mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/agent-framework.git
synced 2026-06-16 21:04:09 +08:00
.NET: [BREAKING] Rename from ServiceStoredSimulatingChatClient to PerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistingChatClient (#4993)
* Rename from ServiceStoredSimulatingChatClient to PerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistingChatClient * Address PR comment
This commit is contained in:
committed by
GitHub
Unverified
parent
9c57680f00
commit
6e7254bba7
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The persistence timing and `FunctionResultContent` trimming behaviors are interr
|
||||
## Considered Options
|
||||
|
||||
- Option 1: Per-run persistence with opt-in FRC (FunctionResultContent) trimming
|
||||
- Option 2: Opt-in per-service-call persistence (via `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory`)
|
||||
- Option 2: Opt-in per-service-call persistence (via `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Pros and Cons of the Options
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ Keep the current default behavior of persisting chat history only at the end of
|
||||
- Bad, because if the process crashes mid-loop, all intermediate progress from the current run is lost, not satisfying driver C.
|
||||
- Bad, because this option alone does not provide a way for users to opt into per-service-call persistence, not satisfying driver E.
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 2: Opt-in per-service-call persistence (via `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory`)
|
||||
### Option 2: Opt-in per-service-call persistence (via `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence`)
|
||||
|
||||
Introduce an optional SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory setting to persist chat history after each individual service call within the FIC loop, matching the AI service's behavior. Trailing `FunctionResultContent` trimming is unnecessary with this approach (it is naturally handled).
|
||||
Introduce an optional RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence setting to persist chat history after each individual service call within the FIC loop, matching the AI service's behavior. Trailing `FunctionResultContent` trimming is unnecessary with this approach (it is naturally handled).
|
||||
|
||||
Settings:
|
||||
- `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory` = `true`
|
||||
- `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence` = `true`
|
||||
|
||||
- Good, because the stored history matches the service's behavior when opting in for both timing and content, fully satisfying driver A.
|
||||
- Good, because intermediate progress is preserved if the process is interrupted, satisfying driver C.
|
||||
@@ -73,36 +73,49 @@ Settings:
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Chosen option: **Option 2: Opt-in per-service-call persistence (via `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory`)**. The existing per-run persistence behavior is retained as-is, requiring no changes from users. Per-service-call persistence is available as an opt-in feature via the `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory` setting. This satisfies drivers B (atomicity) and D (simplicity) for the common case, while fully satisfying driver A (consistency) for users who opt into simulated service-stored behavior. Users who need per-service-call persistence for recoverability (driver C) can enable it explicitly.
|
||||
Chosen option: **Option 2: Opt-in per-service-call persistence (via `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence`)**. The existing per-run persistence behavior is retained as-is, requiring no changes from users. Per-service-call persistence is available as an opt-in feature via the `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence` setting. This satisfies drivers B (atomicity) and D (simplicity) for the common case, while fully satisfying driver A (consistency) for users who opt into simulated service-stored behavior. Users who need per-service-call persistence for recoverability (driver C) can enable it explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Configuration Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
The behavior depends on the combination of `UseProvidedChatClientAsIs` and `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory`:
|
||||
The behavior depends on the combination of `UseProvidedChatClientAsIs` and `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence`:
|
||||
|
||||
| `UseProvidedChatClientAsIs` | `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory` | Behavior |
|
||||
| `UseProvidedChatClientAsIs` | `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence` | Behavior |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| `false` (default) | `false` (default) | **Per-run persistence.** Messages are persisted at the end of the full agent run via the `ChatHistoryProvider`. |
|
||||
| `false` | `true` | **Per-service-call persistence (simulated).** A `ServiceStoredSimulatingChatClient` middleware is automatically injected into the chat client pipeline between `FunctionInvokingChatClient` and the leaf `IChatClient`. Messages are persisted after each service call. A sentinel `ConversationId` causes FIC to treat the conversation as service-managed. |
|
||||
| `false` | `true` | **Per-service-call persistence (simulated).** A `PerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistingChatClient` middleware is automatically injected into the chat client pipeline between `FunctionInvokingChatClient` and the leaf `IChatClient`. Messages are persisted after each service call. A sentinel `ConversationId` causes FIC to treat the conversation as service-managed. |
|
||||
| `true` | `false` | **Per-run persistence.** No middleware is injected because the user has provided a custom chat client stack. Messages are persisted at the end of the run. |
|
||||
| `true` | `true` | **User responsibility.** The system checks whether the custom chat client stack includes a `ServiceStoredSimulatingChatClient`. If not, a warning is emitted — the user is expected to have added their own per-service-call persistence mechanism. End-of-run persistence is skipped. |
|
||||
| `true` | `true` | **User responsibility.** The system checks whether the custom chat client stack includes a `PerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistingChatClient`. If not, a warning is emitted — the user is expected to have added their own per-service-call persistence mechanism. End-of-run persistence is skipped. |
|
||||
|
||||
### Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Good, because per-run persistence is atomic by default — chat history is only updated when the full run succeeds, satisfying driver B.
