mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
43fa4e5d259b045e190f1574be86377cfdbd78db
11 Commits
-
Uprev Rust toolchain pins to 1.95.0 (#24684)
## Summary - Bump the workspace Rust toolchain from `1.93.0` to `1.95.0` across Cargo, Bazel, CI, release workflows, devcontainers, and the Codex environment config. - Refresh `MODULE.bazel.lock` so the Bazel Rust toolchain artifacts match the new version. - Leave purpose-specific toolchains unchanged, including the `argument-comment-lint` nightly and the upstream `rusty_v8` `1.91.0` build pin. - Includes fixes for new lints from `just fix` and a few codex-authored fixes for lints without a suggestion.
Adam Perry @ OpenAI 路
2026-05-26 20:59:47 -07:00 -
CI: Customize v8 building (#22086)
## Summary Move the rusty_v8 artifact production into hermetic Bazel path and bump the `v8` crate to `147.4.0` The new flow builds V8 release artifacts from source for Darwin and Linux targets, publishes both the current release-compatible artifacts and sandbox-enabled variants, and keeps Cargo consumers on prebuilt binaries by continuing to feed the `v8` crate the archive and generated binding files it already expects. ## Why We need control over V8 build-time features without giving up prebuilt artifacts for downstream Cargo builds. Upstream `rusty_v8` already supports source-only features such as `v8_enable_sandbox`, but its normal prebuilt release assets do not cover every feature combination we need. Building the artifacts ourselves lets us enable settings such as the V8 sandbox and pointer compression at artifact build time, then publish those outputs so ordinary Cargo builds can still consume prebuilts instead of compiling V8 locally. This keeps the fast consumer experience of prebuilt `rusty_v8` archives while giving us a reproducible path to ship featureful variants that upstream does not currently publish for us. ## Implementation Notes The Bazel graph in this PR is not copied wholesale from `rusty_v8`; `rusty_v8`'s normal source build is still GN/Ninja-based. Instead, this change starts from upstream V8's Bazel rules and adapts them to Codex's hermetic toolchains and dependency layout. Where we intentionally follow `rusty_v8`, we mirror its existing artifact contract: - the same `v8` crate version and generated binding expectations - the same sandbox feature relationship, where sandboxing requires pointer compression - the same custom libc++ model expected by Cargo's default `use_custom_libcxx` feature - the same release-style archive plus `src_binding` outputs consumed by the `v8` crate To preserve that contract, the Bazel release path pins the libc++, libc++abi, and llvm-libc revisions used by `rusty_v8 v147.4.0`, builds release artifacts with `--config=rusty-v8-upstream-libcxx`, and folds the matching runtime objects into the final static archive. ## Windows Windows is annoyingly handled differently. Codex's current hermetic Bazel Windows C++ platform is `windows-gnullvm` / `x86_64-w64-windows-gnu`, while upstream `rusty_v8` publishes Windows prebuilts for `*-pc-windows-msvc`. Those are different ABIs, so the Bazel graph cannot truthfully reproduce the upstream MSVC artifacts until we add a real MSVC-targeting C++ toolchain. For now: - Windows MSVC consumers continue to use upstream `rusty_v8` release archives. - Windows GNU targets are built in-tree so they link against a matching GNU ABI. - The canary workflow separately exercises upstream `rusty_v8` source builds for MSVC sandbox artifacts, but MSVC is not yet part of the Bazel-produced release matrix. ## Validation This PR is technically self validating through CI. I have already published it as a release tag so the artifacts from this branch are published to https://github.com/openai/codex/releases/tag/rusty-v8-v147.4.0 CI for this PR should therefore consume our own release targets. I have also locally tested for linux and darwin. --------- Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Channing Conger 路
2026-05-18 21:33:05 -07:00 -
ci: check out PR head commits in workflows (#21835)
## Why PR CI should test the exact commit that was pushed to the PR branch. By default, GitHub's `pull_request` event checks out a synthetic merge commit from `refs/pull/<number>/merge`, so the tested tree can include an implicit merge with the current base branch instead of matching the pushed head SHA. Using the PR head SHA makes each check result correspond to a concrete commit the author submitted. This also behaves better for stacked PR workflows, including Sapling stacks and other Git stack tooling: a middle PR's head commit already contains the lower stack changes in its tree, without pulling in commits above it or GitHub's temporary merge ref. ## What Changed - Set every `actions/checkout` in `pull_request` workflows under `.github/workflows` to use `github.event.pull_request.head.sha` on PR events and `github.sha` otherwise. - Updated `blob-size-policy` to compare `github.event.pull_request.base.sha` and `github.event.pull_request.head.sha`, since it no longer checks out GitHub's merge commit where `HEAD^1`/`HEAD^2` represented the PR range. ## Verification - Parsed the edited workflow YAML files with Ruby. - Checked that every checkout block in the `pull_request` workflows has the PR-head `ref`.
