mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
dev
10 Commits
-
build: run buildifier from just fmt (#28125)
## Intent Keep Bazel and Starlark files consistently formatted without requiring contributors to install or version buildifier themselves. ## Implementation - Add a SHA-256-pinned, cross-platform DotSlash manifest for buildifier v8.5.1. - Run buildifier from the shared `just fmt` and `just fmt-check` driver, with Windows-safe explicit DotSlash invocation. - Provision DotSlash in formatting CI and contributor devcontainers, and document the source-build prerequisite. - Apply the initial mechanical buildifier formatting baseline.
Adam Perry @ OpenAI ·
2026-06-13 21:43:39 -07:00 -
Disable empty Cargo test targets (#21584)
## Summary `cargo test` has entails both running standard Rust tests and doctests. It turns out that the doctest discovery is fairly slow, and it's a cost you pay even for crates that don't include any doctests. This PR disables doctests with `doctest = false` for crates that lack any doctests. For the collection of crates below, this speeds up test execution by >4x. E.g., before this PR: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-absolute-path -p codex-utils-cache -p codex-utils-cli -p codex-utils-home-dir -p codex-utils-output-truncation -p codex-utils-path -p codex-utils-string -p codex-utils-template -p codex-utils-elapsed -p codex-utils-json-to-toml Time (mean ± σ): 1.849 s ± 4.455 s [User: 0.752 s, System: 1.367 s] Range (min … max): 0.418 s … 14.529 s 10 runs ``` And after: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-absolute-path -p codex-utils-cache -p codex-utils-cli -p codex-utils-home-dir -p codex-utils-output-truncation -p codex-utils-path -p codex-utils-string -p codex-utils-template -p codex-utils-elapsed -p codex-utils-json-to-toml Time (mean ± σ): 428.6 ms ± 6.9 ms [User: 187.7 ms, System: 219.7 ms] Range (min … max): 418.0 ms … 436.8 ms 10 runs ``` For a single crate, with >2x speedup, before: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-string Time (mean ± σ): 491.1 ms ± 9.0 ms [User: 229.8 ms, System: 234.9 ms] Range (min … max): 480.9 ms … 512.0 ms 10 runs ``` And after: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-string Time (mean ± σ): 213.9 ms ± 4.3 ms [User: 112.8 ms, System: 84.0 ms] Range (min … max): 206.8 ms … 221.0 ms 13 runs ``` Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Charlie Marsh ·
2026-05-07 15:44:17 -07:00 -
Fix Bazel cargo_bin runfiles paths (#19468)
## Summary Fix a Bazel-only path resolution bug in `codex_utils_cargo_bin::cargo_bin`. Under Bazel runfiles, `rlocation` can return a relative `bazel-out/...` path even though `cargo_bin()` documents that it returns an absolute path. That can break callers that store the returned binary path and later spawn it after changing cwd, because the relative path is resolved from the wrong directory. This patch absolutizes the runfiles-resolved path before returning it.
Curtis 'Fjord' Hawthorne ·
2026-04-24 17:47:31 -07:00 -
fix(ci): restore guardian coverage and bazel unit tests (#13912)
## Summary - restore the guardian review request snapshot test and its tracked snapshot after it was dropped from `main` - make Bazel Rust unit-test wrappers resolve runfiles correctly on manifest-only platforms like macOS and point Insta at the real workspace root - harden the shell-escalation socket-closure assertion so the musl Bazel test no longer depends on fd reuse behavior ## Verification - cargo test -p codex-core guardian_review_request_layout_matches_model_visible_request_snapshot - cargo test -p codex-shell-escalation - bazel test //codex-rs/exec:exec-unit-tests //codex-rs/shell-escalation:shell-escalation-unit-tests Supersedes #13894. --------- Co-authored-by: Ahmed Ibrahim <aibrahim@openai.com> Co-authored-by: viyatb-oai <viyatb@openai.com> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Charley Cunningham ·
2026-03-08 12:05:19 -07:00 -
feat: experimental flags (#10231)
## Problem being solved - We need a single, reliable way to mark app-server API surface as experimental so that: 1. the runtime can reject experimental usage unless the client opts in 2. generated TS/JSON schemas can exclude experimental methods/fields for stable clients. Right now that’s easy to drift or miss when done ad-hoc. ## How to declare experimental methods and fields - **Experimental method**: add `#[experimental("method/name")]` to the `ClientRequest` variant in `client_request_definitions!`. - **Experimental field**: on the params struct, derive `ExperimentalApi` and annotate the field with `#[experimental("method/name.field")]` + set `inspect_params: true` for the method variant so `ClientRequest::experimental_reason()` inspects params for experimental fields. ## How the macro solves it - The new derive macro lives in `codex-rs/codex-experimental-api-macros/src/lib.rs` and is used via `#[derive(ExperimentalApi)]` plus `#[experimental("reason")]` attributes. - **Structs**: - Generates `ExperimentalApi::experimental_reason(&self)` that checks only annotated fields. - The “presence” check is type-aware: - `Option<T>`: `is_some_and(...)` recursively checks inner. - `Vec`/`HashMap`/`BTreeMap`: must be non-empty. - `bool`: must be `true`. - Other types: considered present (returns `true`). - Registers each experimental field in an `inventory` with `(type_name, serialized field name, reason)` and exposes `EXPERIMENTAL_FIELDS` for that type. Field names are converted from `snake_case` to `camelCase` for schema/TS filtering. - **Enums**: - Generates an exhaustive `match` returning `Some(reason)` for annotated variants and `None` otherwise (no wildcard arm). - **Wiring**: - Runtime gating uses `ExperimentalApi::experimental_reason()` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs` to reject requests unless `InitializeParams.capabilities.experimental_api == true`. - Schema/TS export filters use the inventory list and `EXPERIMENTAL_CLIENT_METHODS` from `client_request_definitions!` to strip experimental methods/fields when `experimental_api` is false.jif-oai ·
2026-02-02 11:06:50 +00:00 -
