Foundry Evals integration for Python

Merged and refactored eval module per Eduard's PR review:

- Merge _eval.py + _local_eval.py into single _evaluation.py
- Convert EvalItem from dataclass to regular class
- Rename to_dict() to to_eval_data()
- Convert _AgentEvalData to TypedDict
- Simplify check system: unified async pattern with isawaitable
- Parallelize checks and evaluators with asyncio.gather
- Add all/any mode to tool_called_check
- Fix bool(passed) truthy bug in _coerce_result
- Remove deprecated function_evaluator/async_function_evaluator aliases
- Remove _MinimalAgent, tighten evaluate_agent signature
- Set self.name in __init__ (LocalEvaluator, FoundryEvals)
- Limit FoundryEvals to AsyncOpenAI only
- Type project_client as AIProjectClient
- Remove NotImplementedError continuous eval code
- Add evaluation samples in 02-agents/ and 03-workflows/
- Update all imports and tests (167 passing)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
alliscode
2026-03-17 14:10:03 -07:00
Unverified
parent 100086a276
commit 45527eed29
22 changed files with 7189 additions and 9 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
"""Evaluate an agent with local checks — no API keys needed.
Demonstrates the simplest evaluation workflow:
1. Define checks using the @evaluator decorator
2. Run evaluate_agent() which calls agent.run() under the covers
3. Assert results in CI or inspect interactively
Usage:
uv run python samples/02-agents/evaluation/evaluate_agent.py
"""
import asyncio
from agent_framework import (
Agent,
LocalEvaluator,
evaluate_agent,
evaluator,
keyword_check,
)
# A custom check — parameter names determine what data you receive
@evaluator
def is_helpful(response: str) -> bool:
"""Check the response isn't empty or a refusal."""
refusals = ["i can't", "i'm not able", "i don't know"]
return len(response) > 10 and not any(r in response.lower() for r in refusals)
async def main():
agent = Agent(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
instructions="You are a helpful weather assistant.",
)
# Combine built-in and custom checks
local = LocalEvaluator(
keyword_check("weather"), # response must mention "weather"
is_helpful, # custom check
)
# evaluate_agent() calls agent.run() for each query, then evaluates
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=[
"What's the weather like in Seattle?",
"Will it rain in London tomorrow?",
"What should I wear for 30°C weather?",
],
evaluators=local,
)
for r in results:
print(f"{r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for item in r.items:
print(f" [{item.status}] Q: {item.input_text[:50]} A: {item.output_text[:50]}...")
for score in item.scores:
print(f" {score.name}: {'' if score.passed else ''}")
# Use in CI: will raise AssertionError if any check fails
# results[0].assert_passed()
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
"""Evaluate an agent with expected outputs and tool call checks.
Demonstrates ground-truth comparison and tool usage evaluation:
1. Provide expected outputs alongside queries
2. Use built-in tool_calls_present for tool verification
3. Combine multiple evaluation criteria
Usage:
uv run python samples/02-agents/evaluation/evaluate_with_expected.py
"""
import asyncio
from agent_framework import (
Agent,
LocalEvaluator,
evaluate_agent,
evaluator,
tool_calls_present,
)
@evaluator
def response_matches_expected(response: str, expected_output: str) -> float:
"""Score based on word overlap with expected output."""
if not expected_output:
return 1.0
response_words = set(response.lower().split())
expected_words = set(expected_output.lower().split())
return len(response_words & expected_words) / max(len(expected_words), 1)
async def main():
agent = Agent(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
instructions="You are a math tutor. Answer concisely.",
)
local = LocalEvaluator(
response_matches_expected,
tool_calls_present, # verifies expected tools were called
)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What is 2 + 2?", "What is the square root of 144?"],
expected_output=["4", "12"],
expected_tool_calls=[
[], # no tools expected for simple math
[],
],
evaluators=local,
)
for r in results:
print(f"{r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for item in r.items:
print(f" [{item.status}] {item.input_text}{item.output_text[:80]}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
"""Evaluate a multi-agent workflow with per-agent breakdown.
Demonstrates workflow evaluation:
1. Build a simple two-agent workflow
2. Run evaluate_workflow() which runs the workflow and evaluates each agent
3. Inspect per-agent results in sub_results
Usage:
uv run python samples/03-workflows/evaluation/evaluate_workflow.py
"""
import asyncio
from agent_framework import (
Agent,
AgentExecutor,
LocalEvaluator,
WorkflowBuilder,
evaluate_workflow,
evaluator,
keyword_check,
)
@evaluator
def is_nonempty(response: str) -> bool:
"""Check the agent produced a non-trivial response."""
return len(response.strip()) > 5
async def main():
# Build a simple planner → executor workflow
planner = Agent(model="gpt-4o-mini", instructions="You plan trips. Output a bullet-point plan.")
executor_agent = Agent(model="gpt-4o-mini", instructions="You execute travel plans. Book the items listed.")
builder = WorkflowBuilder()
builder.add_executor(AgentExecutor("planner", planner))
builder.add_executor(AgentExecutor("booker", executor_agent))
builder.add_edge("planner", "booker")
workflow = builder.build()
# Evaluate with per-agent breakdown
local = LocalEvaluator(is_nonempty, keyword_check("plan", "trip"))
results = await evaluate_workflow(
workflow=workflow,
queries=["Plan a weekend trip to Paris"],
evaluators=local,
)
for r in results:
print(f"{r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed (overall)")
for agent_name, sub in r.sub_results.items():
print(f" {agent_name}: {sub.passed}/{sub.total}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT="<your-project-endpoint>"
AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME="<your-model-deployment>"
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
# Foundry Evals Integration Samples
These samples demonstrate evaluating agent-framework agents using Azure AI Foundry's built-in evaluators.