Michael Bolin 路
2026-05-08 15:14:33 -07:00 -
[codex] Address some more GHA hygiene issues (#21622)
This does two things: - We use `persist-credentials: false` everywhere now. This is unfortunately not the default in GitHub Actions, but it prevents `actions/checkout` from dropping `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN` onto disk. - We interpose (some) template expansions through environment variables. I've limited this to contexts that have non-fixed values; contexts that are fixed (like `*.result`) are not dangerous to expand directly inline (but maybe we should clean those up in the future for consistency anyways). This is a medium-risk change in terms of CI breakage: I did a scan for usage of `git push` and other commands that implicitly use the persisted credential, but couldn't find any. Even still, some implicit usages of the persisted credentials may be lurking. Please ping ww@ if any issues arise.
William Woodruff 路
2026-05-08 10:19:27 -07:00 -
[codex] Fully qualify hash-pins in GitHub Actions (#21436)
This builds on top of https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/15828 by ensuring that hash-pinned actions with version comments are fully qualified, rather than referencing floating/mutable comments like "v7". This makes actions management tools behave more consistently. This shouldn't break anything, since it's comment only. But if it does, ping ww@ 馃檪
William Woodruff 路
2026-05-07 14:31:20 -07:00 -
Enable V8 sandboxing for source-built builds (#21146)
## Summary This is the first PR in the V8 in-process sandboxing rollout. It adds the build-system and Rust feature plumbing needed to support sandboxed V8 builds, then enables sandboxing by default for the source-built Bazel V8 path that we control directly. It deliberately keeps the published `rusty_v8` artifact workflows on their current non-sandboxed contract so this PR can land and ship independently before we change any released artifacts. ## Rollout plan - [x] **PR 1: land sandbox plumbing and default source-built Bazel V8 to sandboxed mode** - [ ] **PR 2: publish sandbox-enabled release artifacts and add compatibility validation** - Produce sandboxed artifact pairs for every released Cargo target that does not already use the source-built Bazel path. - Add CI coverage that consumes those sandboxed artifacts and verifies: - `codex-v8-poc` reports sandbox enabled - `codex-code-mode` builds/tests against the sandboxed path - [ ] **PR 3: switch release consumers to sandboxed artifacts by default** - Update released artifact selectors/checksums. - Enable the Rust `v8_enable_sandbox` feature in the default release path. - Make the sandboxed artifact family the normal path for published builds. - [ ] **PR 4: remove rollout-only compatibility paths** - Remove the temporary non-sandbox release compatibility config once the new default has shipped and baked. - Keep the invariant tests permanently.Channing Conger 路
2026-05-05 14:36:37 -07:00 -
ci: migrate Bazel setup away from archived setup-bazelisk (#19851)
## Why All Bazel CI jobs are currently blocked in the `setup-bazelisk` step while trying to download Bazelisk. [`bazelbuild/setup-bazelisk`](https://github.com/bazelbuild/setup-bazelisk) is archived, and its README now recommends migrating to [`bazel-contrib/setup-bazel`](https://github.com/bazel-contrib/setup-bazel), so leaving our workflows on the archived action leaves CI exposed to exactly this sort of outage. Because `v8-canary` now consumes the shared local `setup-bazel-ci` action, that workflow also needs to trigger when the action changes. Without that follow-up, Bazel bootstrap regressions specific to the V8 canary path could be skipped by the workflow path filters. ## What Changed - Switched `.github/actions/setup-bazel-ci/action.yml` from `bazelbuild/setup-bazelisk` to `bazel-contrib/setup-bazel`, pinned to `0.19.0`. - Left `bazelisk-version` unset so GitHub-hosted runners can use their preinstalled Bazelisk instead of downloading `1.x` at job start. - Updated `.github/workflows/rusty-v8-release.yml` and `.github/workflows/v8-canary.yml` to use the shared `setup-bazel-ci` action instead of referencing `setup-bazelisk` directly. - Added `.github/actions/setup-bazel-ci/**` to the `pull_request` and `push` path filters in `.github/workflows/v8-canary.yml` so changes to the shared Bazel setup action still run the canary workflow. - Kept the existing repository-cache and Windows-specific Bazel setup logic intact. This keeps Bazel version selection anchored by `.bazelversion` while removing the failing dependency on the archived setup action. ## Verification - Searched `.github/` to confirm there are no remaining `setup-bazelisk` references. - Parsed the updated workflow and action YAML locally with Ruby's `YAML.load_file`.
