## Why
`codex sandbox` accepts a single named permissions profile, so the
existing plural `--permissions-profile` spelling is misleading. The
canonical flag and its help text should use the singular form without
breaking scripts that already use the old spelling.
## What changed
- Make `--permission-profile` the canonical flag for all sandbox
backends.
- Keep `--permissions-profile` as a hidden backwards-compatible alias.
- Cover the canonical spelling, legacy alias, and help visibility with
regression tests.
## Testing
Ran `just c sandbox --help` and verified I saw:
```shell
-P, --permission-profile <NAME>
Named permissions profile to apply from the active configuration stack
```
## Why
`codex sandbox` can start a network proxy from a configured permission
profile. Previously, sandbox-level containment was tied to managed
network requirements rather than whether a proxy was actually active.
This meant config-driven proxy policies were not consistently enforced
as the sandbox's only network path.
## What changed
- Enable proxy-only network containment whenever `codex sandbox` starts
a network proxy.
- Apply the same active-proxy check to the macOS and Linux sandbox
paths.
- Add a Linux regression test that verifies a sandboxed command cannot
establish a direct connection while the configured proxy is active.
## Test plan
- `just test -p codex-cli debug_sandbox::tests`
- `sandbox_with_network_proxy_blocks_direct_loopback_access` runs on
Linux to cover the config-driven proxy path end to end.
Michael BolinandGitHub
viyatb-oaiandGitHub