## Available Evaluators
| Category | Evaluators |
|----------|-----------|
| **Agent behavior** | `intent_resolution`, `task_adherence`, `task_completion`, `task_navigation_efficiency` |
| **Tool usage** | `tool_call_accuracy`, `tool_selection`, `tool_input_accuracy`, `tool_output_utilization`, `tool_call_success` |
| **Quality** | `coherence`, `fluency`, `relevance`, `groundedness`, `response_completeness`, `similarity` |
| **Safety** | `violence`, `sexual`, `self_harm`, `hate_unfairness` |
## Samples
### `evaluate_agent_sample.py` — Dataset Evaluation (Path 3)
The dev inner loop. Two patterns from simplest to most control:
1. **`evaluate_agent()`** — One call: runs agent → converts → evaluates
2. **`evaluate_dataset()`** — Run agent yourself, convert with `AgentEvalConverter`, inspect/modify, then evaluate
```bash
uv run samples/05-end-to-end/evaluation/foundry_evals/evaluate_agent_sample.py
```
### `evaluate_traces_sample.py` — Trace & Response Evaluation (Path 1)
Evaluate what already happened — zero changes to agent code:
1. **`evaluate_responses()`** — Evaluate Responses API responses by ID
2. **`evaluate_traces()`** — Evaluate from OTel traces in App Insights
```bash
uv run samples/05-end-to-end/evaluation/foundry_evals/evaluate_traces_sample.py
```
## Setup
Create a `.env` file with configuration as in the `.env.example` file in this folder.
## Which sample should I start with?
- **"I want to test my agent during development"** → `evaluate_agent_sample.py`, Pattern 1
- **"I want to evaluate past agent runs"** → `evaluate_traces_sample.py`
- **"I want to inspect/modify eval data before submitting"** → `evaluate_agent_sample.py`, Pattern 2
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
import asyncio
import os
from agent_framework import Agent, AgentEvalConverter, ConversationSplit, evaluate_agent
from agent_framework.azure import AzureOpenAIResponsesClient
from agent_framework_azure_ai import FoundryEvals
from azure.ai.projects.aio import AIProjectClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
"""
This sample demonstrates evaluating an agent using Azure AI Foundry's built-in evaluators.
It shows three patterns:
1. evaluate_agent(responses=...) — Evaluate a response you already have.
2. evaluate_agent(queries=...) — Run the agent against test queries and evaluate in one call.
3. FoundryEvals.evaluate() — Full control with direct evaluator access.
Prerequisites:
- An Azure AI Foundry project with a deployed model
- Set AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT and AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME in .env
Required components:
- An Agent with tools (the agent to evaluate)
- A FoundryEvals instance (the evaluator)
"""
# Define a simple tool for the agent
def get_weather(location: str) -> str:
"""Get the current weather for a location."""
weather_data = {
"seattle": "62°F, cloudy with a chance of rain",
"london": "55°F, overcast",
"paris": "68°F, partly sunny",
}
return weather_data.get(location.lower(), f"Weather data not available for {location}")
def get_flight_price(origin: str, destination: str) -> str:
"""Get the price of a flight between two cities."""
return f"Flights from {origin} to {destination}: $450 round-trip"
async def main():
# 1. Set up the Azure AI project client
project_client = AIProjectClient(
endpoint=os.environ["AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential(),
)
deployment = os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME", "gpt-4o")
# 2. Create an agent with tools
agent = Agent(
client=AzureOpenAIResponsesClient(
project_client=project_client,
deployment_name=deployment,
),
name="travel-assistant",
instructions=(
"You are a helpful travel assistant. Use your tools to answer questions about weather and flights."
),
tools=[get_weather, get_flight_price],
)
# 3. Create the evaluator — provider config goes here, once
evals = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 1: evaluate_agent(responses=...) — evaluate a response you already have
# =========================================================================
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 1: evaluate_agent(responses=...) — evaluate existing response")
print("=" * 60)
query = "How much does a flight from Seattle to Paris cost?"
response = await agent.run(query)
print(f"Agent said: {response.text[:100]}...")
# Pass agent= so tool definitions are extracted, queries= for the eval item context
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
responses=response,
queries=[query],
evaluators=evals.select(FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.TOOL_CALL_ACCURACY),
)
for r in results:
print(f"Status: {r.status}")
print(f"Results: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
print(f"Portal: {r.report_url}")
if r.all_passed:
print("✓ All passed")
else:
print(f"{r.failed} failed, {r.errored} errored")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 2a: evaluate_agent() — batch test queries
# =========================================================================
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 2a: evaluate_agent()")
print("=" * 60)
# Calls agent.run() under the covers for each query, then evaluates
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=[
"What's the weather like in Seattle?",
"How much does a flight from Seattle to Paris cost?",
"What should I pack for London?",
],
evaluators=evals, # uses smart defaults (auto-adds tool_call_accuracy)
)
for r in results:
print(f"Status: {r.status}")
print(f"Results: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
print(f"Portal: {r.report_url}")
if r.all_passed:
print("✓ All passed")
else:
print(f"{r.failed} failed, {r.errored} errored")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 2b: evaluate_agent() — with conversation split override
# =========================================================================
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 2b: evaluate_agent() with conversation_split")
print("=" * 60)
