Files
Eduard van Valkenburg 5e056b672e Python: [BREAKING] Python: Provider-leading client design & OpenAI package extraction (#4818)
* Python: Provider-leading client design & OpenAI package extraction

Major refactoring of the Python Agent Framework client architecture:

- Extract OpenAI clients into new `agent-framework-openai` package
- Core package no longer depends on openai, azure-identity, azure-ai-projects
- Rename clients for discoverability: OpenAIResponsesClient → OpenAIChatClient,
  OpenAIChatClient → OpenAIChatCompletionClient
- Unify `model_id`/`deployment_name`/`model_deployment_name` → `model` param
- New FoundryChatClient for Azure AI Foundry Responses API
- New FoundryAgent/FoundryAgentClient for connecting to pre-configured Foundry agents
- Remove OpenAIBase/OpenAIConfigMixin from non-deprecated client MRO
- Deprecate AzureOpenAI* clients, AzureAIClient, OpenAIAssistantsClient
- Reorganize samples: azure_openai+azure_ai+azure_ai_agent → azure/
- ADR-0020: Provider-Leading Client Design

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: missing Agent imports in samples, .model_id → .model in foundry_local sample

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: CI failures — mypy errors, coverage targets, sample imports

- azure-ai mypy: add type ignores for TypedDict total=, model arg, forward ref
- Coverage: replace core.azure/openai targets with openai package target
- project_provider: add type annotation for opts dict

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: populate openai .pyi stub, fix broken README links, coverage targets

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fixes

* updated observabilitty

* reset azure init.pyi

* fix errors

* updated adr number

* fix foundry local

* fixed not renamed docstrings and comments, and added deprecated markers to old classes

* fix tests and pyprojects

* fix test vars

* updated function tests

* update durable

* updated test setup for functions

* Fix Foundry auth in workflow samples

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Stabilize Python integration workflows

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update hosting samples for Foundry

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Trigger full CI rerun

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Trigger CI rerun again

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* trigger rerun

* trigger rerun

* fix for litellm

* undo durabletask changes

* Move Foundry APIs into foundry namespace

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix Foundry pyproject formatting

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Split provider samples by Foundry surface

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Restore hosting sample requirements

Also fix the Foundry Local sample link after the provider sample move.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* updated tests

* udpated foundry integration tests

* removed dist from azurefunctions tests

* Use separate Foundry clients for concurrent agents

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix client setup in azfunc and durable

* disabled two tests

* updated setup for some function and durable tests

* improved azure openai setup with new clients

* ignore deprecated

* fixes

* skip 11

* remove openai assistants int tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
5e056b672e · 2026-03-25 09:56:29 +00:00
History
..

Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)

An Architectural Decision (AD) is a justified software design choice that addresses a functional or non-functional requirement that is architecturally significant. An Architectural Decision Record (ADR) captures a single AD and its rationale.

For more information see

How are we using ADRs to track technical decisions?

  1. Copy docs/decisions/adr-template.md to docs/decisions/NNNN-title-with-dashes.md, where NNNN indicates the next number in sequence.
    1. Check for existing PR's to make sure you use the correct sequence number.
    2. There is also a short form template docs/decisions/adr-short-template.md
  2. Edit NNNN-title-with-dashes.md.
    1. Status must initially be proposed
    2. List of deciders must include the github ids of the people who will sign off on the decision.
    3. The relevant EM and architect must be listed as deciders or informed of all decisions.
    4. You should list the names or github ids of all partners who were consulted as part of the decision.
    5. Keep the list of deciders short. You can also list people who were consulted or informed about the decision.
  3. For each option list the good, neutral and bad aspects of each considered alternative.
    1. Detailed investigations can be included in the More Information section inline or as links to external documents.
  4. Share your PR with the deciders and other interested parties.
    1. Deciders must be listed as required reviewers.
    2. The status must be updated to accepted once a decision is agreed and the date must also be updated.
    3. Approval of the decision is captured using PR approval.
  5. Decisions can be changed later and superseded by a new ADR. In this case it is useful to record any negative outcomes in the original ADR.