mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
0e78ce80eebbb08856e4a212ecd045ab42d72948
17 Commits
-
Rebrand approvals reviewer config to auto-review (#18504)
### Why Auto-review is the user-facing name for the approvals reviewer, but the config/API value still exposed the old `guardian_subagent` name. That made new configs and generated schemas point users at Guardian terminology even though the intended product surface is Auto-review. This PR updates the external `approvals_reviewer` value while preserving compatibility for existing configs and clients. ### What changed - Makes `auto_review` the canonical serialized value for `approvals_reviewer`. - Keeps `guardian_subagent` accepted as a legacy alias. - Keeps `user` accepted and serialized as `user`. - Updates generated config and app-server schemas so `approvals_reviewer` includes: - `user` - `auto_review` - `guardian_subagent` - Updates app-server README docs for the reviewer value. - Updates analytics and config requirements tests for the canonical auto_review value. ### Compatibility Existing configs and API payloads using: ```toml approvals_reviewer = "guardian_subagent" ``` continue to load and map to the Auto-review reviewer behavior. New serialization emits: ```toml approvals_reviewer = "auto_review" ``` This PR intentionally does not rename the [features].guardian_approval key or broad internal Guardian symbols. Those are split out for a follow-up PR to keep this migration small and avoid touching large TUI/internal surfaces. **Verification** cargo test -p codex-protocol approvals_reviewer_serializes_auto_review_and_accepts_legacy_guardian_subagent cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol approvals_reviewer_serializes_auto_review_and_accepts_legacy_guardian_subagent
Won Park ·
2026-04-22 15:45:35 -07:00 -
app-server: accept permission profile overrides (#18279)
## Why `PermissionProfile` is becoming the canonical permissions shape shared by core and app-server. After app-server responses expose the active profile, clients need to be able to send that same shape back when starting, resuming, forking, or overriding a turn instead of translating through the legacy `sandbox`/`sandboxPolicy` shorthands. This still needs to preserve the existing requirements/platform enforcement model. A profile-shaped request can be downgraded or rejected by constraints, but the server should keep the user's elevated-access intent for project trust decisions. Turn-level profile overrides also need to retain existing read protections, including deny-read entries and bounded glob-scan metadata, so a permission override cannot accidentally drop configured protections such as `**/*.env = deny`. ## What changed - Adds optional `permissionProfile` request fields to `thread/start`, `thread/resume`, `thread/fork`, and `turn/start`. - Rejects ambiguous requests that specify both `permissionProfile` and the legacy `sandbox`/`sandboxPolicy` fields, including running-thread resume requests. - Converts profile-shaped overrides into core runtime filesystem/network permissions while continuing to derive the constrained legacy sandbox projection used by existing execution paths. - Preserves project-trust intent for profile overrides that are equivalent to workspace-write or full-access sandbox requests. - Preserves existing deny-read entries and `globScanMaxDepth` when applying turn-level `permissionProfile` overrides. - Updates app-server docs plus generated JSON/TypeScript schema fixtures and regression coverage. ## Verification - `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol schema_fixtures` - `cargo test -p codex-core session_configuration_apply_permission_profile_preserves_existing_deny_read_entries` --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/18279). * #18288 * #18287 * #18286 * #18285 * #18284 * #18283 * #18282 * #18281 * #18280 * __->__ #18279
Michael Bolin ·
2026-04-22 13:34:33 -07:00 -
Add turn-scoped environment selections (#18416)
## Summary - add experimental turn/start.environments params for per-turn environment id + cwd selections - pass selections through core protocol ops and resolve them with EnvironmentManager before TurnContext creation - treat omitted selections as default behavior, empty selections as no environment, and non-empty selections as first environment/cwd as the turn primary ## Testing - ran `just fmt` - ran `just write-app-server-schema` - not run: unit tests for this stacked PR --------- Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
starr-openai ·
2026-04-21 17:48:33 -07:00 -
Add Smart Approvals guardian review across core, app-server, and TUI (#13860)
