* Enable instrumentation by default * Update samples * Optimization when span is not recording * Address Copilot comments * Revert uv.lock * Add warning * Formatting * Fix mypy * Add disable_instrumentation() with sticky user-intent semantics Add a public disable_instrumentation() entry point so users can explicitly opt out of Agent Framework telemetry, with a sticky-disable flag that makes the user's intent "leading" — no framework code path (foundry's configure_azure_monitor, configure_otel_providers, enable_instrumentation, enable_sensitive_telemetry, or direct OBSERVABILITY_SETTINGS.enable_* writes) can re-enable instrumentation until the user explicitly clears the disable with enable_instrumentation(force=True) / enable_sensitive_telemetry(force=True). Also addresses the two remaining unresolved review threads on the PR: 1. test_observability_settings_defaults_instrumentation_true pins the new "ENABLE_INSTRUMENTATION defaults to True when env unset" behavior. 2. test_enable_instrumentation_reads_env_sensitive_data restores coverage for the post-import load_dotenv() fallback path. Implementation: - ObservabilitySettings.enable_instrumentation / enable_sensitive_data become properties backed by _enable_*. While _user_disabled is True, the getters return False and the setters drop True writes (defense in depth so third- party writes can't subvert the disable). - Public is_user_disabled read-only property lets integrations (e.g. foundry's configure_azure_monitor) cheaply check the disable state without poking at privates. - enable_instrumentation() and enable_sensitive_telemetry() short-circuit with an info log when disabled; gain a force=True kwarg that clears the disable. - configure_otel_providers() still creates providers / exporters / views so a later force-enable can use them, but logs an info message when called while disabled. - Foundry's FoundryChatClient.configure_azure_monitor and FoundryAgent.configure_azure_monitor early-return when the user has disabled, so Azure Monitor's global providers aren't installed unnecessarily. Tests: 11 new tests covering default-on, env re-read at call time, sticky behavior against each re-enable surface (enable_instrumentation, enable_sensitive_telemetry, configure_otel_providers, direct attribute writes), force=True override, re-arming the disable, and the __all__ export. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: document disable_instrumentation() and force=True paths Add a "Disabling instrumentation" section to the observability sample README that walks through: - The distinction between the ENABLE_INSTRUMENTATION env var (initial, non-sticky) and disable_instrumentation() (process-wide, sticky). - Why the sticky semantics matter: framework integrations like FoundryChatClient.configure_azure_monitor() can call enable_instrumentation() as part of their setup, and the user's opt-out needs to win. - All five surfaces guarded by the sticky disable (property reads, public enable functions, configure_otel_providers, direct attribute writes, is_user_disabled-aware integrations). - The force=True escape hatch on both enable_instrumentation() and enable_sensitive_telemetry(). - How third-party integrations should consult OBSERVABILITY_SETTINGS.is_user_disabled. - The limits of the disable (does not tear down existing providers / in-flight spans / third-party instrumentation, does not persist across processes). Cross-links the new section from the ENABLE_INSTRUMENTATION row in the env vars table. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: soften disable_instrumentation() overclaim about telemetry guarantees Replace 'no telemetry will be emitted no matter what' (which is too strong, since callers can still pass force=True or mutate private attributes) with language framing the disable as a user-intent contract that library and framework code is expected to honor: the framework actively short-circuits the public enable paths, force=True and private-attribute writes are acknowledged as out-of-contract escape hatches that integrations should not use on the user's behalf. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: correct observability Dependencies section - opentelemetry-sdk is no longer a hard dependency; it is lazily imported by create_resource(), create_metric_views(), and configure_otel_providers() with a clear ImportError when missing. Day-to-day instrumentation works with opentelemetry-api alone provided some other component configures the global OpenTelemetry providers (Azure Monitor, an APM agent, application bootstrap, etc.). - opentelemetry-semantic-conventions-ai is no longer used anywhere in the source; remove it from the listed dependencies. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: replace stale observability migration guide with current PR's only relevant migration The old guide documented the move away from setup_observability(otlp_endpoint=...) which was an earlier-release API change unrelated to this PR and stale enough that it's more confusing than helpful at this point. Replace it with a short note on the single migration this PR introduces: callers of enable_instrumentation(enable_sensitive_data=True) should switch to enable_sensitive_telemetry(). Cross-link to the Disabling instrumentation section for the rare 'force on without enabling sensitive data' use case where enable_instrumentation() still applies. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Eduard van Valkenburg <eavanvalkenburg@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Get Started with Microsoft Agent Framework
Highlights
- Flexible Agent Framework: build, orchestrate, and deploy AI agents and multi-agent systems
- Multi-Agent Orchestration: Group chat, sequential, concurrent, and handoff patterns
- Plugin Ecosystem: Extend with native functions, OpenAPI, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and more
- LLM Support: OpenAI, Foundry, Anthropic, and more
- Runtime Support: In-process and distributed agent execution
- Multimodal: Text, vision, and function calling
- Cross-Platform: .NET and Python implementations
Quick Install
pip install agent-framework-core
# Optional: Add Azure AI Foundry integration
pip install agent-framework-foundry
# Optional: Add OpenAI integration
pip install agent-framework-openai
Supported Platforms:
- Python: 3.10+
- OS: Windows, macOS, Linux
1. Setup API Keys
Depending on the client you want to use, there are various environment variables you can set to configure the chat clients. This can be done in the environment itself, or with a .env file in your project root, some examples of environment variables include:
FOUNDRY_PROJECT_ENDPOINT=...