# conversation_split forces all evaluators to use the same split strategy.
# FULL evaluates the entire conversation trajectory against the original query.
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=[
"What's the weather like in Seattle?",
"What should I pack for London?",
],
evaluators=evals,
conversation_split=ConversationSplit.FULL, # overrides evaluator defaults
)
for r in results:
print(f"Status: {r.status}")
print(f"Results: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
print(f"Portal: {r.report_url}")
if r.all_passed:
print("✓ All passed")
else:
print(f"{r.failed} failed, {r.errored} errored")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 3: FoundryEvals.evaluate() — manual control
# =========================================================================
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 3: FoundryEvals.evaluate() — manual control")
print("=" * 60)
queries = [
"What's the weather in Paris?",
"Find me a flight from London to Seattle",
]
items = []
for q in queries:
response = await agent.run(q)
print(f"Query: {q}")
print(f"Response: {response.text[:100]}...")
item = AgentEvalConverter.to_eval_item(query=q, response=response, agent=agent)
items.append(item)
print(f" Has tools: {item.tools is not None}")
if item.tools:
print(f" Tools: {[t.name for t in item.tools]}")
# Submit directly to the evaluator
tool_evals = evals.select(FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.TOOL_CALL_ACCURACY)
results = await tool_evals.evaluate(items, eval_name="Travel Assistant Eval")
print(f"\nStatus: {results.status}")
print(f"Results: {results.passed}/{results.total} passed")
print(f"Portal: {results.report_url}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,544 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
"""
Agent Evaluation — Complete Guide
==================================
This sample shows every way to evaluate agents and workflows in
Microsoft Agent Framework. Run the sections that match your needs.
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluation Options │
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. Your own function (no setup) │
│ 2. Built-in checks (no setup) │
│ 3. Azure AI Foundry (cloud) │
│ 4. Mix them all (recommended) │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
Each evaluator plugs into the same two entry points:
evaluate_agent() — run agent + evaluate, or evaluate existing responses
evaluate_workflow() — evaluate multi-agent workflows with per-agent breakdown
"""
import asyncio
import os
from agent_framework import (
Agent,
LocalEvaluator,
Message,
evaluate_agent,
evaluate_workflow,
evaluator,
keyword_check,
tool_called_check,
)
from agent_framework.azure import AzureOpenAIResponsesClient
from agent_framework_azure_ai import FoundryEvals
from agent_framework_orchestrations import GroupChatBuilder, SequentialBuilder
from azure.ai.projects.aio import AIProjectClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
# ── Tools for our agents ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def get_weather(location: str) -> str:
"""Get the current weather for a location."""
return {"seattle": "62°F, cloudy", "london": "55°F, overcast", "paris": "68°F, sunny"}.get(
location.lower(), f"No data for {location}"
)
def get_flight_price(origin: str, destination: str) -> str:
"""Get the price of a flight between two cities."""
return f"Flights from {origin} to {destination}: $450 round-trip"
# ── Output helpers ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def print_workflow_results(results):
"""Print workflow eval results with clear provider → overall → per-agent hierarchy."""
for r in results:
status = "" if r.all_passed else ""
print(f"\n {r.provider}:")
print(f" {status} overall: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
if r.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {r.report_url}")
for agent_name, sub in r.sub_results.items():
agent_status = "" if sub.all_passed else ""
print(f" {agent_status} {agent_name}: {sub.passed}/{sub.total}")
if sub.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {sub.report_url}")
# ── Agent setup ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def create_agent(project_client, deployment):
"""Create a travel assistant agent."""
return Agent(
client=AzureOpenAIResponsesClient(
project_client=project_client,
deployment_name=deployment,
),
name="travel-assistant",
instructions="You are a helpful travel assistant. Use your tools to answer questions.",
tools=[get_weather, get_flight_price],
)
def create_workflow(project_client, deployment):
"""Create a researcher → planner sequential workflow."""
client = AzureOpenAIResponsesClient(
project_client=project_client,
deployment_name=deployment,
)
researcher = Agent(
client=client,
name="researcher",
instructions="You are a travel researcher. Use tools to gather weather and flight info.",
tools=[get_weather, get_flight_price],
default_options={"store": False},
)
planner = Agent(
client=client,
name="planner",
instructions="You are a travel planner. Create a concise recommendation from the research.",
default_options={"store": False},
)
return SequentialBuilder(participants=[researcher, planner]).build()
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Section 1: Custom Function Evaluators
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
#
# Write a plain Python function. Name your parameters to get the data you need.
# Return bool, float (≥0.5 = pass), or dict.
#
# Available parameters:
# query, response, expected_output, conversation, tool_definitions, context
#
# ── Simple check: just query + response ──────────────────────────────────────
@evaluator
def is_helpful(response: str) -> bool:
"""Response should be more than a one-liner."""
return len(response.split()) > 10
@evaluator
def no_apologies(query: str, response: str) -> bool:
"""Agent shouldn't start with 'I'm sorry' or 'I apologize'."""