## Summary - add `approvals_reviewer = "user" | "guardian_subagent"` as the runtime control for who reviews approval requests - route Smart Approvals guardian review through core for command execution, file changes, managed-network approvals, MCP approvals, and delegated/subagent approval flows - expose guardian review in app-server with temporary unstable `item/autoApprovalReview/{started,completed}` notifications carrying `targetItemId`, `review`, and `action` - update the TUI so Smart Approvals can be enabled from `/experimental`, aligned with the matching `/approvals` mode, and surfaced clearly while reviews are pending or resolved ## Runtime model This PR does not introduce a new `approval_policy`. Instead: - `approval_policy` still controls when approval is needed - `approvals_reviewer` controls who reviewable approval requests are routed to: - `user` - `guardian_subagent` `guardian_subagent` is a carefully prompted reviewer subagent that gathers relevant context and applies a risk-based decision framework before approving or denying the request. The `smart_approvals` feature flag is a rollout/UI gate. Core runtime behavior keys off `approvals_reviewer`. When Smart Approvals is enabled from the TUI, it also switches the current `/approvals` settings to the matching Smart Approvals mode so users immediately see guardian review in the active thread: - `approval_policy = on-request` - `approvals_reviewer = guardian_subagent` - `sandbox_mode = workspace-write` Users can still change `/approvals` afterward. Config-load behavior stays intentionally narrow: - plain `smart_approvals = true` in `config.toml` remains just the rollout/UI gate and does not auto-set `approvals_reviewer` - the deprecated `guardian_approval = true` alias migration does backfill `approvals_reviewer = "guardian_subagent"` in the same scope when that reviewer is not already configured there, so old configs preserve their original guardian-enabled behavior ARC remains a separate safety check. For MCP tool approvals, ARC escalations now flow into the configured reviewer instead of always bypassing guardian and forcing manual review. ## Config stability The runtime reviewer override is stable, but the config-backed app-server protocol shape is still settling. - `thread/start`, `thread/resume`, and `turn/start` keep stable `approvalsReviewer` overrides - the config-backed `approvals_reviewer` exposure returned via `config/read` (including profile-level config) is now marked `[UNSTABLE]` / experimental in the app-server protocol until we are more confident in that config surface ## App-server surface This PR intentionally keeps the guardian app-server shape narrow and temporary. It adds generic unstable lifecycle notifications: - `item/autoApprovalReview/started` - `item/autoApprovalReview/completed` with payloads of the form: - `{ threadId, turnId, targetItemId, review, action? }` `review` is currently: - `{ status, riskScore?, riskLevel?, rationale? }` - where `status` is one of `inProgress`, `approved`, `denied`, or `aborted` `action` carries the guardian action summary payload from core when available. This lets clients render temporary standalone pending-review UI, including parallel reviews, even when the underlying tool item has not been emitted yet. These notifications are explicitly documented as `[UNSTABLE]` and expected to change soon. This PR does **not** persist guardian review state onto `thread/read` tool items. The intended follow-up is to attach guardian review state to the reviewed tool item lifecycle instead, which would improve consistency with manual approvals and allow thread history / reconnect flows to replay guardian review state directly. ## TUI behavior - `/experimental` exposes the rollout gate as `Smart Approvals` - enabling it in the TUI enables the feature and switches the current session to the matching Smart Approvals `/approvals` mode - disabling it in the TUI clears the persisted `approvals_reviewer` override when appropriate and returns the session to default manual review when the effective reviewer changes - `/approvals` still exposes the reviewer choice directly - the TUI renders: - pending guardian review state in the live status footer, including parallel review aggregation - resolved approval/denial state in history ## Scope notes This PR includes the supporting core/runtime work needed to make Smart Approvals usable end-to-end: - shell / unified-exec / apply_patch / managed-network / MCP guardian review - delegated/subagent approval routing into guardian review - guardian review risk metadata and action summaries for app-server/TUI - config/profile/TUI handling for `smart_approvals`, `guardian_approval` alias migration, and `approvals_reviewer` - a small internal cleanup of delegated approval forwarding to dedupe fallback paths and simplify guardian-vs-parent approval waiting (no intended behavior change) Out of scope for this PR: - redesigning the existing manual approval protocol shapes - persisting guardian review state onto app-server `ThreadItem`s - delegated MCP elicitation auto-review (the current delegated MCP guardian shim only covers the legacy `RequestUserInput` path) --------- Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>Charley Cunningham ·
2026-03-13 15:27:00 -07:00 -
Jack Mousseau ·
2026-03-12 16:38:04 -07:00 -
chore: add a separate reject-policy flag for skill approvals (#14271)
## Summary - add `skill_approval` to `RejectConfig` and the app-server v2 `AskForApproval::Reject` payload so skill-script prompts can be configured independently from sandbox and rule-based prompts - update Unix shell escalation to reject prompts based on the actual decision source, keeping prefix rules tied to `rules`, unmatched command fallbacks tied to `sandbox_approval`, and skill scripts tied to `skill_approval` - regenerate the affected protocol/config schemas and expand unit/integration coverage for the new flag and skill approval behavior
Celia Chen ·
