* .NET: Add Microsoft Fabric sample #3674 (#4230) Co-authored-by: Chris <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * Python: Phase 2: Embedding clients for Ollama, Bedrock, and Azure AI Inference (#4207) * Phase 2: Embedding clients for Ollama, Bedrock, and Azure AI Inference Add embedding client implementations to existing provider packages: - OllamaEmbeddingClient: Text embeddings via Ollama's embed API - BedrockEmbeddingClient: Text embeddings via Amazon Titan on Bedrock - AzureAIInferenceEmbeddingClient: Text and image embeddings via Azure AI Inference, supporting Content | str input with separate model IDs for text (AZURE_AI_INFERENCE_EMBEDDING_MODEL_ID) and image (AZURE_AI_INFERENCE_IMAGE_EMBEDDING_MODEL_ID) endpoints Additional changes: - Rename EmbeddingCoT -> EmbeddingT, EmbeddingOptionsCoT -> EmbeddingOptionsT - Add otel_provider_name passthrough to all embedding clients - Register integration pytest marker in all packages - Add lazy-loading namespace exports for Ollama and Bedrock embeddings - Add image embedding sample using Cohere-embed-v3-english - Add azure-ai-inference dependency to azure-ai package Part of #1188 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix mypy duplicate name and ruff lint issues - Rename second 'vector' variable to 'img_vector' in image embedding loop - Combine nested with statements in tests - Remove unused result assignments in tests Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * updates from feedback * Fix CI failures in embedding usage handling - Fix Azure AI embedding mypy issues by normalizing vectors to list[float], safely accumulating optional usage token fields, and filtering None entries before constructing GeneratedEmbeddings - Avoid Bandit false positive by initializing usage details as an empty dict - Update OpenAI embedding tests to assert canonical usage keys (input_token_count/total_token_count) Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * [Purview] Mark responses as responses and fix epoch bug for python long overflow (#4225) * .NET: Support InvokeMcpTool for declarative workflows (#4204) * Initial implementation of InvokeMcpTool in declarative workflow * Cleaned up sample implementation * Updated sample comments. * Added missing executor routing attribute * Fix PR comments. * Updated based on PR comments. * Updated based on PR comments. * Removed unnecessary using statement. * Update Python package versions to rc2 (#4258) - Bump core and azure-ai to 1.0.0rc2 - Bump preview packages to 1.0.0b260225 - Update dependencies to >=1.0.0rc2 - Add CHANGELOG entries for changes since rc1 - Update uv.lock Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * .NET: Fixing issue where OpenTelemetry span is never exported in .NET in-process workflow execution (#4196) * 1. Add reproduction test for issue #4155: workflow.run Activity never stopped in streaming OffThread path The WorkflowRunActivity_IsStopped_Streaming_OffThread test demonstrates that the workflow.run OpenTelemetry Activity created in StreamingRunEventStream.RunLoopAsync is started but never stopped when using the OffThread/Default streaming execution. The background run loop keeps running after event consumption completes, so the using Activity? declaration never disposes until explicit StopAsync() is called. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> 2. Fix workflow.run Activity never stopped in streaming OffThread execution (#4155) The workflow.run OpenTelemetry Activity in StreamingRunEventStream.RunLoopAsync was scoped to the method lifetime via 'using'. Since the run loop only exits on cancellation, the Activity was never stopped/exported until explicit disposal. Fix: Remove 'using' and explicitly dispose the Activity when the workflow reaches Idle status (all supersteps complete). A safety-net disposal in the finally block handles cancellation and error paths. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Add root-level workflow.session activity spanning run loop lifetime\n\nImplements two-level telemetry hierarchy per PR feedback from lokitoth:\n- workflow.session: spans the entire run loop / stream lifetime\n- workflow_invoke: per input-to-halt cycle, nested within the session\n\nThis ensures the session activity stays open across multiple turns,\nwhile individual run activities are created and disposed per cycle.\n\nAlso fixes linkedSource CancellationTokenSource disposal leak in\nStreamingRunEventStream (added using declaration)." * Address Copilot review: fix Activity/CTS disposal, rename activity, add error tag\n\n1. LockstepRunEventStream: Remove 'using' from Activity in async iterator\n and manually dispose in finally block (fixes #4155 pattern). Also dispose\n linkedSource CTS in finally to prevent leak.\n2. Tags.cs: Add ErrorMessage (\"error.message\") tag for runtime errors,\n distinct from BuildErrorMessage (\"build.error.message\").\n3. ActivityNames: Rename WorkflowRun from \"workflow_invoke\" to \"workflow.run\"\n for cross-language consistency.\n4. WorkflowTelemetryContext: Fix XML doc to say \"outer/parent span\" instead\n of \"root-level span\".\n5. ObservabilityTests: Assert WorkflowSession absence when DisableWorkflowRun\n is true.