mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/agent-framework.git
synced 2026-06-16 21:04:09 +08:00
Eduard van Valkenburg
ddfbdf5c7a
* Python: Information-flow control based prompt injection defense (#5024) * fides integration * documentation * documentation * documentation * human-approval on policy violation * numenous hyena 'works' * IFC based implementation * minor edits in documentation * rebasing the branch and running the email example * Add security tests for IFC middleware * Fix Role.TOOL NameError in approval handling * tiered labelling scheme * 3 tier labelling scheme in middleware * Adapt security middleware to list[Content] tool results * Refactor SecureAgentConfig as context provider and address Copilot review comments * Update FIDES docs to reflect context provider pattern and update code for ContextProvider rename * Fix security examples: use OpenAIChatClient instead of non-existent AzureOpenAIChatClient * Address PR review: consolidate security modules, remove ContentLineage, update docs * remove unrelated files * remove comment from _tools.py and rename decision file * Fix CI failures: Bandit B110, broken md links, hosted approval passthrough * apply template to decision doc 0024 * minor fixes to decision doc 0024 --------- Co-authored-by: Aashish <t-akolluri@microsoft.com> * Python: follow up FIDES security flow (#5330) * Python: follow up FIDES security flow Refine the secure approval path, mark the security classes with the FIDES experimental feature label, and clean up the related docs/tests. Also fix workspace-level validation regressions uncovered while running the full Python check suite. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Python: remove FIDES GitHub MCP sample Drop the GitHub MCP security sample from the FIDES follow-up branch while keeping the remaining security docs and samples intact. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Address PR review: fix paths and update FIDES implementation (#5352) * Python: updated import naming and comment from review (#5421) * updated import naming and comment from review * Add approval replay None call-id test Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Python: Address PR 5331 comments and track sesssion while calling Agent in email_security_example (#5446) * Address PR review: fix paths and update FIDES implementation * Address PR comments and add session tracking in email example in samples * Fix session creation and resolve merge conflict in docstring example * Resolve merge conflict in docstring example * Python: add test for empty-message pruning in approval result replacement (#5617) Adds test coverage for the second-pass logic in `_replace_approval_contents_with_results` that removes messages whose `contents` list becomes empty after first-pass content removal. Addresses review comment on PR #5331: https://github.com/microsoft/agent-framework/pull/5331#discussion_r3129039445 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: shrutitople <shruti.tople@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aashish <t-akolluri@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
ddfbdf5c7a
ยท
2026-05-05 18:08:08 +00:00
History
Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)
An Architectural Decision (AD) is a justified software design choice that addresses a functional or non-functional requirement that is architecturally significant. An Architectural Decision Record (ADR) captures a single AD and its rationale.
For more information see
How are we using ADRs to track technical decisions?
- Copy docs/decisions/adr-template.md to docs/decisions/NNNN-title-with-dashes.md, where NNNN indicates the next number in sequence.
- Check for existing PR's to make sure you use the correct sequence number.
- There is also a short form template docs/decisions/adr-short-template.md
- Edit NNNN-title-with-dashes.md.
- Status must initially be
proposed - List of
decidersmust include the github ids of the people who will sign off on the decision. - The relevant EM and architect must be listed as deciders or informed of all decisions.
- You should list the names or github ids of all partners who were consulted as part of the decision.
- Keep the list of
decidersshort. You can also list people who wereconsultedorinformedabout the decision.
- Status must initially be
- For each option list the good, neutral and bad aspects of each considered alternative.
- Detailed investigations can be included in the
More Informationsection inline or as links to external documents.
- Detailed investigations can be included in the
- Share your PR with the deciders and other interested parties.
- Deciders must be listed as required reviewers.
- The status must be updated to
acceptedonce a decision is agreed and the date must also be updated. - Approval of the decision is captured using PR approval.
- Decisions can be changed later and superseded by a new ADR. In this case it is useful to record any negative outcomes in the original ADR.