lower = response.lower().strip()
return not lower.startswith("i'm sorry") and not lower.startswith("i apologize")
# ── Scored check: return a float ─────────────────────────────────────────────
@evaluator
def relevance_keyword_overlap(query: str, response: str) -> float:
"""Score based on how many query words appear in the response."""
query_words = set(query.lower().split()) - {"the", "a", "in", "to", "is", "what", "how"}
response_lower = response.lower()
if not query_words:
return 1.0
return sum(1 for w in query_words if w in response_lower) / len(query_words)
# ── Ground truth check: compare against expected output ──────────────────────
@evaluator
def mentions_expected_city(response: str, expected_output: str) -> bool:
"""Response should mention the expected city."""
return expected_output.lower() in response.lower()
# ── Full context check: inspect conversation and tools ───────────────────────
@evaluator
def used_available_tools(conversation: list, tool_definitions: list) -> dict:
"""Check that the agent actually called at least one of its tools."""
available = {t.get("name", "") for t in (tool_definitions or [])}
called = set()
for msg in conversation:
for tc in msg.get("tool_calls", []):
name = tc.get("function", {}).get("name", "")
if name:
called.add(name)
for ci in msg.get("content", []):
if isinstance(ci, dict) and ci.get("type") == "tool_call":
called.add(ci.get("name", ""))
used = called & available
return {
"passed": len(used) > 0,
"reason": f"Used {sorted(used)}" if used else f"No tools called (available: {sorted(available)})",
}
async def demo_evaluators(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate an agent with custom function evaluators."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 1. Custom Function Evaluators")
print("" * 60)
agent = create_agent(project_client, deployment)
local = LocalEvaluator(
is_helpful,
no_apologies,
relevance_keyword_overlap,
used_available_tools,
)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?", "How much is a flight to Paris?"],
evaluators=local,
)
for r in results:
print(f"\n {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for check, counts in r.per_evaluator.items():
status = "" if counts["failed"] == 0 else ""
print(f" {status} {check}: {counts['passed']}/{counts['passed'] + counts['failed']}")
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Section 2: Built-in Local Checks
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
#
# Pre-built checks for common patterns — no function needed.
#
async def demo_builtin_checks(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate with built-in keyword and tool checks."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 2. Built-in Local Checks")
print("" * 60)
agent = create_agent(project_client, deployment)
local = LocalEvaluator(
keyword_check("weather", "seattle"), # response must contain these words
tool_called_check("get_weather"), # agent must have called this tool
)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?"],
evaluators=local,
)
for r in results:
status = "" if r.all_passed else ""
print(f"\n {status} {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for check, counts in r.per_evaluator.items():
print(f" {check}: {counts}")
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Section 3: Azure AI Foundry Evaluators
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
#
# Cloud-powered AI quality assessment. Evaluates relevance, coherence,
# task adherence, tool usage, and more.
#
async def demo_foundry_agent(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate a single agent with Foundry."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 3a. Foundry — Single Agent")
print("" * 60)
agent = create_agent(project_client, deployment)
evals = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
# evaluate_agent: run + evaluate in one call
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?", "Find flights from London to Paris"],
evaluators=evals,
)
for r in results:
print(f"\n {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
print(f" Portal: {r.report_url}")
async def demo_foundry_response(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate a response you already have."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 3b. Foundry — Existing Response")
print("" * 60)
agent = create_agent(project_client, deployment)
# Run the agent yourself
response = await agent.run([Message("user", ["What's the weather in Seattle?"])])
print(f" Agent said: {response.text[:80]}...")
# Then evaluate the response (without re-running the agent)
quality_evals = FoundryEvals(
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
evaluators=[FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.COHERENCE],
)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
responses=response,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?"],
evaluators=quality_evals,
)
for r in results:
print(f"\n {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
async def demo_foundry_workflow(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate a multi-agent workflow with per-agent breakdown."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 3c. Foundry — Multi-Agent Workflow")
print("" * 60)
workflow = create_workflow(project_client, deployment)
evals = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
# Run + evaluate with multiple queries
results = await evaluate_workflow(
workflow=workflow,
queries=["Plan a trip from Seattle to Paris"],
evaluators=evals,
)
print_workflow_results(results)
async def demo_foundry_select(project_client, deployment):
"""Choose specific Foundry evaluators."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 3d. Foundry — Selecting Evaluators")
print("" * 60)
agent = create_agent(project_client, deployment)
# Pick exactly which evaluators to run
evals = FoundryEvals(
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
evaluators=[
FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE,
FoundryEvals.TASK_ADHERENCE,
FoundryEvals.TOOL_CALL_ACCURACY,
],
)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?"],
evaluators=evals,
)
for r in results:
print(f"\n {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for ev_name, counts in r.per_evaluator.items():
print(f" {ev_name}: {counts}")
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Section 4: Mix Everything Together
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
#
# Pass a list of evaluators — local functions, built-in checks, and Foundry
# all run together. You get one EvalResults per provider.
#
async def demo_mixed(project_client, deployment):
"""Combine custom functions, built-in checks, and Foundry in one call."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 4. Mixed Evaluation (recommended)")
print("" * 60)
agent = create_agent(project_client, deployment)
# Local: custom functions + built-in checks
local = LocalEvaluator(
is_helpful,
no_apologies,
keyword_check("weather"),
tool_called_check("get_weather"),
)
# Cloud: Foundry AI quality assessment
foundry = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
# One call, multiple providers
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=[
"What's the weather in Seattle?",
"How much is a flight from London to Paris?",
],
evaluators=[local, foundry],
)
print()
for r in results:
status = "" if r.all_passed else ""
print(f" {status} {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for ev_name, counts in r.per_evaluator.items():
p, f = counts["passed"], counts["failed"]
print(f" {ev_name}: {p}/{p + f}")
if r.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {r.report_url}")
# CI assertion — fails the test if anything didn't pass
for r in results:
r.assert_passed()
print("\n ✓ All evaluations passed!")