\n6. WorkflowRunActivityStopTests: Fix streaming test race by disposing\n StreamingRun before asserting activities are stopped.\n7. StreamingRunEventStream/LockstepRunEventStream: Use Tags.ErrorMessage\n instead of Tags.BuildErrorMessage for runtime error events." * Review fixes: revert workflow_invoke rename, use 'using' for linkedSource, move SessionStarted earlier\n\n- Revert ActivityNames.WorkflowRun back to \"workflow_invoke\" (OTEL semantic convention contract)\n- Use 'using' declaration for linkedSource CTS in LockstepRunEventStream (no timing sensitivity)\n- Move SessionStarted event before WaitForInputAsync in StreamingRunEventStream to match Lockstep behavior" * Improve naming and comments in WorkflowRunActivityStopTests" * Prevent session Activity.Current leak in lockstep mode, add nesting test Save and restore Activity.Current in LockstepRunEventStream.Start() so the session activity doesn't leak into caller code via AsyncLocal. Re-establish Activity.Current = sessionActivity before creating the run activity in TakeEventStreamAsync to preserve parent-child nesting. Add test verifying app activities after RunAsync are not parented under the session, and that the workflow_invoke activity nests under the session." * Fix stale XML doc: WorkflowRun -> WorkflowInvoke in ObservabilityTests --------- Co-authored-by: alliscode <bentho@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Python / .NET Samples - Restructure and Improve Samples (Feature Branc… (#4092) * Python: .NET Samples - Restructure and Improve Samples (Feature Branch) (#4091) * Moved by agent (#4094) * Fix readme links * .NET Samples - Create `04-hosting` learning path step (#4098) * Agent move * Agent reorderd * Remove A2A section from README Removed A2A section from the Getting Started README. * Agent fixed links * Fix broken sample links in durable-agents README (#4101) * Initial plan * Fix broken internal links in documentation Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * Revert template link changes; keep only durable-agents README fix Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * .NET Samples - Create `03-workflows` learning path step (#4102) * Fix solution project path * Python: Fix broken markdown links to repo resources (outside /docs) (#4105) * Initial plan * Fix broken markdown links to repo resources Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * Update README to rename .NET Workflows Samples section --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * .NET Samples - Create `02-agents` learning path step (#4107) * .NET: Fix broken relative link in GroupChatToolApproval README (#4108) * Initial plan * Fix broken link in GroupChatToolApproval README Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * Update labeler configuration for workflow samples * .NET - Reorder Agents samples to start from Step01 instead of Step04 (#4110) * Fix solution * Resolve new sample paths * Move new AgentSkills and AgentWithMemory_Step04 samples * Fix link * Fix readme path * fix: update stale dotnet/samples/Durable path reference in AGENTS.md Co-authored-by: crickman <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> * Moved new sample * Update solution * Resolve merge (new sample) * Sync to new sample - FoundryAgents_Step21_BingCustomSearch * Updated README * .NET Samples - Configuration Naming Update (#4149) * .NET: Restore AzureFunctions index parity with ConsoleApps under DurableAgents samples (#4221) * Clean-up `05_host_your_agent` * Config setting consistency * Refine samples * AGENTS.md * Move new samples * Re-order samples * Move new project and fixup solution * Fixup model config * Fix up new UT project --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Python: Fix Bedrock embedding test stub missing meta attribute (#4287) * Fix Bedrock embedding test stub missing meta attribute * Increase test coverage so gate passes * Python: (ag-ui): fix approval payloads being re-processed on subsequent conversation turns (#4232) * Fix ag-ui tool call issue * Safe json fix * Python: Update workflow orchestration samples to use AzureOpenAIResponsesClient (#4285) * Update workflow orchestration samples to use AzureOpenAIResponsesClient * Fix broken link * Move scripts to scripts folder --------- Co-authored-by: Roger Barreto <19890735+rogerbarreto@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Chris <66376200+crickman@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Eduard van Valkenburg <eavanvalkenburg@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Rishabh Chawla <rishabhchawla1995@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Peter Ibekwe <109177538+peibekwe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dmytro Struk <13853051+dmytrostruk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ben Thomas <ben.thomas@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: alliscode <bentho@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <35585003+moonbox3@users.noreply.github.com>
18 KiB
Workflows Getting Started Samples
Installation
Microsoft Agent Framework Workflows support ships with the core agent-framework or agent-framework-core package, so no extra installation step is required.
