## Why
Once #30114 publishes zsh independently, regular Rust releases should
reuse that protected, versioned artifact set instead of rebuilding
identical zsh binaries for every Codex version. Keeping the zsh release
tag explicit in the workflow also makes future artifact upgrades
deliberate and easy to review.
This PR assumes the first standalone artifact release will be published
as `codex-zsh-v0.1.0` before this change lands.
## What changed
- Added `CODEX_ZSH_RELEASE_TAG` near the top of
`.github/workflows/rust-release.yml`, initially pinned to
`codex-zsh-v0.1.0`.
- Download the standalone release’s generated `codex-zsh` DotSlash
manifest before assembling Linux and macOS Codex packages.
- Added a `--zsh-manifest` package-builder override so release packaging
fetches the matching target archive and verifies the size and SHA-256
digest recorded in that manifest.
- Removed the reusable zsh build job from regular Rust releases.
- Stopped copying zsh archives into each Rust release and stopped
regenerating a zsh DotSlash manifest there.
Windows packaging remains unchanged because the patched zsh resource is
only shipped for supported Unix targets.
## Testing
- Added package-helper coverage that supplies a standalone manifest
override and verifies the extracted zsh bytes.
- Ran the `scripts/codex_package` unit test suite.
- Validated `.github/scripts/build-codex-package-archive.sh` with `bash
-n`.
## Why
Release packaging should be a staging step once release binaries have
already been built and signed. The Windows release job was downloading
and signing `codex-command-runner.exe` and
`codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe`, but `scripts/build_codex_package.py`
still rebuilt those helpers while creating the package archives.
That makes the package step slower and, more importantly, risks putting
helper binaries in the archive that were produced after the signing
step. Linux had the same shape for package resources: `bwrap` could be
rebuilt by the package builder instead of being passed in as a prebuilt
release artifact.
This builds on #23752, which fixes `.tar.zst` creation when Windows
runners rely on the repository DotSlash `zstd` wrapper.
## What changed
- Add explicit prebuilt resource inputs to the Codex package builder:
- `--bwrap-bin`
- `--codex-command-runner-bin`
- `--codex-windows-sandbox-setup-bin`
- Make `.github/scripts/build-codex-package-archive.sh` pass resource
binaries from the release output directory when they are already
present.
- Build Linux `bwrap` for app-server release jobs too, so app-server
package creation does not invoke Cargo just to supply the package
resource.
- Keep macOS package creation as a no-Cargo path when `--entrypoint-bin`
is provided, since macOS packages have no resource binaries.
- Add unit coverage showing prebuilt macOS, Linux, and Windows package
inputs result in no source-built binaries.
## Verification
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s scripts/codex_package -p 'test_*.py'`
- `python3 -m py_compile scripts/codex_package/*.py`
- `bash -n .github/scripts/build-codex-package-archive.sh`
- Dry-ran Linux and Windows package builds with fake prebuilt resources
and a nonexistent Cargo path to verify the package builder did not
invoke Cargo.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/23759).
* #23760
* __->__ #23759
## Summary
DotSlash should resolve the same canonical package archives used by
standalone installers and npm platform packages, rather than continuing
to point at single-binary zstd artifacts or the older Linux bundle
archive.
This updates the Codex CLI and `codex-app-server` DotSlash release
config entries to match `codex-package-<target>.tar.gz` and
`codex-app-server-package-<target>.tar.gz`, with paths that select
`bin/codex` or `bin/codex-app-server` inside the extracted package. The
other helper outputs stay on their existing per-binary artifacts for
now.
## Test plan
- `python3 -m json.tool .github/dotslash-config.json > /dev/null`
- Ran a Python regex smoke test that checked every updated `codex` and
`codex-app-server` platform entry against the archive names emitted by
`.github/scripts/build-codex-package-archive.sh`.
## Why
Release CI already builds the Codex entrypoints before staging
artifacts, and the package builder can now package those prebuilt
binaries directly. The workflow should produce package-shaped sidecar
archives from the same staged entrypoints that downstream distribution
channels will eventually consume, without rebuilding `codex` or
`codex-app-server` inside the packaging step.
This intentionally does **not** publish the new package archives as
GitHub Release assets yet. The archives are kept with workflow artifacts
until npm, Homebrew, `install.sh`, winget, and related consumers are
ready to switch over.
## What changed
- Adds a `Build Codex package archive` step to
`.github/workflows/rust-release.yml` after target artifacts are staged.
- Runs `scripts/build_codex_package.py` for both release bundles:
- `primary` builds `codex-package-${TARGET}.tar.gz` with `--variant
codex`.
- `app-server` builds `codex-app-server-package-${TARGET}.tar.gz` with
`--variant codex-app-server`.
- Passes `--entrypoint-bin target/${TARGET}/release/<entrypoint>` so
packages contain the entrypoint already built by the workflow.
- Deletes both package archive names before the final GitHub Release
upload so they remain workflow artifacts only for now.
## Verification
- Parsed `.github/workflows/rust-release.yml` with Ruby's YAML loader.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/23582).
* #23596
* __->__ #23582
Michael Bolin ·