FOUNDRY_MODEL=...
...
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-...
OPENAI_CHAT_COMPLETION_MODEL=...
OPENAI_CHAT_MODEL=...
...
AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY=...
AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT=...
AZURE_OPENAI_MODEL=...
You can also override environment variables by explicitly passing configuration parameters to the chat client constructor:
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
client = OpenAIChatClient(
api_key="",
model="",
)
See the following getting started samples for more information.
2. Create a Simple Agent
Create agents and invoke them directly:
import asyncio
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
agent = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
instructions="""
1) A robot may not injure a human being...
2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings...
3) A robot must protect its own existence...
Give me the TLDR in exactly 5 words.
"""
)
result = asyncio.run(agent.run("Summarize the Three Laws of Robotics"))
print(result)
# Output: Protect humans, obey, self-preserve, prioritized.
3. Directly Use Chat Clients (No Agent Required)
You can use the chat client classes directly for advanced workflows:
import asyncio
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
from agent_framework import Message, Role
async def main():
client = OpenAIChatClient()
response = await client.get_response([
Message("system", ["You are a helpful assistant."]),
Message("user", ["Write a haiku about Agent Framework."])
])
print(response.messages[0].text)
"""
Output:
Agents work in sync,
Framework threads through each task—
Code sparks collaboration.
"""
asyncio.run(main())
4. Build an Agent with Tools and Functions
Enhance your agent with custom tools and function calling:
import asyncio
from typing import Annotated
from random import randint
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
def get_weather(
location: Annotated[str, "The location to get the weather for."],
) -> str:
"""Get the weather for a given location."""
conditions = ["sunny", "cloudy", "rainy", "stormy"]
return f"The weather in {location} is {conditions[randint(0, 3)]} with a high of {randint(10, 30)}°C."
def get_menu_specials() -> str:
"""Get today's menu specials."""
return """
Special Soup: Clam Chowder
Special Salad: Cobb Salad
Special Drink: Chai Tea
"""
async def main():
agent = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
instructions="You are a helpful assistant that can provide weather and restaurant information.",
tools=[get_weather, get_menu_specials]
)
response = await agent.run("What's the weather in Amsterdam and what are today's specials?")
print(response)
# Output:
# The weather in Amsterdam is sunny with a high of 22°C. Today's specials include
# Clam Chowder soup, Cobb Salad, and Chai Tea as the special drink.
asyncio.run(main())
You can explore additional agent samples here.
5. Multi-Agent Orchestration
Coordinate multiple agents to collaborate on complex tasks using orchestration patterns:
import asyncio
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
async def main():
# Create specialized agents
writer = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
name="Writer",
instructions="You are a creative content writer. Generate and refine slogans based on feedback."
)
reviewer = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
name="Reviewer",
instructions="You are a critical reviewer. Provide detailed feedback on proposed slogans."
)
# Sequential workflow: Writer creates, Reviewer provides feedback
task = "Create a slogan for a new electric SUV that is affordable and fun to drive."
# Step 1: Writer creates initial slogan
initial_result = await writer.run(task)
print(f"Writer: {initial_result}")
# Step 2: Reviewer provides feedback
feedback_request = f"Please review this slogan: {initial_result}"
feedback = await reviewer.run(feedback_request)
print(f"Reviewer: {feedback}")
# Step 3: Writer refines based on feedback
refinement_request = f"Please refine this slogan based on the feedback: {initial_result}\nFeedback: {feedback}"
final_result = await writer.run(refinement_request)
print(f"Final Slogan: {final_result}")
# Example Output:
# Writer: "Charge Forward: Affordable Adventure Awaits!"
# Reviewer: "Good energy, but 'Charge Forward' is overused in EV marketing..."
# Final Slogan: "Power Up Your Adventure: Premium Feel, Smart Price!"
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Note: Sequential, Concurrent, Group Chat, Handoff, and Magentic orchestrations are available. See examples in orchestration samples.
More Examples & Samples
- Getting Started with Agents: Basic agent creation and tool usage
- Chat Client Examples: Direct chat client usage patterns
- Foundry Integration: Foundry integration
- Workflows Samples: Advanced multi-agent patterns