Michael Bolin 路
2026-04-27 11:37:30 -07:00 -
fix: pin inputs (#17471)
## Summary - Pin Rust git patch dependencies to immutable revisions and make cargo-deny reject unknown git and registry sources unless explicitly allowlisted. - Add checked-in SHA-256 coverage for the current rusty_v8 release assets, wire those hashes into Bazel, and verify CI override downloads before use. - Add rusty_v8 MODULE.bazel update/check tooling plus a Bazel CI guard so future V8 bumps cannot drift from the checked-in checksum manifest. - Pin release/lint cargo installs and all external GitHub Actions refs to immutable inputs. ## Future V8 bump flow Run these after updating the resolved `v8` crate version and checksum manifest: ```bash python3 .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py update-module-bazel python3 .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py check-module-bazel ``` The update command rewrites the matching `rusty_v8_<crate_version>` `http_file` SHA-256 values in `MODULE.bazel` from `third_party/v8/rusty_v8_<crate_version>.sha256`. The check command is also wired into Bazel CI to block drift. ## Notes - This intentionally excludes RustSec dependency upgrades and bubblewrap-related changes per request. - The branch was rebased onto the latest origin/main before opening the PR. ## Validation - cargo fetch --locked - cargo deny check advisories - cargo deny check - cargo deny check sources - python3 .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py check-module-bazel - python3 .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py update-module-bazel - python3 -m unittest discover -s .github/scripts -p 'test_rusty_v8_bazel.py' - python3 -m py_compile .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py .github/scripts/rusty_v8_module_bazel.py .github/scripts/test_rusty_v8_bazel.py - repo-wide GitHub Actions `uses:` audit: all external action refs are pinned to 40-character SHAs - yq eval on touched workflows and local actions - git diff --check - just bazel-lock-check ## Hash verification - Confirmed `MODULE.bazel` hashes match `third_party/v8/rusty_v8_146_4_0.sha256`. - Confirmed GitHub release asset digests for denoland/rusty_v8 `v146.4.0` and openai/codex `rusty-v8-v146.4.0` match the checked-in hashes. - Streamed and SHA-256 hashed all 10 `MODULE.bazel` rusty_v8 asset URLs locally; every downloaded byte stream matched both `MODULE.bazel` and the checked-in manifest. ## Pin verification - Confirmed signing-action pins match the peeled commits for their tag comments: `sigstore/cosign-installer@v3.7.0`, `azure/login@v2`, and `azure/trusted-signing-action@v0`. - Pinned the remaining tag-based action refs in Bazel CI/setup: `actions/setup-node@v6`, `facebook/install-dotslash@v2`, `bazelbuild/setup-bazelisk@v3`, and `actions/cache/restore@v5`. - Normalized all `bazelbuild/setup-bazelisk@v3` refs to the peeled commit behind the annotated tag. - Audited Cargo git dependencies: every manifest git dependency uses `rev` only, every `Cargo.lock` git source has `?rev=<sha>#<same-sha>`, and `cargo deny check sources` passes with `required-git-spec = "rev"`. - Shallow-fetched each distinct git dependency repo at its pinned SHA and verified Git reports each object as a commit.
viyatb-oai 路
2026-04-14 01:45:41 +00:00 -
[codex] Pin GitHub Actions workflow references (#15828)
Pin floating external GitHub Actions workflow refs to immutable SHAs. Why are we doing this? Please see the rationale doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qOURCNx2zszQ0uWx7Fj5ERu4jpiYjxLVWBWgKa2wTsA/edit?tab=t.0 Did this break you? Please roll back and let hintz@ know
Drew Hintz 路
2026-03-27 23:00:05 +00:00 -
bazel: re-organize bazelrc (#15522)
Replaced ci.bazelrc and v8-ci.bazelrc by custom configs inside the main .bazelrc file. As a result, github workflows setup is simplified down to a single '--config=<foo>' flag usage. Moved the build metadata flags to config=ci. Added custom tags metadata to help differentiate invocations based on workflow (bazel vs v8) and os (linux/macos/windows). Enabled users to override the default values in .bazelrc by using a user.bazelrc file locally. Added user.bazelrc to gitignore.
Son Luong Ngoc 路
2026-03-26 16:50:07 -07:00 -
V8 Bazel Build (#15021)
Alternative approach, we use rusty_v8 for all platforms that its predefined, but lets build from source a musl v8 version with bazel for x86 and aarch64 only. We would need to release this on github and then use the release.
Channing Conger 路
2026-03-19 18:05:23 -07:00