* fix(devui): add created_at to custom output item events for correct workflow timings (#5545) CustomResponseOutputItemAddedEvent and CustomResponseOutputItemDoneEvent lacked a created_at field, causing the frontend to synthesize timestamps using integer-second precision with a forced +1s minimum gap between events. This made instant workflows appear to take 3+ seconds in the DevUI timeline. Fix: - Add optional created_at: float | None field to both custom event models - Populate created_at=float(time.time()) in the mapper for executor_invoked, executor_completed, and executor_failed events Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(devui): use event created_at for accurate workflow timeline timings workflow-view.tsx synthesized _uiTimestamp using Math.max(baseTimestamp, lastTimestamp + 1) with integer-second precision, forcing a minimum 1-second gap between every sequential event. This made instant workflows appear to take several seconds in the DevUI timeline. The fix prefers event.created_at (a float Unix timestamp populated by the backend mapper for all executor events) and only falls back to the synthetic timestamp when created_at is absent. This matches the pattern already used in devuiStore.ts:addDebugEvent. Added a regression test in test_mapper.py verifying that the mapper attaches created_at to all executor lifecycle events (invoked, completed, failed). Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(devui): address review feedback for issue #5545 - Read data.timestamp (ISO string) and response.created_at in addition to top-level created_at when deriving _uiTimestamp, so response.workflow_event.completed events get a real server timestamp instead of a synthesized one - Change uniqueTimestamp tiebreaker: when a real server timestamp is available use Math.max(eventTimestamp, lastTimestamp) rather than lastTimestamp + 1, eliminating artificial 1-second gaps while still preserving monotonic ordering - Apply the same fix in the HIL streaming path (second setOpenAIEvents call in workflow-view.tsx) - Add assert event.created_at > 0 to regression test to guard against zero or negative timestamps - Add test_custom_output_item_event_models_have_created_at_field model- level test so removing the field produces a clear named failure rather than a downstream ValidationError Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(#5545): guard NaN timestamps, fix fallback ID uniqueness, add regression tests - workflow-view.tsx (×2): Wrap data.timestamp ISO→number conversion in a Number.isFinite() guard. Python's datetime.now().isoformat() emits microseconds without a trailing 'Z' (e.g. '2024-01-15T12:34:56.123456'), which some JS engines cannot parse, returning NaN. NaN !== undefined is true so the eventTimestamp !== undefined guard did not catch it, poisoning _uiTimestamp and resetting the monotonic ordering seed (NaN || 0 → 0). - execution-timeline.tsx: Replace uiTimestamp in the fallback syntheticItemId with the per-executor runNumber counter. Two runs of the same executor within the same second previously received identical _uiTimestamp values and therefore identical syntheticItemIds, causing their output buckets, state, and run entries to collide (execution-timeline.tsx:360–408). - Add missing test_workflow_timings_bug.py source file (only a stale .pyc existed). Three regression tests: · test_custom_event_models_lack_created_at_field – model field guard · test_workflow_executor_events_lack_created_at – mapper populates created_at · test_rapid_workflow_events_have_no_top_level_timestamps – confirms data.timestamp format that requires the frontend NaN guard Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Address review feedback for #5545: Python: [Bug]: Workflow timings in DevUI are incorrect * devui: move timing regression tests into test_mapper.py, remove dedicated bug file - Delete test_workflow_timings_bug.py; tests belong in existing module files - The two tests already present in test_mapper.py (test_executor_events_carry_created_at_timestamp and test_custom_output_item_event_models_have_created_at_field) cover the same ground as the first two tests in the deleted file - Add test_executor_completed_maps_to_output_item_done_event to test_mapper.py, replacing the third test from the deleted file with a generic, issue-agnostic name and docstring Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Address review feedback for #5545: review comment fixes --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Get Started with Microsoft Agent Framework for Python Developers
Quick Install
We recommend two common installation paths depending on your use case.
1. Development mode
If you are exploring or developing locally, install the entire framework with all sub-packages:
pip install agent-framework
This installs the core and every integration package, making sure that all features are available without additional steps. This is the simplest way to get started.
2. Selective install
If you only need specific integrations, you can install at a more granular level. This keeps dependencies lighter and focuses on what you actually plan to use. Some examples:
# Core only
# includes Azure OpenAI and OpenAI support by default
# also includes workflows and orchestrations
pip install agent-framework-core
# Core + Azure AI Foundry integration
pip install agent-framework-foundry
# Core + Microsoft Copilot Studio integration (preview package)
pip install agent-framework-copilotstudio --pre
# Core + both Microsoft Copilot Studio and Azure AI Foundry integration
pip install --pre agent-framework-copilotstudio agent-framework-foundry
This selective approach is useful when you know which integrations you need, and it is the recommended way to set up lightweight environments. Released packages such as agent-framework, agent-framework-core, and agent-framework-foundry no longer require --pre, while preview connectors such as agent-framework-copilotstudio still do.
Supported Platforms:
- Python: 3.10+
- OS: Windows, macOS, Linux
1. Setup API Keys
Set as environment variables, or create a .env file at your project root:
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-...