|
||||
- Good, because the default mental model is simple: one run = one history update, satisfying driver D.
|
||||
- Good, because users who opt into `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory` get stored history that matches the service's behavior for both timing and content, fully satisfying driver A.
|
||||
- Good, because users who opt into `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence` get stored history that matches the service's behavior for both timing and content, fully satisfying driver A.
|
||||
- Good, because per-service-call persistence preserves intermediate progress if the process is interrupted, satisfying driver C when opted in.
|
||||
- Good, because no separate `FunctionResultContent` trimming logic is needed when per-service-call persistence is active — it is naturally handled.
|
||||
- Good, because conflict detection (configurable via `ThrowOnChatHistoryProviderConflict`, `WarnOnChatHistoryProviderConflict`, `ClearOnChatHistoryProviderConflict`) prevents misconfiguration when a service returns a `ConversationId` alongside a configured `ChatHistoryProvider`.
|
||||
- Bad, because per-service-call persistence (when opted in) may leave chat history in an incomplete state if the run fails mid-loop (e.g., `FunctionCallContent` stored without corresponding `FunctionResultContent`), requiring manual recovery in rare cases.
|
||||
- Neutral, because users who want per-service-call consistency can opt in via `SimulateServiceStoredChatHistory = true`, satisfying driver E.
|
||||
- Neutral, because users who want per-service-call consistency can opt in via `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence = true`, satisfying driver E.
|
||||
- Neutral, because increased write frequency from per-service-call persistence may impact performance for some storage backends; this can be mitigated with a caching decorator.
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Notes
|
||||
|
||||
#### Conversation ID Consistency
|
||||
|
||||
We should introduce a separate `ConversationIdPersistingChatClient`, middleware which allows us to
|
||||
persist response `ConversationIds` during the FICC loop. This could be used with or without
|
||||
`ServiceStoredSimulatingChatClient`.
|
||||
When `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence` is enabled, the `PerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistingChatClient`
|
||||
decorator also updates `session.ConversationId` after each service call. This handles two scenarios:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Framework-managed chat history** — the decorator sets a sentinel `ConversationId` on the response
|
||||
so that `FunctionInvokingChatClient` treats the conversation as service-managed (clearing accumulated
|
||||
history between iterations and not injecting duplicate `FunctionCallContent` during approval processing).
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Service-stored chat history** — when the service returns a real `ConversationId`, the decorator
|
||||
updates `session.ConversationId` immediately after each service call, rather than deferring the update
|
||||
to the end of the run. This ensures intermediate ConversationId changes are captured even if the
|
||||
process is interrupted mid-loop.
|
||||
|
||||
For some service-stored scenarios (e.g., the Conversations API with the Responses API), there is only
|
||||
one thread with one ID, so every service call returns the same ConversationId and this per-call update
|
||||
makes no practical difference. Enabling `RequirePerServiceCallChatHistoryPersistence` ensures consistent
|
||||
per-service-call behavior across all service types regardless of how they manage ConversationIds.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user