codex

chore: remove the TypeScript code from the repository (#2048 )

This deletes the bulk of the `codex-cli` folder and eliminates the logic
that builds the TypeScript code and bundles it into the release.

Since this PR modifies `.github/workflows/rust-release.yml`, to test
changes to the release process, I locally commented out all of the "is
this commit on upstream `main`" checks in
`scripts/create_github_release.sh` and ran:

```
./codex-rs/scripts/create_github_release.sh 0.20.0-alpha.4
```

Which kicked off:

https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/16842085113

And the release artifacts appear legit!

https://github.com/openai/codex/releases/tag/rust-v0.20.0-alpha.4

Michael Bolin · 2025-08-08 16:09:39 -07:00

408c7ca142

chore: add support for a new label, codex-rust-review (#1744 )

The goal of this change is to try an experiment where we try to get AI
to take on more of the code review load. The idea is that once you
believe your PR is ready for review, please add the `codex-rust-review`
label (as opposed to the `codex-review` label).

Admittedly the corresponding prompt currently represents my personal
biases in terms of code review, but we should massage it over time to
represent the team's preferences.

Michael Bolin · 2025-07-30 17:49:07 -07:00

35010812c7

chore(rs): update dependencies (#1494 )

### Chores
- Update cargo dependencies
- Remove unused cargo dependencies
- Fix clippy warnings
- Update Dockerfile (package.json requires node 22)
- Let Dependabot update bun, cargo, devcontainers, docker,
github-actions, npm (nix still not supported)

### TODO
- Upgrade dependencies with breaking changes

```shell
$ cargo update --verbose
   Unchanged crossterm v0.28.1 (available: v0.29.0)
   Unchanged schemars v0.8.22 (available: v1.0.4)
```

Rene Leonhardt · 2025-07-10 11:08:16 -07:00

82b0cebe8b

fix: missed a step in #1171 for codex.yml (#1172 )

Missed in my copy/paste.

Michael Bolin · 2025-05-30 11:04:41 -07:00

0f40ef5a10

fix: update outdated repo setup in codex.yml (#1171 )

We should do some work to share the setup logic across `codex.yml`,
`ci.yml`, and `rust-ci.yml`.

Michael Bolin · 2025-05-30 10:58:57 -07:00

8676185389

feat: initial import of experimental GitHub Action (#1170 )

This is a first cut at a GitHub Action that lets you define prompt
templates in `.md` files under `.github/codex/labels` that will run
Codex with the associated prompt when the label is added to a GitHub
pull request.

For example, this PR includes these files:

```
.github/codex/labels/codex-attempt.md
.github/codex/labels/codex-code-review.md
.github/codex/labels/codex-investigate-issue.md
```

And the new `.github/workflows/codex.yml` workflow declares the
following triggers:

```yaml
on:
  issues:
    types: [opened, labeled]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
    types: [labeled]
```

as well as the following expression to gate the action:

```
jobs:
  codex:
    if: |
      (github.event_name == 'issues' && (
        (github.event.action == 'labeled' && (github.event.label.name == 'codex-attempt' || github.event.label.name == 'codex-investigate-issue'))
      )) ||
      (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.action == 'labeled' && github.event.label.name == 'codex-code-review')
```

Note the "actor" who added the label must have write access to the repo
for the action to take effect.

After adding a label, the action will "ack" the request by replacing the
original label (e.g., `codex-review`) with an `-in-progress` suffix
(e.g., `codex-review-in-progress`). When it is finished, it will swap
the `-in-progress` label with a `-completed` one (e.g.,
`codex-review-completed`).

Users of the action are responsible for providing an `OPENAI_API_KEY`
and making it available as a secret to the action.

Michael Bolin · 2025-05-30 10:55:28 -07:00

baa92f37e0

6 Commits