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Section 5: Workflow + Mixed Evaluation
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
async def demo_workflow_mixed(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate a workflow with both local and Foundry evaluators."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 5. Workflow + Mixed Evaluation")
print("" * 60)
workflow = create_workflow(project_client, deployment)
local = LocalEvaluator(is_helpful, no_apologies)
foundry = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
results = await evaluate_workflow(
workflow=workflow,
queries=["Plan a trip from Seattle to Paris"],
evaluators=[local, foundry],
)
print_workflow_results(results)
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Section 6: Iterative Workflows (agents run multiple times)
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
#
# When an agent runs multiple times in a single workflow execution (e.g., in
# a group chat or feedback loop), each invocation becomes a separate eval item.
# Results are grouped by agent, so you see e.g. "writer: 3/3 passed".
#
def create_iterative_workflow(project_client, deployment):
"""Create a group chat where a writer and reviewer iterate.
The writer drafts a response, the reviewer critiques it, and the
writer revises — running 2 rounds so each agent is invoked twice.
"""
client = AzureOpenAIResponsesClient(
project_client=project_client,
deployment_name=deployment,
)
writer = Agent(
client=client,
name="writer",
instructions=(
"You are a travel copywriter. Write or revise a short, "
"compelling travel description based on the conversation."
),
default_options={"store": False},
)
reviewer = Agent(
client=client,
name="reviewer",
instructions=("You are an editor. Critique the writer's draft and suggest specific improvements. Be concise."),
default_options={"store": False},
)
# Group chat with round-robin selection: writer → reviewer → writer → reviewer
# Each agent runs twice per query.
def round_robin(state):
names = list(state.participants.keys())
return names[state.current_round % len(names)]
return GroupChatBuilder(
participants=[writer, reviewer],
termination_condition=lambda conversation: len(conversation) >= 5,
selection_func=round_robin,
).build()
async def demo_iterative_workflow(project_client, deployment):
"""Evaluate a workflow where agents run multiple times."""
print()
print("" * 60)
print(" 6. Iterative Workflow (multi-run agents)")
print("" * 60)
workflow = create_iterative_workflow(project_client, deployment)
local = LocalEvaluator(is_helpful, no_apologies)
results = await evaluate_workflow(
workflow=workflow,
queries=["Write a travel description for Kyoto in autumn"],
evaluators=local,
)
print_workflow_results(results)
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Run it
# ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
async def main():
project_client = AIProjectClient(
endpoint=os.environ["AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential(),
)
deployment = os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME", "gpt-4o")
# Run each section — comment out what you don't need
# await demo_evaluators(project_client, deployment)
# await demo_builtin_checks(project_client, deployment)
# await demo_foundry_agent(project_client, deployment)
# await demo_foundry_response(project_client, deployment)
# await demo_foundry_workflow(project_client, deployment)
# await demo_foundry_select(project_client, deployment)
# await demo_mixed(project_client, deployment)
await demo_workflow_mixed(project_client, deployment)
await demo_iterative_workflow(project_client, deployment)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
import asyncio
import os
from agent_framework import (
Agent,
LocalEvaluator,
evaluate_agent,
keyword_check,
tool_called_check,
)
from agent_framework.azure import AzureOpenAIResponsesClient
from agent_framework_azure_ai import FoundryEvals
from azure.ai.projects.aio import AIProjectClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
"""
This sample demonstrates mixing local and cloud evaluation providers.
It shows three patterns:
1. Local-only: Fast, API-free checks for inner-loop development.
2. Cloud-only: Full Foundry evaluators for comprehensive quality assessment.
3. Mixed: Local + Foundry evaluators in a single evaluate_agent() call.
Mixing lets you get instant local feedback (keyword presence, tool usage)
alongside deeper cloud-based quality evaluation (relevance, coherence)
in one call.
Prerequisites:
- An Azure AI Foundry project with a deployed model
- Set AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT and AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME in .env
"""
# Define a simple tool for the agent
def get_weather(location: str) -> str:
"""Get the current weather for a location."""
weather_data = {
"seattle": "62°F, cloudy with a chance of rain",
"london": "55°F, overcast",
"paris": "68°F, partly sunny",
}
return weather_data.get(location.lower(), f"Weather data not available for {location}")
async def main():
# 1. Set up the Azure AI project client
project_client = AIProjectClient(
endpoint=os.environ["AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential(),
)
deployment = os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME", "gpt-4o")
# 2. Create an agent with a tool
agent = Agent(
client=AzureOpenAIResponsesClient(
project_client=project_client,
deployment_name=deployment,
),
name="weather-assistant",
instructions="You are a helpful weather assistant. Use the get_weather tool to answer questions.",
tools=[get_weather],
)
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 1: Local evaluation only (no API calls, instant results)
# =========================================================================
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 1: Local evaluation only")
print("=" * 60)
local = LocalEvaluator(
keyword_check("weather", "seattle"),
tool_called_check("get_weather"),
)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?"],
evaluators=local,
)
for r in results:
print(f"Status: {r.status}")
print(f"Results: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for check_name, counts in r.per_evaluator.items():
print(f" {check_name}: {counts['passed']} passed, {counts['failed']} failed")
if r.all_passed:
print("✓ All local checks passed!")