[bazel] Improve runfiles handling (#10098)
we can't use runfiles directory on Windows due to path lengths, so swap to manifest strategy. Parsing the manifest is a bit complex and the format is changing in Bazel upstream, so pull in the official Rust library (via a small hack to make it importable...) and cleanup all the associated logic to work cleanly in both bazel and cargo without extra confusion
zbarsky-openai ·
2026-01-29 00:15:44 +00:00 -
feat: add support for building with Bazel (#8875)
This PR configures Codex CLI so it can be built with [Bazel](https://bazel.build) in addition to Cargo. The `.bazelrc` includes configuration so that remote builds can be done using [BuildBuddy](https://www.buildbuddy.io). If you are familiar with Bazel, things should work as you expect, e.g., run `bazel test //... --keep-going` to run all the tests in the repo, but we have also added some new aliases in the `justfile` for convenience: - `just bazel-test` to run tests locally - `just bazel-remote-test` to run tests remotely (currently, the remote build is for x86_64 Linux regardless of your host platform). Note we are currently seeing the following test failures in the remote build, so we still need to figure out what is happening here: ``` failures: suite::compact::manual_compact_twice_preserves_latest_user_messages suite::compact_resume_fork::compact_resume_after_second_compaction_preserves_history suite::compact_resume_fork::compact_resume_and_fork_preserve_model_history_view ``` - `just build-for-release` to build release binaries for all platforms/architectures remotely To setup remote execution: - [Create a buildbuddy account](https://app.buildbuddy.io/) (OpenAI employees should also request org access at https://openai.buildbuddy.io/join/ with their `@openai.com` email address.) - [Copy your API key](https://app.buildbuddy.io/docs/setup/) to `~/.bazelrc` (add the line `build --remote_header=x-buildbuddy-api-key=YOUR_KEY`) - Use `--config=remote` in your `bazel` invocations (or add `common --config=remote` to your `~/.bazelrc`, or use the `just` commands) ## CI In terms of CI, this PR introduces `.github/workflows/bazel.yml`, which uses Bazel to run the tests _locally_ on Mac and Linux GitHub runners (we are working on supporting Windows, but that is not ready yet). Note that the failures we are seeing in `just bazel-remote-test` do not occur on these GitHub CI jobs, so everything in `.github/workflows/bazel.yml` is green right now. The `bazel.yml` uses extra config in `.github/workflows/ci.bazelrc` so that macOS CI jobs build _remotely_ on Linux hosts (using the `docker://docker.io/mbolin491/codex-bazel` Docker image declared in the root `BUILD.bazel`) using cross-compilation to build the macOS artifacts. Then these artifacts are downloaded locally to GitHub's macOS runner so the tests can be executed natively. This is the relevant config that enables this: ``` common:macos --config=remote common:macos --strategy=remote common:macos --strategy=TestRunner=darwin-sandbox,local ``` Because of the remote caching benefits we get from BuildBuddy, these new CI jobs can be extremely fast! For example, consider these two jobs that ran all the tests on Linux x86_64: - Bazel 1m37s https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/20861063212/job/59940545209?pr=8875 - Cargo 9m20s https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/20861063192/job/59940559592?pr=8875 For now, we will continue to run both the Bazel and Cargo jobs for PRs, but once we add support for Windows and running Clippy, we should be able to cutover to using Bazel exclusively for PRs, which should still speed things up considerably. We will probably continue to run the Cargo jobs post-merge for commits that land on `main` as a sanity check. Release builds will also continue to be done by Cargo for now. Earlier attempt at this PR: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8832 Earlier attempt to add support for Buck2, now abandoned: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8504 --------- Co-authored-by: David Zbarsky <dzbarsky@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
zbarsky-openai ·
2026-01-09 11:09:43 -08:00 -
fix: make the find_resource! macro responsible for the absolutize() call (#8884)
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8879 introduced the `find_resource!` macro, but now that I am about to use it in more places, I realize that it should take care of this normalization case for callers. Note the `use $crate::path_absolutize::Absolutize;` line is there so that users of `find_resource!` do not have to explicitly include `path-absolutize` to their own `Cargo.toml`.