OPENAI_MODEL=...
...
AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY=...
AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT=...
AZURE_OPENAI_MODEL=...
...
FOUNDRY_PROJECT_ENDPOINT=...
FOUNDRY_MODEL=...
For the generic OpenAI clients (OpenAIChatClient and OpenAIChatCompletionClient), configuration
resolves in this order:
- Explicit Azure inputs such as
credentialorazure_endpoint OPENAI_API_KEY/ explicit OpenAI API-key parameters- Azure environment fallback such as
AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINTandAZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY
This means mixed shells default to OpenAI when OPENAI_API_KEY is present. To force Azure routing,
pass an explicit Azure input such as credential=AzureCliCredential().
You can also override environment variables by explicitly passing configuration parameters to the chat client constructor:
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
client = OpenAIChatClient(
api_key='',
azure_endpoint='',
model='',
api_version='',
)
See the following setup guide for more information.
2. Create a Simple Agent
Create agents and invoke them directly:
import asyncio
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
async def main():
agent = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
instructions="""
1) A robot may not injure a human being...
2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings...
3) A robot must protect its own existence...
Give me the TLDR in exactly 5 words.
"""
)
result = await agent.run("Summarize the Three Laws of Robotics")
print(result)
asyncio.run(main())
# Output: Protect humans, obey, self-preserve, prioritized.
3. Directly Use Chat Clients (No Agent Required)
You can use the chat client classes directly for advanced workflows:
import asyncio
from agent_framework import Message
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
async def main():
client = OpenAIChatClient()
messages = [
Message("system", ["You are a helpful assistant."]),
Message("user", ["Write a haiku about Agent Framework."])
]
response = await client.get_response(messages)
print(response.messages[0].text)
"""
Output:
Agents work in sync,
Framework threads through each task—
Code sparks collaboration.
"""
asyncio.run(main())
4. Build an Agent with Tools and Functions
Enhance your agent with custom tools and function calling:
import asyncio
from typing import Annotated
from random import randint
from pydantic import Field
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
def get_weather(
location: Annotated[str, Field(description="The location to get the weather for.")],
) -> str:
"""Get the weather for a given location."""
conditions = ["sunny", "cloudy", "rainy", "stormy"]
return f"The weather in {location} is {conditions[randint(0, 3)]} with a high of {randint(10, 30)}°C."
def get_menu_specials() -> str:
"""Get today's menu specials."""
return """
Special Soup: Clam Chowder
Special Salad: Cobb Salad
Special Drink: Chai Tea
"""
async def main():
agent = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
instructions="You are a helpful assistant that can provide weather and restaurant information.",
tools=[get_weather, get_menu_specials]
)
response = await agent.run("What's the weather in Amsterdam and what are today's specials?")
print(response)
"""
Output:
The weather in Amsterdam is sunny with a high of 22°C. Today's specials include
Clam Chowder soup, Cobb Salad, and Chai Tea as the special drink.
"""
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
You can explore additional agent samples here.
5. Multi-Agent Orchestration
Coordinate multiple agents to collaborate on complex tasks using orchestration patterns:
import asyncio
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
async def main():
# Create specialized agents
writer = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
name="Writer",
instructions="You are a creative content writer. Generate and refine slogans based on feedback."
)
reviewer = Agent(
client=OpenAIChatClient(),
name="Reviewer",
instructions="You are a critical reviewer. Provide detailed feedback on proposed slogans."
)
# Sequential workflow: Writer creates, Reviewer provides feedback
task = "Create a slogan for a new electric SUV that is affordable and fun to drive."
# Step 1: Writer creates initial slogan
initial_result = await writer.run(task)
print(f"Writer: {initial_result}")
# Step 2: Reviewer provides feedback
feedback_request = f"Please review this slogan: {initial_result}"
feedback = await reviewer.run(feedback_request)
print(f"Reviewer: {feedback}")
# Step 3: Writer refines based on feedback
refinement_request = f"Please refine this slogan based on the feedback: {initial_result}\nFeedback: {feedback}"
final_result = await writer.run(refinement_request)
print(f"Final Slogan: {final_result}")
# Example Output:
# Writer: "Charge Forward: Affordable Adventure Awaits!"
# Reviewer: "Good energy, but 'Charge Forward' is overused in EV marketing..."
# Final Slogan: "Power Up Your Adventure: Premium Feel, Smart Price!"
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
For more advanced orchestration patterns including Sequential, Concurrent, Group Chat, Handoff, and Magentic orchestrations, see the orchestration samples.
More Examples & Samples
- Getting Started with Agents: Basic agent creation and tool usage
- Chat Client Examples: Direct chat client usage patterns
- Foundry Integration: Microsoft Foundry integration
- Workflow Samples: Advanced multi-agent patterns
Agent Framework Documentation
- Agent Framework Repository
- Python Package Documentation
- .NET Package Documentation
- Design Documents
- Learn docs are coming soon.