## Summary
This PR adds `memchr` for some low-hanging performance improvements
(namely, in MCP stdio, Ollama streaming, and full message-history
newline counts).
Codex produced the following release benchmarks:
| Operation | Before | After | Speedup |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| MCP 1 MiB chunked line | 2.172 s | 3.984 ms | 545x |
| Ollama 1 MiB chunked line | 1.673 s | 2.790 ms | 600x |
| Count newlines in 10 MiB history | 132.83 ms | 20.05 ms | 6.6x |
With a "real" MCP setup (`ExecutorStdioServerLauncher` started a Python
MCP server, completed `initialize`, requested `tools/list`, and
deserialized a 1 MiB tool description over newline-delimited stdio),
it's about 16x faster end-to-end:
| Branch | 50 calls | Per call |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| `main` | 862.53 ms | 17.25 ms |
| this branch | 53.89 ms | 1.08 ms |
`memchr` is already in our dependency tree and extremely widely used for
this kind of optimized scanning.
## Summary
`cargo test` has entails both running standard Rust tests and doctests.
It turns out that the doctest discovery is fairly slow, and it's a cost
you pay even for crates that don't include any doctests.
This PR disables doctests with `doctest = false` for crates that lack
any doctests.
For the collection of crates below, this speeds up test execution by
>4x.
E.g., before this PR:
```
Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-absolute-path -p codex-utils-cache -p codex-utils-cli -p codex-utils-home-dir -p codex-utils-output-truncation -p codex-utils-path -p codex-utils-string -p codex-utils-template -p codex-utils-elapsed -p codex-utils-json-to-toml
Time (mean ± σ): 1.849 s ± 4.455 s [User: 0.752 s, System: 1.367 s]
Range (min … max): 0.418 s … 14.529 s 10 runs
```
And after:
```
Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-absolute-path -p codex-utils-cache -p codex-utils-cli -p codex-utils-home-dir -p codex-utils-output-truncation -p codex-utils-path -p codex-utils-string -p codex-utils-template -p codex-utils-elapsed -p codex-utils-json-to-toml
Time (mean ± σ): 428.6 ms ± 6.9 ms [User: 187.7 ms, System: 219.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 418.0 ms … 436.8 ms 10 runs
```
For a single crate, with >2x speedup, before:
```
Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-string
Time (mean ± σ): 491.1 ms ± 9.0 ms [User: 229.8 ms, System: 234.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 480.9 ms … 512.0 ms 10 runs
```
And after:
```
Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-string
Time (mean ± σ): 213.9 ms ± 4.3 ms [User: 112.8 ms, System: 84.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 206.8 ms … 221.0 ms 13 runs
```
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Stacked on #16508.
This removes the temporary `codex-core` / `codex-login` re-export shims
from the ownership split and rewrites callsites to import directly from
`codex-model-provider-info`, `codex-models-manager`, `codex-api`,
`codex-protocol`, `codex-feedback`, and `codex-response-debug-context`.
No behavior change intended; this is the mechanical import cleanup layer
split out from the ownership move.
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
This is an alternate PR to solving the same problem as
<https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8227>.
In this PR, when Ollama is used via `--oss` (or via `model_provider =
"ollama"`), we default it to use the Responses format. At runtime, we do
an Ollama version check, and if the version is older than when Responses
support was added to Ollama, we print out a warning.
Because there's no way of configuring the wire api for a built-in
provider, we temporarily add a new `oss_provider`/`model_provider`
called `"ollama-chat"` that will force the chat format.
Once the `"chat"` format is fully removed (see
<https://github.com/openai/codex/discussions/7782>), `ollama-chat` can
be removed as well
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Traut <etraut@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
This adds support for easily running Codex backed by a local Ollama
instance running our new open source models. See
https://github.com/openai/gpt-oss for details.
If you pass in `--oss` you'll be prompted to install/launch ollama, and
it will automatically download the 20b model and attempt to use it.
We'll likely want to expand this with some options later to make the
experience smoother for users who can't run the 20b or want to run the
120b.
Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>