## Why
Multi-agent v2 currently routes agent instructions through normal tool
arguments and inter-agent context. That means the parent model can emit
plaintext task text, Codex can persist it in history/rollouts, and the
recipient can receive it as ordinary assistant-message JSON.
This changes the v2 path so agent instructions stay encrypted between
model calls: Responses encrypts the `message` argument returned by the
model, Codex forwards only that ciphertext, and Responses decrypts it
internally for the recipient model.
## What changed
- Mark the v2 `message` parameter as encrypted for `spawn_agent`,
`send_message`, and `followup_task`.
- Treat multi-agent v2 tool `message` values as ciphertext
unconditionally.
- Store v2 inter-agent task text in
`InterAgentCommunication.encrypted_content` with empty plaintext
`content`.
- Convert encrypted inter-agent communications into the Responses
`agent_message` input item before sending the child request.
- Preserve `agent_message` items across history, rollout, compaction,
telemetry, and app-server schema paths.
- Leave multi-agent v1 unchanged.
## Message shape
The model still calls the v2 tools with a `message` argument, but that
value is now ciphertext:
```json
{
"name": "spawn_agent",
"arguments": {
"task_name": "worker",
"message": "<ciphertext>"
}
}
```
Codex stores the task as encrypted inter-agent communication:
```json
{
"author": "/root",
"recipient": "/root/worker",
"content": "",
"encrypted_content": "<ciphertext>",
"trigger_turn": true
}
```
When Codex builds the recipient request, it forwards the ciphertext
using the new Responses input item:
```json
{
"type": "agent_message",
"author": "/root",
"recipient": "/root/worker",
"content": [
{
"type": "encrypted_content",
"encrypted_content": "<ciphertext>"
}
]
}
```
Responses decrypts that item internally for the recipient model.
## Context impact
- Parent context no longer carries plaintext v2 agent task instructions
from these tool arguments.
- Codex rollout/history stores ciphertext for v2 agent instructions.
- Recipient requests receive an `agent_message` item instead of
assistant commentary JSON for encrypted task delivery.
- Plaintext completion/status notifications are still plaintext because
they are Codex-generated status messages, not encrypted model tool
arguments.
## Validation
- `just test -p codex-tools`
- `just test -p codex-protocol`
- `just test -p codex-rollout`
- `just test -p codex-rollout-trace`
- `just test -p codex-otel`
- `just write-app-server-schema`
## Why
This adds the `remote_compaction_v2` client path so remote compaction
can run through the normal Responses stream and install a
`context_compaction` item that trigger a compaction.
The goal is to migrate some of the compaction logic on the client side
We keeps the v2 transport behind a feature flag while letting follow-up
requests reuse the compacted context instead of falling back to the
legacy compaction item shape.
## What changed
- add `ResponseItem::ContextCompaction` and refresh the generated
app-server / schema / TypeScript fixtures that expose response items on
the wire
- add `core/src/compact_remote_v2.rs` to send compaction through the
standard streamed Responses client, require exactly one
`context_compaction` output item, and install that item into compacted
history
- route manual compact and auto-compaction through the v2 path when
`remote_compaction_v2` is enabled, while keeping the existing remote
compaction path as the fallback
- preserve the new item type across history retention, follow-up request
construction, telemetry, rollout persistence, and rollout-trace
normalization
- add targeted coverage for the feature flag, `context_compaction`
serialization, rollout-trace normalization, and remote-compaction
follow-up behavior
## Verification
- added protocol tests for `context_compaction`
serialization/deserialization in `protocol/src/models.rs`
- added rollout-trace coverage for `context_compaction` normalization in
`rollout-trace/src/reducer/conversation_tests.rs`
- added remote compaction integration coverage for v2 follow-up reuse
and mixed compaction output streams in
`core/tests/suite/compact_remote.rs`
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
In some setups the summary or raw content can be dropped between
requests. This triggers a check in the reducer which expects that the
messages should remain identical between requests.
