## Summary
When auto-review is enabled, it should handle request_permissions tool.
We'll need to clean up the UX but I'm planning to do that in a separate
pass
## Testing
- [x] Ran locally
<img width="893" height="396" alt="Screenshot 2026-04-17 at 1 16 13 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c045c5f-1138-4c6c-ac6e-2cb6be4514d8"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Why
Guardian review analytics needs a Rust event shape that matches the
backend schema while avoiding unnecessary PII exposure from reviewed
tool calls. This PR narrows the analytics payload to the fields we
intend to emit and keeps shared Guardian assessment enums in protocol
instead of duplicating equivalent analytics-only enums.
## What changed
- Uses protocol Guardian enums directly for `risk_level`,
`user_authorization`, `outcome`, and command source values.
- Removes high-risk reviewed-action fields from the analytics payload,
including raw commands, display strings, working directories, file
paths, network targets/hosts, justification text, retry reason, and
rationale text.
- Makes `target_item_id` and `tool_call_count` nullable so the Codex
event can represent cases where the app-server protocol or producer does
not have those values.
- Keeps lower-risk structured reviewed-action metadata such as sandbox
permissions, permission profile, `tty`, `execve` source/program, network
protocol/port, and MCP connector/tool labels.
- Adds an analytics reducer/client test covering `codex_guardian_review`
serialization with an optional `target_item_id` and absent removed
fields.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-analytics
guardian_review_event_ingests_custom_fact_with_optional_target_item`
- `cargo fmt --check`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/17692).
* #17696
* #17695
* #17693
* __->__ #17692
## Summary
This is the minimal client-side follow-up for the Codex Auto Review
model slug rollout. It updates the guardian reviewer preferred model
from `gpt-5.4` to `codex-auto-review`, so the client can rely on the
backend catalog + Statsig mapping instead of hardcoding the GPT-5.4
slug.
Context:
https://openai.slack.com/archives/C0AF9328RL0/p1775777479388369?thread_ts=1775773094.071629&cid=C0AF9328RL0
## Testing
- `cargo fmt --package codex-core --check`
- `cargo test -p codex-core guardian::`
- `bazel test --experimental_remote_downloader= --test_output=errors
//codex-rs/core:core-unit-tests --test_arg=guardian`
**Summary**
This PR treats Guardian timeouts as distinct from explicit denials in
the core approval paths.
Timeouts now return timeout-specific guidance instead of Guardian
policy-rejection messaging.
It updates the command, shell, network, and MCP approval flows and adds
focused test coverage.
## Description
This PR introduces `review_id` as the stable identifier for guardian
reviews and exposes it in app-server `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
and `item/autoApprovalReview/completed` events.
Internally, guardian rejection state is now keyed by `review_id` instead
of the reviewed tool item ID. `target_item_id` is still included when a
review maps to a concrete thread item, but it is no longer overloaded as
the review lifecycle identifier.
## Motivation
We'd like to give users the ability to preempt a guardian review while
it's running (approve or decline).
However, we can't implement the API that allows the user to override a
running guardian review because we didn't have a unique `review_id` per
guardian review. Using `target_item_id` is not correct since:
- with execve reviews, there can be multiple execve calls (and therefore
guardian reviews) per shell command
- with network policy reviews, there is no target item ID
The PR that actually implements user overrides will use `review_id` as
the stable identifier.
## Description
We reuse a guardian thread for a given user thread when we can. However,
we had always sent the full transcript history every time we made a
followup review request to an existing guardian thread.
This is especially bad for long guardian threads since we keep
re-appending old transcript entries instead of just what has changed.
The fix is to just send what's new.
**Caveat**: Whenever a thread is compacted or rolled back, we fall back
to sending the full transcript to guardian again since the thread's
history has been modified. However in the happy path we get a nice
optimization.
## Before
Initial guardian review sends the full parent transcript:
```
The following is the Codex agent history whose request action you are assessing...
>>> TRANSCRIPT START
[1] user: Please check the repo visibility and push the docs fix if needed.
[2] tool gh_repo_view call: {"repo":"openai/codex"}
[3] tool gh_repo_view result: repo visibility: public
[4] assistant: The repo is public; I now need approval to push the docs fix.
>>> TRANSCRIPT END
The Codex agent has requested the following action:
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST START
...
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST END
```
And a followup to the same guardian thread would send the full
transcript again (including items 1-4 we already sent):
```
The following is the Codex agent history whose request action you are assessing...
>>> TRANSCRIPT START
[1] user: Please check the repo visibility and push the docs fix if needed.