To install with visualization support:
pip install agent-framework[viz] --pre
To export visualization images you also need to install GraphViz.
Samples Overview
Foundational Concepts - Start Here
Begin with the _start-here folder in order. These three samples introduce the core ideas of executors, edges, agents in workflows, and streaming.
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Executors and Edges | _start-here/step1_executors_and_edges.py | Minimal workflow with basic executors and edges |
| Agents in a Workflow | _start-here/step2_agents_in_a_workflow.py | Introduces adding Agents as nodes; calling agents inside a workflow |
| Streaming (Basics) | _start-here/step3_streaming.py | Extends workflows with event streaming |
Once comfortable with these, explore the rest of the samples below.
Samples Overview (by directory)
agents
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Azure Chat Agents (Streaming) | agents/azure_chat_agents_streaming.py | Add Azure Chat agents as edges and handle streaming events |
| Azure AI Agents (Streaming) | agents/azure_ai_agents_streaming.py | Add Azure AI agents as edges and handle streaming events |
| Azure AI Agents (Shared Thread) | agents/azure_ai_agents_with_shared_session.py | Share a common message session between multiple Azure AI agents in a workflow |
| Custom Agent Executors | agents/custom_agent_executors.py | Create executors to handle agent run methods |
| Workflow as Agent (Reflection Pattern) | agents/workflow_as_agent_reflection_pattern.py | Wrap a workflow so it can behave like an agent (reflection pattern) |
| Workflow as Agent + HITL | agents/workflow_as_agent_human_in_the_loop.py | Extend workflow-as-agent with human-in-the-loop capability |
| Workflow as Agent with Session | agents/workflow_as_agent_with_session.py | Use AgentSession to maintain conversation history across workflow-as-agent invocations |
| Workflow as Agent kwargs | agents/workflow_as_agent_kwargs.py | Pass custom context (data, user tokens) via kwargs through workflow.as_agent() to @ai_function tools |
checkpoint
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Checkpoint & Resume | checkpoint/checkpoint_with_resume.py | Create checkpoints, inspect them, and resume execution |
| Checkpoint & HITL Resume | checkpoint/checkpoint_with_human_in_the_loop.py | Combine checkpointing with human approvals and resume pending HITL requests |
| Checkpointed Sub-Workflow | checkpoint/sub_workflow_checkpoint.py | Save and resume a sub-workflow that pauses for human approval |
| Handoff + Tool Approval Resume | orchestrations/handoff_with_tool_approval_checkpoint_resume.py | Handoff workflow that captures tool-call approvals in checkpoints and resumes with human decisions |
| Workflow as Agent Checkpoint | checkpoint/workflow_as_agent_checkpoint.py | Enable checkpointing when using workflow.as_agent() with checkpoint_storage parameter |
composition
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-Workflow (Basics) | composition/sub_workflow_basics.py | Wrap a workflow as an executor and orchestrate sub-workflows |
| Sub-Workflow: Request Interception | composition/sub_workflow_request_interception.py | Intercept and forward sub-workflow requests using @handler for SubWorkflowRequestMessage |
| Sub-Workflow: Parallel Requests | composition/sub_workflow_parallel_requests.py | Multiple specialized interceptors handling different request types from same sub-workflow |
| Sub-Workflow: kwargs Propagation | composition/sub_workflow_kwargs.py | Pass custom context (user tokens, config) from parent workflow through to sub-workflow agents |
control-flow
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential Executors | control-flow/sequential_executors.py | Sequential workflow with explicit executor setup |
| Sequential (Streaming) | control-flow/sequential_streaming.py | Stream events from a simple sequential run |
| Edge Condition | control-flow/edge_condition.py | Conditional routing based on agent classification |
| Switch-Case Edge Group | control-flow/switch_case_edge_group.py | Switch-case branching using classifier outputs |
| Multi-Selection Edge Group | control-flow/multi_selection_edge_group.py | Select one or many targets dynamically (subset fan-out) |
| Simple Loop | control-flow/simple_loop.py | Feedback loop where an agent judges ABOVE/BELOW/MATCHED |
| Workflow Cancellation | control-flow/workflow_cancellation.py | Cancel a running workflow using asyncio tasks |
human-in-the-loop
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Human-In-The-Loop (Guessing Game) | human-in-the-loop/guessing_game_with_human_input.py | Interactive request/response prompts with a human via ctx.request_info() |
| Agents with Approval Requests in Workflows | human-in-the-loop/agents_with_approval_requests.py | Agents that create approval requests during workflow execution and wait for human approval to proceed |
| Agents with Declaration-Only Tools | human-in-the-loop/agents_with_declaration_only_tools.py | Workflow pauses when agent calls a client-side tool (func=None), caller supplies the result |
Builder-oriented request-info samples are maintained in the orchestration sample set (sequential, concurrent, and group-chat builder variants).