Michael Bolin ·
2026-01-07 23:03:43 -08:00 -
feat: introduce find_resource! macro that works with Cargo or Bazel (#8879)
To support Bazelification in https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8875, this PR introduces a new `find_resource!` macro that we use in place of our existing logic in tests that looks for resources relative to the compile-time `CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR` env var. To make this work, we plan to add the following to all `rust_library()` and `rust_test()` Bazel rules in the project: ``` rustc_env = { "BAZEL_PACKAGE": native.package_name(), }, ``` Our new `find_resource!` macro reads this value via `option_env!("BAZEL_PACKAGE")` so that the Bazel package _of the code using `find_resource!`_ is injected into the code expanded from the macro. (If `find_resource()` were a function, then `option_env!("BAZEL_PACKAGE")` would always be `codex-rs/utils/cargo-bin`, which is not what we want.) Note we only consider the `BAZEL_PACKAGE` value when the `RUNFILES_DIR` environment variable is set at runtime, indicating that the test is being run by Bazel. In this case, we have to concatenate the runtime `RUNFILES_DIR` with the compile-time `BAZEL_PACKAGE` value to build the path to the resource. In testing this change, I discovered one funky edge case in `codex-rs/exec-server/tests/common/lib.rs` where we have to _normalize_ (but not canonicalize!) the result from `find_resource!` because the path contains a `common/..` component that does not exist on disk when the test is run under Bazel, so it must be semantically normalized using the [`path-absolutize`](https://crates.io/crates/path-absolutize) crate before it is passed to `dotslash fetch`. Because this new behavior may be non-obvious, this PR also updates `AGENTS.md` to make humans/Codex aware that this API is preferred.
Michael Bolin ·
2026-01-07 18:06:08 -08:00 -
feat: introduce codex-utils-cargo-bin as an alternative to assert_cmd::Command (#8496)
This PR introduces a `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility crate that wraps/replaces our use of `assert_cmd::Command` and `escargot::CargoBuild`. As you can infer from the introduction of `buck_project_root()` in this PR, I am attempting to make it possible to build Codex under [Buck2](https://buck2.build) as well as `cargo`. With Buck2, I hope to achieve faster incremental local builds (largely due to Buck2's [dice](https://buck2.build/docs/insights_and_knowledge/modern_dice/) build strategy, as well as benefits from its local build daemon) as well as faster CI builds if we invest in remote execution and caching. See https://buck2.build/docs/getting_started/what_is_buck2/#why-use-buck2-key-advantages for more details about the performance advantages of Buck2. Buck2 enforces stronger requirements in terms of build and test isolation. It discourages assumptions about absolute paths (which is key to enabling remote execution). Because the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment variables that Cargo provides are absolute paths (which `assert_cmd::Command` reads), this is a problem for Buck2, which is why we need this `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility. My WIP-Buck2 setup sets the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment variables passed to a `rust_test()` build rule as relative paths. `codex-utils-cargo-bin` will resolve these values to absolute paths, when necessary. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/8496). * #8498 * __->__ #8496
Michael Bolin ·
2025-12-23 19:29:32 -08:00