single executable: it cannot be a command string composed of an executable with args (i.e., it no longer adds the `escalate` subcommand, as before) - `codex-exec-mcp-server` takes `--bash` and `--execve` as options. Though if `--execve` is not specified, the MCP server will check the directory containing `std::env::current_exe()` and attempt to use the file named `codex-execve-wrapper` within it. In development, this works out since these executables are side-by-side in the `target/debug` folder. With respect to testing, this also fixes an important bug in `dummy_exec_policy()`, as I was using `ends_with()` as if it applied to a `String`, but in this case, it is used with a `&Path`, so the semantics are slightly different. Putting this all together, I was able to test this by running the following: ``` ~/code/codex/codex-rs$ npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector \ ./target/debug/codex-exec-mcp-server --bash ~/code/bash/bash ``` If I try to run `git status` in `/Users/mbolin/code/codex` via the `shell` tool from the MCP server: <img width="1589" height="1335" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9db6aea8-7fbc-4675-8b1f-ec446685d6c4" /> then I get prompted with the following elicitation, as expected: <img width="1589" height="1335" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21b68fe0-494d-4562-9bad-0ddc55fc846d" /> Though a current limitation is that the `shell` tool defaults to a timeout of 10s, which means I only have 10s to respond to the elicitation. Ideally, the time spent waiting for a response from a human should not count against the timeout for the command execution. I will address this in a subsequent PR. --- Note `~/code/bash/bash` was created by doing: ``` cd ~/code git clone https://github.com/bminor/bash cd bash git checkout a8a1c2fac029404d3f42cd39f5a20f24b6e4fe4b <apply the patch below> ./configure make ``` The patch: ``` diff --git a/execute_cmd.c b/execute_cmd.c index 070f5119..d20ad2b9 100644 --- a/execute_cmd.c +++ b/execute_cmd.c @@ -6129,6 +6129,19 @@ shell_execve (char *command, char **args, char **env) char sample[HASH_BANG_BUFSIZ]; size_t larray; + char* exec_wrapper = getenv("BASH_EXEC_WRAPPER"); + if (exec_wrapper && *exec_wrapper && !whitespace (*exec_wrapper)) + { + char *orig_command = command; + + larray = strvec_len (args); + + memmove (args + 2, args, (++larray) * sizeof (char *)); + args[0] = exec_wrapper; + args[1] = orig_command; + command = exec_wrapper; + } + ```Michael Bolin ·
2025-11-19 16:38:14 -08:00 -
fix: prepare ExecPolicy in exec-server for execpolicy2 cutover (#6888)
This PR introduces an extra layer of abstraction to prepare us for the migration to execpolicy2: - introduces a new trait, `EscalationPolicy`, whose `determine_action()` method is responsible for producing the `EscalateAction` - the existing `ExecPolicy` typedef is changed to return an intermediate `ExecPolicyOutcome` instead of `EscalateAction` - the default implementation of `EscalationPolicy`, `McpEscalationPolicy`, composes `ExecPolicy` - the `ExecPolicyOutcome` includes `codex_execpolicy2::Decision`, which has a `Prompt` variant - when `McpEscalationPolicy` gets `Decision::Prompt` back from `ExecPolicy`, it prompts the user via an MCP elicitation and maps the result into an `ElicitationAction` - now that the end user can reply to an elicitation with `Decline` or `Cancel`, we introduce a new variant, `EscalateAction::Deny`, which the client handles by returning exit code `1` without running anything Note the way the elicitation is created is still not quite right, but I will fix that once we have things running end-to-end for real in a follow-up PR.
Michael Bolin ·
2025-11-19 13:55:29 -08:00 -
Jeremy Rose ·
2025-11-19 00:20:19 +00:00