mirror of
https://github.com/pchuan98/codex.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:31:56 +08:00
dev
5 Commits
-
Disable empty Cargo test targets (#21584)
## Summary `cargo test` has entails both running standard Rust tests and doctests. It turns out that the doctest discovery is fairly slow, and it's a cost you pay even for crates that don't include any doctests. This PR disables doctests with `doctest = false` for crates that lack any doctests. For the collection of crates below, this speeds up test execution by >4x. E.g., before this PR: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-absolute-path -p codex-utils-cache -p codex-utils-cli -p codex-utils-home-dir -p codex-utils-output-truncation -p codex-utils-path -p codex-utils-string -p codex-utils-template -p codex-utils-elapsed -p codex-utils-json-to-toml Time (mean ± σ): 1.849 s ± 4.455 s [User: 0.752 s, System: 1.367 s] Range (min … max): 0.418 s … 14.529 s 10 runs ``` And after: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-absolute-path -p codex-utils-cache -p codex-utils-cli -p codex-utils-home-dir -p codex-utils-output-truncation -p codex-utils-path -p codex-utils-string -p codex-utils-template -p codex-utils-elapsed -p codex-utils-json-to-toml Time (mean ± σ): 428.6 ms ± 6.9 ms [User: 187.7 ms, System: 219.7 ms] Range (min … max): 418.0 ms … 436.8 ms 10 runs ``` For a single crate, with >2x speedup, before: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-string Time (mean ± σ): 491.1 ms ± 9.0 ms [User: 229.8 ms, System: 234.9 ms] Range (min … max): 480.9 ms … 512.0 ms 10 runs ``` And after: ``` Benchmark 1: cargo test -p codex-utils-string Time (mean ± σ): 213.9 ms ± 4.3 ms [User: 112.8 ms, System: 84.0 ms] Range (min … max): 206.8 ms … 221.0 ms 13 runs ``` Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Charlie Marsh ·
2026-05-07 15:44:17 -07:00 -
Add turn-scoped environment selections (#18416)
## Summary - add experimental turn/start.environments params for per-turn environment id + cwd selections - pass selections through core protocol ops and resolve them with EnvironmentManager before TurnContext creation - treat omitted selections as default behavior, empty selections as no environment, and non-empty selections as first environment/cwd as the turn primary ## Testing - ran `just fmt` - ran `just write-app-server-schema` - not run: unit tests for this stacked PR --------- Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
starr-openai ·
2026-04-21 17:48:33 -07:00 -
Apply argument comment lint across codex-rs (#14652)
## Why Once the repo-local lint exists, `codex-rs` needs to follow the checked-in convention and CI needs to keep it from drifting. This commit applies the fallback `/*param*/` style consistently across existing positional literal call sites without changing those APIs. The longer-term preference is still to avoid APIs that require comments by choosing clearer parameter types and call shapes. This PR is intentionally the mechanical follow-through for the places where the existing signatures stay in place. After rebasing onto newer `main`, the rollout also had to cover newly introduced `tui_app_server` call sites. That made it clear the first cut of the CI job was too expensive for the common path: it was spending almost as much time installing `cargo-dylint` and re-testing the lint crate as a representative test job spends running product tests. The CI update keeps the full workspace enforcement but trims that extra overhead from ordinary `codex-rs` PRs. ## What changed - keep a dedicated `argument_comment_lint` job in `rust-ci` - mechanically annotate remaining opaque positional literals across `codex-rs` with exact `/*param*/` comments, including the rebased `tui_app_server` call sites that now fall under the lint - keep the checked-in style aligned with the lint policy by using `/*param*/` and leaving string and char literals uncommented - cache `cargo-dylint`, `dylint-link`, and the relevant Cargo registry/git metadata in the lint job - split changed-path detection so the lint crate's own `cargo test` step runs only when `tools/argument-comment-lint/*` or `rust-ci.yml` changes - continue to run the repo wrapper over the `codex-rs` workspace, so product-code enforcement is unchanged Most of the code changes in this commit are intentionally mechanical comment rewrites or insertions driven by the lint itself. ## Verification - `./tools/argument-comment-lint/run.sh --workspace` - `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server -p codex-tui` - parsed `.github/workflows/rust-ci.yml` locally with PyYAML --- * -> #14652 * #14651
Michael Bolin ·