else:
print(f"✗ Failures: {r.error}")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 2: Foundry evaluation only (cloud-based quality assessment)
# =========================================================================
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 2: Foundry evaluation only")
print("=" * 60)
foundry = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=["What's the weather in Seattle?"],
evaluators=foundry,
)
for r in results:
print(f"Status: {r.status}")
print(f"Results: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
print(f"Portal: {r.report_url}")
if r.all_passed:
print("✓ All passed")
else:
print(f"{r.failed} failed, {r.errored} errored")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 3: Mixed — local + Foundry in one call
# =========================================================================
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 3: Mixed local + Foundry evaluation")
print("=" * 60)
# Local checks: fast smoke tests
local = LocalEvaluator(
keyword_check("weather"),
tool_called_check("get_weather"),
)
# Foundry: deep quality assessment
foundry = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
# Pass both as a list — returns one EvalResults per provider
results = await evaluate_agent(
agent=agent,
queries=[
"What's the weather in Seattle?",
"Tell me the weather in London",
],
evaluators=[local, foundry],
)
for r in results:
status = "" if r.all_passed else ""
print(f" {status} {r.provider}: {r.passed}/{r.total} passed")
for check_name, counts in r.per_evaluator.items():
print(f" {check_name}: {counts['passed']}/{counts['passed'] + counts['failed']}")
if r.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {r.report_url}")
if all(r.all_passed for r in results):
print("✓ All checks passed (local + Foundry)!")
else:
failed = [r.provider for r in results if not r.all_passed]
print(f"✗ Failed providers: {', '.join(failed)}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
import asyncio
import os
from agent_framework import ConversationSplit, EvalItem
from agent_framework_azure_ai import FoundryEvals
from azure.ai.projects.aio import AIProjectClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
"""
This sample demonstrates how conversation split strategies affect evaluation.
The same multi-turn conversation can be split different ways, each evaluating
a different aspect of agent behavior:
1. LAST_TURN (default) — "Was the last response good given context?"
2. FULL — "Did the whole conversation serve the original request?"
3. per_turn_items — "Was each individual response appropriate?"
Prerequisites:
- An Azure AI Foundry project with a deployed model
- Set AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT and AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME in .env
"""
# A multi-turn conversation with tool calls that we'll evaluate three ways.
CONVERSATION = [
# Turn 1: user asks about weather → agent calls tool → responds
{"role": "user", "content": "What's the weather in Seattle?"},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": [
{"type": "tool_call", "tool_call_id": "c1", "name": "get_weather", "arguments": {"location": "seattle"}}
],
},
{
"role": "tool",
"tool_call_id": "c1",
"content": [{"type": "tool_result", "tool_result": "62°F, cloudy with a chance of rain"}],
},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "Seattle is 62°F, cloudy with a chance of rain."},
# Turn 2: user asks about Paris → agent calls tool → responds
{"role": "user", "content": "And Paris?"},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": [
{"type": "tool_call", "tool_call_id": "c2", "name": "get_weather", "arguments": {"location": "paris"}}
],
},
{
"role": "tool",
"tool_call_id": "c2",
"content": [{"type": "tool_result", "tool_result": "68°F, partly sunny"}],
},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "Paris is 68°F, partly sunny."},
# Turn 3: user asks for comparison → agent synthesizes without tool
{"role": "user", "content": "Can you compare them?"},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Seattle is cooler at 62°F with rain likely, while Paris is warmer at 68°F and partly sunny. Paris is the better choice for outdoor activities.",
},
]
TOOL_DEFINITIONS = [
{
"name": "get_weather",
"description": "Get the current weather for a location.",
"parameters": {"type": "object", "properties": {"location": {"type": "string"}}},
},
]
def print_split(item: EvalItem, split: ConversationSplit = ConversationSplit.LAST_TURN):
"""Print the query/response split for an EvalItem."""
d = item.to_eval_data(split=split)
print(f" query_messages ({len(d['query_messages'])}):")
for m in d["query_messages"]:
content = m.get("content", "")
if isinstance(content, list):
content = content[0].get("type", str(content[0]))
print(f" {m['role']}: {str(content)[:70]}")
print(f" response_messages ({len(d['response_messages'])}):")
for m in d["response_messages"]:
content = m.get("content", "")
if isinstance(content, list):
content = content[0].get("type", str(content[0]))
print(f" {m['role']}: {str(content)[:70]}")
async def main():
project_client = AIProjectClient(
endpoint=os.environ["AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential(),
)
deployment = os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME", "gpt-4o")