[2] tool gh_repo_view call: {"repo":"openai/codex"}
[3] tool gh_repo_view result: repo visibility: public
[4] assistant: The repo is public; I now need approval to push the docs fix.
[5] user: Please push the second docs fix too.
[6] assistant: I need approval for the second docs fix.
>>> TRANSCRIPT END
The Codex agent has requested the following action:
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST START
...
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST END
```
## After
Initial guardian review sends the full parent transcript (this is
unchanged):
```
The following is the Codex agent history whose request action you are assessing...
>>> TRANSCRIPT START
[1] user: Please check the repo visibility and push the docs fix if needed.
[2] tool gh_repo_view call: {"repo":"openai/codex"}
[3] tool gh_repo_view result: repo visibility: public
[4] assistant: The repo is public; I now need approval to push the docs fix.
>>> TRANSCRIPT END
The Codex agent has requested the following action:
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST START
...
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST END
```
But a followup now sends:
```
The following is the Codex agent history added since your last approval assessment. Continue the same review conversation...
>>> TRANSCRIPT DELTA START
[5] user: Please push the second docs fix too.
[6] assistant: I need approval for the second docs fix.
>>> TRANSCRIPT DELTA END
The Codex agent has requested the following next action:
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST START
...
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST END
```
## Description
This PR changes guardian transcript compaction so oversized
conversations no longer collapse into a nearly empty placeholder.
Before this change, if the retained user history alone exceeded the
message budget, guardian would replace the entire transcript with
`<transcript omitted to preserve budget for planned action>`!
That meant approvals, especially network approvals, could lose the
recent tool call and tool result that explained what guardian was
actually reviewing. Now we keep a compact but usable transcript instead
of dropping it all.
### Before
```
The following is the Codex agent history whose request action you are assessing...
>>> TRANSCRIPT START
<transcript omitted to preserve budget for planned action>
>>> TRANSCRIPT END
Conversation transcript omitted due to size.
The Codex agent has requested the following action:
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST START
Retry reason:
Sandbox blocked outbound network access.
Assess the exact planned action below. Use read-only tool checks when local state matters.
Planned action JSON:
{
"tool": "network_access",
"target": "https://example.com:443",
"host": "example.com",
"protocol": "https",
"port": 443
}
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST END
```
### After
```
The following is the Codex agent history whose request action you are assessing...
>>> TRANSCRIPT START
[1] user: Please investigate why uploads to example.com are failing and retry if needed.
[8] user: If the request looks correct, go ahead and try again with network access.
[9] tool shell call: {"command":["curl","-X","POST","https://example.com/upload"],"cwd":"/repo"}
[10] tool shell result: sandbox blocked outbound network access
>>> TRANSCRIPT END
Some conversation entries were omitted.
The Codex agent has requested the following action:
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST START
Retry reason:
Sandbox blocked outbound network access.
Assess the exact planned action below. Use read-only tool checks when local state matters.
Planned action JSON:
{
"tool": "network_access",
"target": "https://example.com:443",
"host": "example.com",
"protocol": "https",
"port": 443
}
>>> APPROVAL REQUEST END
```
## Description
Previously the `action` field on `EventMsg::GuardianAssessment`, which
describes what Guardian is reviewing, was typed as an arbitrary JSON
blob. This PR cleans it up and defines a sum type representing all the
various actions that Guardian can review.
This is a breaking change (on purpose), which is fine because:
- the Codex app / VSCE does not actually use `action` at the moment
- the TUI code that consumes `action` is updated in this PR as well
- rollout files that serialized old `EventMsg::GuardianAssessment` will
just silently drop these guardian events
- the contract is defined as unstable, so other clients have a fair
warning :)
This will make things much easier for followup Guardian work.
## Why
The old guardian review payloads worked, but they pushed too much shape
knowledge into downstream consumers. The TUI had custom JSON parsing
logic for commands, patches, network requests, and MCP calls, and the
app-server protocol was effectively just passing through an opaque blob.
Typing this at the protocol boundary makes the contract clearer.
## Summary
- reuse a guardian subagent session across approvals so reviews keep a
stable prompt cache key and avoid one-shot startup overhead
- clear the guardian child history before each review so prior guardian
decisions do not leak into later approvals
- include the `smart_approvals` -> `guardian_approval` feature flag
rename in the same PR to minimize release latency on a very tight
timeline
- add regression coverage for prompt-cache-key reuse without
prior-review prompt bleed
## Request
- Bug/enhancement request: internal guardian prompt-cache and latency
improvement request
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
rhan-oaiandGitHub
Jeff HarrisandGitHub
Won ParkandGitHub
Owen LinandGitHub