2026-03-16 16:48:15 -07:00 -
app-server: propagate nested experimental gating for AskForApproval::Reject (#14191)
## Summary This change makes `AskForApproval::Reject` gate correctly anywhere it appears inside otherwise-stable app-server protocol types. Previously, experimental gating for `approval_policy: Reject` was handled with request-specific logic in `ClientRequest` detection. That covered a few request params types, but it did not generalize to other nested uses such as `ProfileV2`, `Config`, `ConfigReadResponse`, or `ConfigRequirements`. This PR replaces that ad hoc handling with a generic nested experimental propagation mechanism. ## Testing seeing this when run app-server-test-client without experimental api enabled: ``` initialize response: InitializeResponse { user_agent: "codex-toy-app-server/0.0.0 (Mac OS 26.3.1; arm64) vscode/2.4.36 (codex-toy-app-server; 0.0.0)" } > { > "id": "50244f6a-270a-425d-ace0-e9e98205bde7", > "method": "thread/start", > "params": { > "approvalPolicy": { > "reject": { > "mcp_elicitations": false, > "request_permissions": true, > "rules": false, > "sandbox_approval": true > } > }, > "baseInstructions": null, > "config": null, > "cwd": null, > "developerInstructions": null, > "dynamicTools": null, > "ephemeral": null, > "experimentalRawEvents": false, > "mockExperimentalField": null, > "model": null, > "modelProvider": null, > "persistExtendedHistory": false, > "personality": null, > "sandbox": null, > "serviceName": null > } > } < { < "error": { < "code": -32600, < "message": "askForApproval.reject requires experimentalApi capability" < }, < "id": "50244f6a-270a-425d-ace0-e9e98205bde7" < } [verified] thread/start rejected approvalPolicy=Reject without experimentalApi ``` --------- Co-authored-by: celia-oai <celia@openai.com>Dylan Hurd ·
2026-03-11 12:33:08 -07:00 -
feat: experimental flags (#10231)
## Problem being solved - We need a single, reliable way to mark app-server API surface as experimental so that: 1. the runtime can reject experimental usage unless the client opts in 2. generated TS/JSON schemas can exclude experimental methods/fields for stable clients. Right now that’s easy to drift or miss when done ad-hoc. ## How to declare experimental methods and fields - **Experimental method**: add `#[experimental("method/name")]` to the `ClientRequest` variant in `client_request_definitions!`. - **Experimental field**: on the params struct, derive `ExperimentalApi` and annotate the field with `#[experimental("method/name.field")]` + set `inspect_params: true` for the method variant so `ClientRequest::experimental_reason()` inspects params for experimental fields. ## How the macro solves it - The new derive macro lives in `codex-rs/codex-experimental-api-macros/src/lib.rs` and is used via `#[derive(ExperimentalApi)]` plus `#[experimental("reason")]` attributes. - **Structs**: - Generates `ExperimentalApi::experimental_reason(&self)` that checks only annotated fields. - The “presence” check is type-aware: - `Option<T>`: `is_some_and(...)` recursively checks inner. - `Vec`/`HashMap`/`BTreeMap`: must be non-empty. - `bool`: must be `true`. - Other types: considered present (returns `true`). - Registers each experimental field in an `inventory` with `(type_name, serialized field name, reason)` and exposes `EXPERIMENTAL_FIELDS` for that type. Field names are converted from `snake_case` to `camelCase` for schema/TS filtering. - **Enums**: - Generates an exhaustive `match` returning `Some(reason)` for annotated variants and `None` otherwise (no wildcard arm). - **Wiring**: - Runtime gating uses `ExperimentalApi::experimental_reason()` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs` to reject requests unless `InitializeParams.capabilities.experimental_api == true`. - Schema/TS export filters use the inventory list and `EXPERIMENTAL_CLIENT_METHODS` from `client_request_definitions!` to strip experimental methods/fields when `experimental_api` is false.jif-oai ·
2026-02-02 11:06:50 +00:00