# =========================================================================
# Strategy 1: LAST_TURN (default)
# "Given all context, was the last response good?"
# =========================================================================
print("=" * 70)
print("Strategy 1: LAST_TURN — evaluate the final response")
print("=" * 70)
item = EvalItem(
query="Can you compare them?",
response="Seattle is cooler at 62°F with rain likely, while Paris is warmer at 68°F and partly sunny. Paris is the better choice for outdoor activities.",
conversation=CONVERSATION,
tool_definitions=TOOL_DEFINITIONS,
)
print_split(item, ConversationSplit.LAST_TURN)
results = await FoundryEvals(
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
evaluators=[FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.COHERENCE],
# conversation_split defaults to LAST_TURN
).evaluate([item], eval_name="Split Strategy: LAST_TURN")
print(f"\n Result: {results.passed}/{results.total} passed")
print(f" Portal: {results.report_url}")
for ir in results.items:
for s in ir.scores:
print(f" {'' if s.passed else ''} {s.name}: {s.score}")
print()
# =========================================================================
# Strategy 2: FULL
# "Given the original request, did the whole conversation serve the user?"
# =========================================================================
print("=" * 70)
print("Strategy 2: FULL — evaluate the entire conversation trajectory")
print("=" * 70)
print_split(item, ConversationSplit.FULL)
results = await FoundryEvals(
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
evaluators=[FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.COHERENCE],
conversation_split=ConversationSplit.FULL,
).evaluate([item], eval_name="Split Strategy: FULL")
print(f"\n Result: {results.passed}/{results.total} passed")
print(f" Portal: {results.report_url}")
for ir in results.items:
for s in ir.scores:
print(f" {'' if s.passed else ''} {s.name}: {s.score}")
print()
# =========================================================================
# Strategy 3: per_turn_items
# "Was each individual response appropriate at that point?"
# =========================================================================
print("=" * 70)
print("Strategy 3: per_turn_items — evaluate each turn independently")
print("=" * 70)
items = EvalItem.per_turn_items(
CONVERSATION,
tool_definitions=TOOL_DEFINITIONS,
)
print(f" Split into {len(items)} items from {len(CONVERSATION)} messages:\n")
for i, it in enumerate(items):
print(f" Turn {i + 1}: query={it.query!r}, response={it.response[:60]!r}...")
print()
results = await FoundryEvals(
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
evaluators=[FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.COHERENCE],
).evaluate(items, eval_name="Split Strategy: Per-Turn")
print(f"\n Result: {results.passed}/{results.total} passed ({len(items)} items × 2 evaluators)")
print(f" Portal: {results.report_url}")
for ir in results.items:
for s in ir.scores:
print(f" {'' if s.passed else ''} {s.name}: {s.score}")
print()
print("=" * 70)
print("All strategies complete. Compare results in the Foundry portal.")
print("=" * 70)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
import asyncio
import os
from agent_framework_azure_ai import FoundryEvals, evaluate_traces
from azure.ai.projects.aio import AIProjectClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
"""
This sample demonstrates evaluating agent responses that already exist in Foundry.
It shows two patterns:
1. evaluate_traces(response_ids=...) — Evaluate specific Responses API responses by ID.
2. evaluate_traces(agent_id=...) — Evaluate agent behavior from OTel traces in App Insights.
These are the "zero-code-change" evaluation paths — the agent has already run,
and you're evaluating what happened after the fact.
Prerequisites:
- An Azure AI Foundry project with a deployed model
- Response IDs from prior agent runs (for Pattern 1)
- OTel traces exported to App Insights (for Pattern 2)
- Set AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT and AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME in .env
"""
async def main():
# 1. Set up the Azure AI project client
project_client = AIProjectClient(
endpoint=os.environ["AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential(),
)
deployment = os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME", "gpt-4o")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 1: evaluate_traces(response_ids=...) — By response ID
# =========================================================================
# If your agent uses the Responses API (e.g., AzureOpenAIResponsesClient),
# each run produces a response_id. Pass those IDs to evaluate_traces()
# and Foundry retrieves the full conversation for evaluation.
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 1: evaluate_traces(response_ids=...)")
print("=" * 60)
# Replace these with actual response IDs from your agent runs
response_ids = [
"resp_abc123",
"resp_def456",
]
results = await evaluate_traces(
response_ids=response_ids,
evaluators=[FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.GROUNDEDNESS, FoundryEvals.TOOL_CALL_ACCURACY],
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
)
print(f"Status: {results.status}")
print(f"Results: {results.result_counts}")
print(f"Portal: {results.report_url}")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 2: evaluate_traces(agent_id=...) — From App Insights
# =========================================================================
# If your agent emits OTel traces to App Insights (via configure_otel_providers),
# you can evaluate recent activity without specifying individual response IDs.
#
# NOTE: Requires OTel traces exported to the App Insights instance connected
# to your Foundry project. The exact trace-based data source API is subject
# to change as Foundry evolves.
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 2: evaluate_traces(agent_id=...)")
print("=" * 60)
# Evaluate by response IDs (uses response-based data source internally)
results = await evaluate_traces(
response_ids=response_ids,
evaluators=[FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.COHERENCE],
project_client=project_client,
model_deployment=deployment,
)
print(f"Status: {results.status}")
print(f"Portal: {results.report_url}")
# Evaluate by agent ID + time window (when trace-based API is available)
# results = await evaluate_traces(
# agent_id="travel-bot",
# evaluators=[FoundryEvals.INTENT_RESOLUTION, FoundryEvals.TASK_ADHERENCE],
# project_client=project_client,
# model_deployment=deployment,
# lookback_hours=24,
# )
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
"""
Sample output (with actual Azure AI Foundry project and valid response IDs):
============================================================
Pattern 1: evaluate_traces(response_ids=...)