tool-approval
Builder-based tool approval samples are maintained in the orchestration sample set.
observability
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Executor I/O Observation | observability/executor_io_observation.py | Observe executor input/output data via executor_invoked events (type='executor_invoked') and executor_completed events (type='executor_completed') without modifying executor code |
For additional observability samples in Agent Framework, see the observability concept samples. The workflow observability sample demonstrates integrating observability into workflows.
orchestration
Orchestration-focused samples (Sequential, Concurrent, Handoff, GroupChat, Magentic), including builder-based
workflow.as_agent(...) variants, are documented in the orchestrations directory.
parallelism
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrent (Fan-out/Fan-in) | parallelism/fan_out_fan_in_edges.py | Dispatch to multiple executors and aggregate results |
| Aggregate Results of Different Types | parallelism/aggregate_results_of_different_types.py | Handle results of different types from multiple concurrent executors |
| Map-Reduce with Visualization | parallelism/map_reduce_and_visualization.py | Fan-out/fan-in pattern with diagram export |
state-management
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| State with Agents | state-management/state_with_agents.py | Store in state once and later reuse across agents |
| Workflow Kwargs (Custom Context) | state-management/workflow_kwargs.py | Pass custom context (data, user tokens) via kwargs to @tool tools |
visualization
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrent with Visualization | visualization/concurrent_with_visualization.py | Fan-out/fan-in workflow with diagram export |
declarative
YAML-based declarative workflows allow you to define multi-agent orchestration patterns without writing Python code. See the declarative workflows README for more details on YAML workflow syntax and available actions.
| Sample | File | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| Agent to Function Tool | declarative/agent_to_function_tool/ | Chain agent output to InvokeFunctionTool actions |
| Conditional Workflow | declarative/conditional_workflow/ | Nested conditional branching based on user input |
| Customer Support | declarative/customer_support/ | Multi-agent customer support with routing |
| Deep Research | declarative/deep_research/ | Research workflow with planning, searching, and synthesis |
| Function Tools | declarative/function_tools/ | Invoking Python functions from declarative workflows |
| Human-in-Loop | declarative/human_in_loop/ | Interactive workflows that request user input |
| Invoke Function Tool | declarative/invoke_function_tool/ | Call registered Python functions with InvokeFunctionTool |
| Marketing | declarative/marketing/ | Marketing content generation workflow |
| Simple Workflow | declarative/simple_workflow/ | Basic workflow with variable setting, conditionals, and loops |
| Student Teacher | declarative/student_teacher/ | Student-teacher interaction pattern |
resources
- Sample text inputs used by certain workflows:
Notes
- Agent-based samples use provider SDKs (Azure/OpenAI, etc.). Ensure credentials are configured, or adapt agents accordingly.
Sequential orchestration uses a few small adapter nodes for plumbing:
- "input-conversation" normalizes input to
list[Message] - "to-conversation:" converts agent responses into the shared conversation
- "complete" publishes the final output event (type='output') These may appear in event streams (executor_invoked/executor_completed). They're analogous to concurrent’s dispatcher and aggregator and can be ignored if you only care about agent activity.
AzureOpenAIResponsesClient vs AzureAIAgent
Workflow and orchestration samples use AzureOpenAIResponsesClient rather than the CRUD-style AzureAIAgent client. The key difference:
-
AzureOpenAIResponsesClient— A lightweight client that uses the underlying Agent Service V2 (Responses API) for non-CRUD-style agents. Orchestrations use this client because agents are created locally and do not require server-side lifecycle management (create/update/delete). This is the recommended client for orchestration patterns (Sequential, Concurrent, Handoff, GroupChat, Magentic). -
AzureAIAgent— A CRUD-style client for server-managed agents. Use this when you need persistent, server-side agent definitions with features like file search, code interpreter sessions, or thread management provided by the Azure AI Agent Service.
Environment Variables
Workflow samples that use AzureOpenAIResponsesClient expect:
AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT(Azure AI Foundry Agent Service (V2) project endpoint)AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME(model deployment name)
These values are passed directly into the client constructor via os.getenv() in sample code.