This PR relaxes the checks to only focus on the encrypted ID instead. It
also changes the reducer to keep the most rich version of the message
observed during the rollout (this ensures that we don't accidentally
lose the CoT nor summary when available).
## Why
Rollout traces need an identifier that can be used to correlate a Codex
inference with upstream Responses API, proxy, and engine logs. The
reduced trace model already exposed `upstream_request_id`, but it was
being populated from the Responses API `response.id`. That value is
useful for `previous_response_id` chaining, but it is not the transport
request id that upstream systems key on.
This PR separates those concepts so trace consumers can reliably answer
both questions:
- which Responses API response did this inference produce?
- which upstream request handled it?
## Structure
The change keeps the upstream request id at the same lifecycle level as
the provider stream:
- `codex-api` captures the `x-request-id` HTTP response header when the
SSE stream is created and exposes it on `ResponseStream`. Fixture and
websocket streams set the field to `None` because they do not have that
HTTP response header.
- `codex-core` carries that stream-level id into `InferenceTraceAttempt`
when recording terminal stream outcomes. Completed, failed, cancelled,
dropped-stream, and pre-response error paths all record the id when it
is available.
- `rollout-trace` now records both identifiers in raw terminal inference
events and response payloads: `response_id` for the Responses API
`response.id`, and `upstream_request_id` for `x-request-id`.
- The reducer stores both fields on `InferenceCall`. It also uses
`response_id` for `previous_response_id` conversation linking, which
removes the old accidental dependency on the misnamed
`upstream_request_id` field.
- Terminal inference reduction now consumes the full terminal payload
(`InferenceCompleted`, `InferenceFailed`, or `InferenceCancelled`) in
one place. That keeps status, partial payloads, response ids, and
upstream request ids consistent across success, failure, cancellation,
and late stream-mapper events.
## Why This Shape
`x-request-id` is a property of the HTTP/provider response envelope, not
an SSE event. Capturing it once in `codex-api` and plumbing it through
terminal trace recording avoids trying to infer the value from stream
contents, and it preserves the id even when the stream fails or is
cancelled after only partial output.
Keeping `response_id` separate from `upstream_request_id` also makes the
reduced trace model less surprising: `response_id` remains the
conversation-continuation id, while `upstream_request_id` is the
operational correlation id for upstream debugging.
## Validation
The PR updates trace and reducer coverage for:
- reading `x-request-id` from SSE response headers;
- storing the true upstream request id on completed inference calls;
- preserving upstream request ids for cancelled and late-cancelled
inference streams;
- keeping `previous_response_id` reconstruction tied to `response_id`
rather than transport request ids.
Records cancelled inference streams when Codex stops consuming a
provider response before `response.completed`, preserving complete
output items observed before cancellation.
Also closes still-running inference calls when the owning turn ends, so
reduced rollout traces do not leave stale `Running` inference nodes.
Covered by focused reducer coverage and a core stream-drop test for
partial output preservation.
## Summary
Adds the standalone `codex-rollout-trace` crate, which defines the raw
trace event format, replay/reduction model, writer, and reducer logic
for reconstructing model-visible conversation/runtime state from
recorded rollout data.
The crate-level design is documented in
[`codex-rs/rollout-trace/README.md`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/codex/rollout-trace-crate/codex-rs/rollout-trace/README.md).
## Stack
This is PR 1/5 in the rollout trace stack.
- [#18876](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18876): Add rollout
trace crate
- [#18877](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18877): Record core
session rollout traces
- [#18878](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18878): Trace tool and
code-mode boundaries
- [#18879](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18879): Trace sessions
and multi-agent edges
- [#18880](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18880): Add debug trace
reduction command
## Review Notes
This PR intentionally does not wire tracing into live Codex execution.
It establishes the data model and reducer contract first, with
crate-local tests covering conversation reconstruction, compaction
boundaries, tool/session edges, and code-cell lifecycle reduction. Later
PRs emit into this model.
The README is the best entry point for reviewing the intended trace
format and reduction semantics before diving into the reducer modules.
jifandGitHub
cassirer-openaiandGitHub
