I installed the GitHub Actions extension for VS Code and it started
giving me lint warnings about this line:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/a9adb4175c8f19a97e50be53cb6f8fe7ef159762/.github/workflows/rust-ci.yml#L99
Using an env var to track the state of individual steps was not great,
so I did some research about GitHub actions, which led to the discovery
of combining `continue-on-error: true` with `if .. steps.STEP.outcome ==
'failure'...`.
Apparently there is also a `failure()` macro that is supposed to make
this simpler, but I saw a number of complains online about it not
working as expected. Checking `outcome` seems maybe more reliable at the
cost of being slightly more verbose.
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/855 added the clippy warning to
disallow `unwrap()`, but apparently we were not verifying that tests
were "clippy clean" in CI, so I ended up with a lot of local errors in
VS Code.
This turns on the check in CI and fixes the offenders.
I started this PR because I wanted to share the `format_duration()`
utility function in `codex-rs/exec/src/event_processor.rs` with the TUI.
The question was: where to put it?
`core` should have as few dependencies as possible, so moving it there
would introduce a dependency on `chrono`, which seemed undesirable.
`core` already had this `cli` feature to deal with a similar situation
around sharing common utility functions, so I decided to:
* make `core` feature-free
* introduce `common`
* `common` can have as many "special interest" features as it needs,
each of which can declare their own deps
* the first two features of common are `cli` and `elapsed`
In practice, this meant updating a number of `Cargo.toml` files,
replacing this line:
```toml
codex-core = { path = "../core", features = ["cli"] }
```
with these:
```toml
codex-core = { path = "../core" }
codex-common = { path = "../common", features = ["cli"] }
```
Moving `format_duration()` into its own file gave it some "breathing
room" to add a unit test, so I had Codex generate some tests and new
support for durations over 1 minute.
I discovered that `cargo build` worked for the entire workspace, but not
for the `mcp-client` or `core` crates.
* `mcp-client` failed to build because it underspecified the set of
features it needed from `tokio`.
* `core` failed to build because it was using a "feature" of its own
crate in the default, no-feature version.
This PR fixes the builds and adds a check in CI to defend against this
sort of thing going forward.
The `rust-ci.yml` build appears to be a bit flaky (we're looking into
it...), so to save TypeScript contributors some noise, restrict the
`rust-ci.yml` job so that it only runs on PRs that touch files in
`codex-rs/`.
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
Michael Bolin ·
Parker Thompson ·