2026-03-11 12:33:09 -07:00 -
fix(core) default RejectConfig.request_permissions (#14165)
## Summary Adds a default here so existing config deserializes ## Testing - [x] Added a unit test
Dylan Hurd ·
2026-03-10 04:56:23 +00:00 -
feat(approvals) RejectConfig for request_permissions (#14118)
## Summary We need to support allowing request_permissions calls when using `Reject` policy <img width="1133" height="588" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 12 06 40 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8df987f-c225-4866-b8ab-5590960daec5" /> Note that this is a backwards-incompatible change for Reject policy. I'm not sure if we need to add a default based on our current use/setup ## Testing - [x] Added tests - [x] Tested locally
Dylan Hurd ·
2026-03-09 18:16:54 -07:00 -
Val Kharitonov ·
2026-03-03 22:46:05 -08:00 -
Feat: Preserve network access on read-only sandbox policies (#13409)
## Summary `PermissionProfile.network` could not be preserved when additional or compiled permissions resolved to `SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly`, because `ReadOnly` had no network_access field. This change makes read-only + network enabled representable directly and threads that through the protocol, app-server v2 mirror, and permission- merging logic. ## What changed - Added `network_access: bool` to `SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly` in the core protocol and app-server v2 protocol. - Kept backward compatibility by defaulting the new field to false, so legacy read-only payloads still deserialize unchanged. - Updated `has_full_network_access()` and sandbox summaries to respect read-only network access. - Preserved PermissionProfile.network when: - compiling skill permission profiles into sandbox policies - normalizing additional permissions - merging additional permissions into existing sandbox policies - Updated the approval overlay to show network in the rendered permission rule when requested. - Regenerated app-server schema fixtures for the new v2 wire shape.Celia Chen ·
2026-03-04 02:41:57 +00:00 -
app-server service tier plumbing (plus some cleanup) (#13334)
followup to https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/13212 to expose fast tier controls to app server (majority of this PR is generated schema jsons - actual code is +69 / -35 and +24 tests ) - add service tier fields to the app-server protocol surfaces used by thread lifecycle, turn start, config, and session configured events - thread service tier through the app-server message processor and core thread config snapshots - allow runtime config overrides to carry service tier for app-server callers cleanup: - Removing useless "legacy" code supporting "standard" - we moved to None | "fast", so "standard" is not needed.
pash-openai ·
2026-03-03 02:35:09 -08:00 -
feat: add Reject approval policy with granular prompt rejection controls (#12087)
## Why We need a way to auto-reject specific approval prompt categories without switching all approvals off. The goal is to let users independently control: - sandbox escalation approvals, - execpolicy `prompt` rule approvals, - MCP elicitation prompts. ## What changed - Added a new primary approval mode in `protocol/src/protocol.rs`: ```rust pub enum AskForApproval { // ... Reject(RejectConfig), // ... } pub struct RejectConfig { pub sandbox_approval: bool, pub rules: bool, pub mcp_elicitations: bool, } ``` - Wired `RejectConfig` semantics through approval paths in `core`: - `core/src/exec_policy.rs` - rejects rule-driven prompts when `rules = true` - rejects sandbox/escalation prompts when `sandbox_approval = true` - preserves rule priority when both rule and sandbox prompt conditions are present - `core/src/tools/sandboxing.rs` - applies `sandbox_approval` to default exec approval decisions and sandbox-failure retry gating - `core/src/safety.rs` - keeps `Reject { all false }` behavior aligned with `OnRequest` for patch safety - rejects out-of-root patch approvals when `sandbox_approval = true` - `core/src/mcp_connection_manager.rs` - auto-declines MCP elicitations when `mcp_elicitations = true` - Ensured approval policy used by MCP elicitation flow stays in sync with constrained session policy updates. - Updated app-server v2 conversions and generated schema/TypeScript artifacts for the new `Reject` shape. ## Verification Added focused unit coverage for the new behavior in: - `core/src/exec_policy.rs` - `core/src/tools/sandboxing.rs` - `core/src/mcp_connection_manager.rs` - `core/src/safety.rs` - `core/src/tools/runtimes/apply_patch.rs` Key cases covered include rule-vs-sandbox prompt precedence, MCP auto-decline behavior, and patch/sandbox retry behavior under `RejectConfig`.Michael Bolin ·
2026-02-19 11:41:49 -08:00 -
feat: make sandbox read access configurable with