============================================================
Status: completed
Results: {'passed': 2, 'failed': 0, 'errored': 0}
Portal: https://ai.azure.com/...
============================================================
Pattern 2: evaluate_traces(agent_id=...)
============================================================
Status: completed
Portal: https://ai.azure.com/...
"""
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved.
import asyncio
import os
from agent_framework import Agent, evaluate_workflow
from agent_framework.azure import AzureOpenAIResponsesClient
from agent_framework_azure_ai import FoundryEvals
from agent_framework_orchestrations import SequentialBuilder
from azure.ai.projects.aio import AIProjectClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
"""
This sample demonstrates evaluating a multi-agent workflow using Azure AI Foundry evaluators.
It shows two patterns:
1. Post-hoc: Run the workflow, then evaluate the result you already have.
2. Run + evaluate: Pass queries and let evaluate_workflow() run the workflow for you.
Both patterns return a list of results (one per provider), each with a per-agent
breakdown in sub_results so you can identify which agent is underperforming.
Prerequisites:
- An Azure AI Foundry project with a deployed model
- Set AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT and AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME in .env
"""
# Simple tools for the agents
def get_weather(location: str) -> str:
"""Get the current weather for a location."""
weather_data = {
"seattle": "62°F, cloudy with a chance of rain",
"london": "55°F, overcast",
"paris": "68°F, partly sunny",
}
return weather_data.get(location.lower(), f"Weather data not available for {location}")
def get_flight_price(origin: str, destination: str) -> str:
"""Get the price of a flight between two cities."""
return f"Flights from {origin} to {destination}: $450 round-trip"
async def main():
# 1. Set up the Azure AI project client
project_client = AIProjectClient(
endpoint=os.environ["AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential(),
)
deployment = os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_MODEL_DEPLOYMENT_NAME", "gpt-4o")
client = AzureOpenAIResponsesClient(
project_client=project_client,
deployment_name=deployment,
)
# 2. Create agents for a sequential workflow
# Use store=False so agents don't chain conversation state via previous_response_id.
# This allows the workflow to be run multiple times without stale state issues.
researcher = Agent(
client=client,
name="researcher",
instructions=(
"You are a travel researcher. Use your tools to gather weather "
"and flight information for the destination the user asks about."
),
tools=[get_weather, get_flight_price],
default_options={"store": False},
)
planner = Agent(
client=client,
name="planner",
instructions=(
"You are a travel planner. Based on the research provided, "
"create a concise travel recommendation with packing tips."
),
default_options={"store": False},
)
# 3. Build a sequential workflow: researcher → planner
workflow = SequentialBuilder(participants=[researcher, planner]).build()
# 4. Create the evaluator — provider config goes here, once
evals = FoundryEvals(project_client=project_client, model_deployment=deployment)
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 1: Post-hoc — evaluate a workflow run you already did
# =========================================================================
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 1: Post-hoc workflow evaluation")
print("=" * 60)
result = await workflow.run("Plan a trip from Seattle to Paris")
eval_results = await evaluate_workflow(
workflow=workflow,
workflow_result=result,
evaluators=evals,
)
for r in eval_results:
print(f"\nOverall: {r.status}")
print(f" Passed: {r.passed}/{r.total}")
print(f" Portal: {r.report_url}")
print("\nPer-agent breakdown:")
for agent_name, agent_eval in r.sub_results.items():
print(f" {agent_name}: {agent_eval.passed}/{agent_eval.total} passed")
if agent_eval.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {agent_eval.report_url}")
# =========================================================================
# Pattern 2: Run + evaluate with multiple queries
# =========================================================================
# Build a fresh workflow to avoid stale session state from Pattern 1.
# The Responses API tracks previous_response_id per session, so reusing
# a workflow after a run would reference stale tool calls.
workflow2 = SequentialBuilder(participants=[researcher, planner]).build()
print()
print("=" * 60)
print("Pattern 2: Run + evaluate with multiple queries")
print("=" * 60)
eval_results = await evaluate_workflow(
workflow=workflow2,
queries=[
"Plan a trip from London to Tokyo",
"Plan a trip from New York to Rome",
],
evaluators=evals.select(FoundryEvals.RELEVANCE, FoundryEvals.TASK_ADHERENCE),
)
for r in eval_results:
print(f"\nOverall: {r.status}")
print(f" Passed: {r.passed}/{r.total}")
if r.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {r.report_url}")
print("\nPer-agent breakdown:")
for agent_name, agent_eval in r.sub_results.items():
print(f" {agent_name}: {agent_eval.passed}/{agent_eval.total} passed")
if agent_eval.report_url:
print(f" Portal: {agent_eval.report_url}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
"""
Sample output (with actual Azure AI Foundry project):
============================================================
Pattern 1: Post-hoc workflow evaluation
============================================================
Overall: completed
Passed: 2/2
Portal: https://ai.azure.com/...
Per-agent breakdown:
researcher: 1/1 passed
planner: 1/1 passed
============================================================
Pattern 2: Run + evaluate with multiple queries
============================================================
Overall: completed
Passed: 4/4
Per-agent breakdown:
researcher: 2/2 passed
planner: 2/2 passed
"""
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ from azure.ai.agentserver.agentframework import from_agent_framework
from azure.identity.aio import AzureCliCredential, ManagedIdentityCredential
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv(override=True)
# Configure these for your Foundry project