codex

Add compact lifecycle hooks (started by vincentkoc - external contrib) (#19905 )

Based on work from Vincent K -
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/19060

<img width="1836" height="642" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-29 at 20 47 40@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b647bb89-65fe-40c8-80b0-7a6b7c984634"
/>

## Why

Compaction rewrites the conversation context that future model turns
receive, but hooks currently have no deterministic lifecycle point
around that rewrite. This adds compact lifecycle hooks so users can
audit manual and automatic compaction, surface hook messages in the UI,
and run post-compaction follow-up without overloading tool or prompt
hooks.

## What Changed

- Added `PreCompact` and `PostCompact` hook events across hook config,
discovery, dispatch, generated schemas, app-server notifications,
analytics, and TUI hook rendering.
- Added trigger matching for compact hooks with the documented `manual`
and `auto` matcher values.
- Wired `PreCompact` before both local and remote compaction, and
`PostCompact` after successful local or remote compaction.
- Kept compact hook command input to lifecycle metadata: session id,
Codex turn id, transcript path, cwd, hook event name, model, and
trigger.
- Made compact stdout handling consistent with other hooks: plain stdout
is ignored as debug output, while malformed JSON-looking stdout is
reported as failed hook output.
- Added integration coverage for compact hook dispatch, trigger
matching, post-compact execution, and the audited behavior that
`decision:"block"` does not block compaction.

## Out of Scope

- Hook-specific compaction blocking is not implemented;
`decision:"block"` and exit-code-2 blocking semantics are intentionally
unsupported for `PreCompact`.
- Custom compaction instructions are not exposed to compact hooks in
this PR.
- Compact summaries, summary character counts, and summary previews are
not exposed to compact hooks in this PR.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-hooks`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
manual_pre_compact_block_decision_does_not_block_compaction`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server hooks_list`
- `cargo test -p codex-core config_schema_matches_fixture`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui hooks_browser`

## Docs

The developer documentation for Codex hooks should be updated alongside
this feature to document `PreCompact` and `PostCompact`, the
`manual`/`auto` matcher values, and the compact hook payload fields.

---------

Co-authored-by: Vincent Koc <vincentkoc@ieee.org>

Andrei Eternal · 2026-05-06 18:08:31 -07:00

527d52df03

Add PermissionRequest hooks support (#17563 )

## Why

We need `PermissionRequest` hook support!

Also addresses:
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/16301
- run a script on Hook to do things like play a sound to draw attention
but actually no-op so user can still approve
- can omit the `decision` object from output or just have the script
exit 0 and print nothing
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/15311
  - let the script approve/deny on its own
  - external UI what will run on Hook and relay decision back to codex


## Reviewer Note

There's a lot of plumbing for the new hook, key files to review are:
- New hook added in `codex-rs/hooks/src/events/permission_request.rs`
- Wiring for network approvals
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/network_approval.rs`
- Wiring for tool orchestrator `codex-rs/core/src/tools/orchestrator.rs`
- Wiring for execve
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs`

## What

- Wires shell, unified exec, and network approval prompts into the
`PermissionRequest` hook flow.
- Lets hooks allow or deny approval prompts; quiet or invalid hooks fall
back to the normal approval path.
- Uses `tool_input.description` for user-facing context when it helps:
  - shell / `exec_command`: the request justification, when present
  - network approvals: `network-access <domain>`
- Uses `tool_name: Bash` for shell, unified exec, and network approval
permission-request hooks.
- For network approvals, passes the originating command in
`tool_input.command` when there is a single owning call; otherwise falls
back to the synthetic `network-access ...` command.