ReadOnlyAccess(#11387)`SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly` previously implied broad read access and could not express a narrower read surface. This change introduces an explicit read-access model so we can support user-configurable read restrictions in follow-up work, while preserving current behavior today. It also ensures unsupported backends fail closed for restricted-read policies instead of silently granting broader access than intended. ## What - Added `ReadOnlyAccess` in protocol with: - `Restricted { include_platform_defaults, readable_roots }` - `FullAccess` - Updated `SandboxPolicy` to carry read-access configuration: - `ReadOnly { access: ReadOnlyAccess }` - `WorkspaceWrite { ..., read_only_access: ReadOnlyAccess }` - Preserved existing behavior by defaulting current construction paths to `ReadOnlyAccess::FullAccess`. - Threaded the new fields through sandbox policy consumers and call sites across `core`, `tui`, `linux-sandbox`, `windows-sandbox`, and related tests. - Updated Seatbelt policy generation to honor restricted read roots by emitting scoped read rules when full read access is not granted. - Added fail-closed behavior on Linux and Windows backends when restricted read access is requested but not yet implemented there (`UnsupportedOperation`). - Regenerated app-server protocol schema and TypeScript artifacts, including `ReadOnlyAccess`. ## Compatibility / rollout - Runtime behavior remains unchanged by default (`FullAccess`). - API/schema changes are in place so future config wiring can enable restricted read access without another policy-shape migration.Michael Bolin ·
2026-02-11 18:31:14 -08:00 -
chore(app-server): add experimental annotation to relevant fields (#10928)
These fields had always been documented as experimental/unstable with docstrings, but now let's actually use the `experimental` annotation to be more explicit. - thread/start.experimentalRawEvents - thread/resume.history - thread/resume.path - thread/fork.path - turn/start.collaborationMode - account/login/start.chatgptAuthTokens
Owen Lin ·
2026-02-06 20:48:04 +00:00 -
add none personality option (#10688)
- add none personality enum value and empty placeholder behavior\n- add docs/schema updates and e2e coverage
Ahmed Ibrahim ·
2026-02-04 15:40:33 -08:00 -
Cleanup collaboration mode variants (#10404)
## Summary This PR simplifies collaboration modes to the visible set `default | plan`, while preserving backward compatibility for older partners that may still send legacy mode names. Specifically: - Renames the old Code behavior to **Default**. - Keeps **Plan** as-is. - Removes **Custom** mode behavior (fallbacks now resolve to Default). - Keeps `PairProgramming` and `Execute` internally for compatibility plumbing, while removing them from schema/API and UI visibility. - Adds legacy input aliasing so older clients can still send old mode names. ## What Changed 1. Mode enum and compatibility - `ModeKind` now uses `Plan` + `Default` as active/public modes. - `ModeKind::Default` deserialization accepts legacy values: - `code` - `pair_programming` - `execute` - `custom` - `PairProgramming` and `Execute` variants remain in code but are hidden from protocol/schema generation. - `Custom` variant is removed; previous custom fallbacks now map to `Default`. 2. Collaboration presets and templates - Built-in presets now return only: - `Plan` - `Default` - Template rename: - `core/templates/collaboration_mode/code.md` -> `default.md` - `execute.md` and `pair_programming.md` remain on disk but are not surfaced in visible preset lists. 3. TUI updates - Updated user-facing naming and prompts from “Code” to “Default”. - Updated mode-cycle and indicator behavior to reflect only visible `Plan` and `Default`. - Updated corresponding tests and snapshots. 4. request_user_input behavior - `request_user_input` remains allowed only in `Plan` mode. - Rejection messaging now consistently treats non-plan modes as `Default`. 5. Schemas - Regenerated config and app-server schemas. - Public schema types now advertise mode values as: - `plan` - `default` ## Backward Compatibility Notes - Incoming legacy mode names (`code`, `pair_programming`, `execute`, `custom`) are accepted and coerced to `default`. - Outgoing/public schema surfaces intentionally expose only `plan | default`. - This allows tolerant ingestion of older partner payloads while standardizing new integrations on the reduced mode set. ## Codex author `codex fork 019c1fae-693b-7840-b16e-9ad38ea0bd00`
Charley Cunningham ·
2026-02-03 09:23:53 -08:00 -
feat: vendor app-server protocol schema fixtures (#10371)
Similar to what @sayan-oai did in openai/codex#8956 for `config.schema.json`, this PR updates the repo so that it includes the output of `codex app-server generate-json-schema` and `codex app-server generate-ts` and adds a test to verify it is in sync with the current code. Motivation: - This makes any schema changes introduced by a PR transparent during code review. - In particular, this should help us catch PRs that would introduce a non-backwards-compatible change to the app schema (eventually, this should also be enforced by tooling). - Once https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/10231 is in to formalize the notion of "experimental" fields, we can work on ensuring the non-experimental bits are backwards-compatible. `codex-rs/app-server-protocol/tests/schema_fixtures.rs` was added as the test and `just write-app-server-schema` can be use to generate the vendored schema files. Incidentally, when I run: ``` rg _ codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema/typescript/v2 ``` I see a number of `snake_case` names that should be `camelCase`.
Michael Bolin ·
2026-02-01 23:38:43 -08:00