<details>
<summary>Example `PermissionRequest` hook input for a shell
approval</summary>

```json
{
  "session_id": "<session-id>",
  "turn_id": "<turn-id>",
  "transcript_path": "/path/to/transcript.jsonl",
  "cwd": "/path/to/cwd",
  "hook_event_name": "PermissionRequest",
  "model": "gpt-5",
  "permission_mode": "default",
  "tool_name": "Bash",
  "tool_input": {
    "command": "rm -f /tmp/example"
  }
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Example `PermissionRequest` hook input for an escalated
`exec_command` request</summary>

```json
{
  "session_id": "<session-id>",
  "turn_id": "<turn-id>",
  "transcript_path": "/path/to/transcript.jsonl",
  "cwd": "/path/to/cwd",
  "hook_event_name": "PermissionRequest",
  "model": "gpt-5",
  "permission_mode": "default",
  "tool_name": "Bash",
  "tool_input": {
    "command": "cp /tmp/source.json /Users/alice/export/source.json",
    "description": "Need to copy a generated file outside the workspace"
  }
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Example `PermissionRequest` hook input for a network
approval</summary>

```json
{
  "session_id": "<session-id>",
  "turn_id": "<turn-id>",
  "transcript_path": "/path/to/transcript.jsonl",
  "cwd": "/path/to/cwd",
  "hook_event_name": "PermissionRequest",
  "model": "gpt-5",
  "permission_mode": "default",
  "tool_name": "Bash",
  "tool_input": {
    "command": "curl http://codex-network-test.invalid",
    "description": "network-access http://codex-network-test.invalid"
  }
}
```

</details>

## Follow-ups

- Implement the `PermissionRequest` semantics for `updatedInput`,
`updatedPermissions`, `interrupt`, and suggestions /
`permission_suggestions`
- Add `PermissionRequest` support for the `request_permissions` tool
path

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>

Abhinav · 2026-04-17 14:45:47 +00:00

8494e5bd7b

[hooks] add non-streaming (non-stdin style) shell-only PostToolUse support (#15531 )

CHAINED PR - note that base is eternal/hooks-pretooluse-bash, not main
-- so the following PR should be first

Matching post-tool hook to the pre-tool functionality here:
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/15211

So, PreToolUse calls for plain shell calls, allows blocking. This
PostToolUse call runs after the command executed

example run:

```
› as a test, run in parallel the following commands:
- echo 'one'
- echo '[block-pre-tool-use]'
- echo '[block-post-tool-use]'

⚠ MCP startup incomplete (failed: notion, linear)

• Cruising through those three commands in parallel now, and I’ll share the exact outputs right after
they land.

• Running PreToolUse hook: checking the observatory runes

PreToolUse hook (blocked)
warning: wizard-tower PreToolUse demo blocked a Bash command on purpose.
feedback: PreToolUse demo blocked the command. Remove [block-pre-tool-use] to continue.

PreToolUse hook (completed)
warning: wizard-tower PreToolUse demo inspected Bash: echo 'one'

PreToolUse hook (completed)
warning: wizard-tower PreToolUse demo inspected Bash: echo '[block-post-tool-use]'

• Ran echo '[block-post-tool-use]'
└ [block-post-tool-use]

• Ran echo 'one'
└ one

• Running PostToolUse hook: reading the observatory aftermath

PostToolUse hook (blocked)
warning: wizard-tower PostToolUse demo blocked the Bash follow-through on purpose.
feedback: PostToolUse demo blocked the result after execution. Remove [block-post-tool-use] to
continue.

PostToolUse hook (completed)
warning: wizard-tower PostToolUse demo inspected Bash: echo 'one'
hook context: PostToolUse demo saw the Bash result. Response preview: one

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

• Ran them in parallel. Little wave report:

- echo 'one' completed and returned one.
- echo '[block-pre-tool-use]' was blocked before execution by the PreToolUse hook.
- echo '[block-post-tool-use]' ran, but its result was blocked afterward by the PostToolUse hook.

The hook messages were:

- PreToolUse demo blocked the command. Remove [block-pre-tool-use] to continue.
- PostToolUse demo blocked the result after execution. Remove [block-post-tool-use] to continue.

› for the blocked messages (correctly blocked in this test) did the tool output land back into
context?

• Yeah, from this run:

- PreToolUse block: the command itself did not execute, so no command output landed in context. Only
the block message did.
- PostToolUse block: the command did execute, but the actual stdout did not come back into context.
Only the post-tool block message did.

So the blocked notifications landed in context, but the blocked command payloads themselves did not.
Nice clean guardrail, aloha.
```

Andrei Eternal · 2026-03-25 19:18:03 -07:00

c4d9887f9a

3 Commits